search for: incorrecly

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "incorrecly".

Did you mean: incorrectly
1999 Oct 17
0
When viewed on NT4.0 file sizes of samba share are incorrecly too large
Hi everyone, Here is my problem: All NT4.0 machines accessing a samba share located on a Solaris 2.6 server (running smbd version 2.0.4b) see the file sizes to be MUCH (terabytes) larger than they actually are. This is true both when looking through Explorer (file manager) and through MS-DOS prompt. On Windows98 machines the files are irrationally large via Explorer, but are the correct size
2015 Oct 01
2
SeDiskOperatorPrivilege - NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_PRIVILEGE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hmm why, the guy at https://raymii.org/s/tutorials/SAMBA_Share_with_Active_Directory_Login_o n_Ubuntu_12.04.html does exactly this. Also the manpage e.g. for smb.conf describes the config for a connection to an AD. And after granting file rights to the share via setfacl -m g:domänen-admins:rwx /var/samba/test I can mkdir and granting rights to
2013 Aug 30
7
bootwrapper can't be compiled for cubieboard2
Hi Ian, I try compile the bootwrapper for cubieboard2 like this: joshzhao@joshzhao-ThinkCentre-M58p:~/project/Xen/A20/boot-wrapper$ make cubieboard2_defconfig CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- # # configuration written to .config # joshzhao@joshzhao-ThinkCentre-M58p:~/project/Xen/A20/boot-wrapper$ make CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- make -C scripts/kconfig -f Makefile.bootwrapper
2015 Oct 01
2
SeDiskOperatorPrivilege - NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_PRIVILEGE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 28.09.2015 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 28/09/15 11:30, Steffen Weißgerber wrote: > Hello, > > after configuring kerberos and winbind for authentication against an A D > (Window 2008 R2) and succesful launching getent passwd I followed the > instructions https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs > for
2009 Dec 21
26
Questions on qcow, qcow2 versus LVM
I''ve been using lvm under centos to create the backing store for domUs and although the performance seems acceptable it has some shortcomings. The biggest of which is the LVM bug which prevents me from removing an lv (it says it is still mounted and it definitely isnt). I thought this was just a centos bug but it appears to be evident in debian and ubuntu too and I really can''t