search for: incor

well the subject tell's it.. it's not able to change password's for users from a miupoms xp/2000 machine... windows is complaining about, domain not availeable.. and samba show's an (incor.password lenght error) i used an password over 5 char's (6 and 8) and the min. passwd lenght is 5 !! anny clue's?? there is an encryped passwords=yes in the conf.. l8r --------------------------------------------- Collen Blijenberg (Systeem/Netwerk Beheerder) Montessori Lyceum Herman J...

...0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x:1025;branch=z9hG4bK-839856dc;received=x.x.x.x From: "SPA922" <sip:5403@mysipserver.com>;tag=685bbad1fae3325do0 To: "SPA922" <sip:5403@mysipserver.com> Call-ID: 9b51726c-3e768481@192.168.0.110 CSeq: 5504 REGISTER User-Agent: incore-PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Contact: <sip:5403@mysipserver.com> Content-Length: 0 SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x:1025;branch=z9hG4bK-43bf8123;received=x.x.x.x From: "SPA922" <sip:5403@mysipserver.com>;tag=...

...t; >>CBM> well the subject tell's it.. >> >>CBM> it's not able to change password's for users >>CBM> from a miupoms xp/2000 machine... >> >>CBM> windows is complaining about, domain not availeable.. >>CBM> and samba show's an (incor.password lenght error) >> >>CBM> i used an password over 5 char's (6 and 8) >>CBM> and the min. passwd lenght is 5 !! >> >>CBM> anny clue's?? >>CBM> there is an encryped passwords=yes in the conf.. >> >>CBM> l8r >>CBM>...

...ervice/client. Why are they checking FIPS_mode() if the FIPS_mode_set() wasn't even called before that ? The SSLeay_add_all_algorithms() is supposed call FIPS_mode_set() ? Another question I have is why are they using FIPSCHECK_verify() from libfipscheck if the FIPS_mode_set() already check the incore fingerprint when called. Is this another requirement from FIPS 140-2 ? Great thanks ! -- "Forgive, O Lord, my little jokes on Thee, and I'll forgive Thy great big joke on me." http://pyevolve.sourceforge.net/wordpress/

...ructures" is presently loaded into memory in its entirety > when accessed. For large data objects, this isn't ideal. An > alternative implementation would be to store such a big array on disk > and load into memory only the parts that are really needed. In other > words, the incore representation would simply be a cache of the entire > data object. Of course, once this is done you could also vary the > external representation of objects. For example, instead of storing > each array element next to each other, it often could be advantageous > to store the fields...

Hi All I have a samba server running on solaris 2.5.1. On the same machine there is a ISC dhcpd server which is configured to supply all the tcp/ip information to the NT Clients dynamically (ip, wins, domainname, dns, router etc.). So my NT Clients get only a name and are configured to get their tcp/ip information from the dhcpd server. Now, everything runs fine browsing, NetBios name

...ragmented disk space and metadata read is a sync operation, which impacts the efficiency of readahead much. The patches try to add meatadata readahead for btrfs. In btrfs, metadata is stored in btree_inode. Ideally, if we could hook the inode to a fd so we could use existing syscalls (readahead, mincore or upcoming fincore) to do readahead, but the inode is hidden, there is no easy way for this from my understanding. So we add two ioctls for this. One is like readahead syscall, the other is like micore/fincore syscall. Under a harddisk based netbook with Meego, the metadata readahead reduced ab...

We''re starting to grow our ZFS environment and really need to start standardizing our monitoring procedures. OS tools are great for spot troubleshooting and sar can be used for some trending, but we''d really like to tie this into an SNMP based system that can generate graphs for us (via RRD or other). Whether or not we do this via our standard enterprise monitoring tool or

...he initial version WAS too long and covered lots of ground that ultimately only served to confuse the newbie. Thanks to the readers of these lists, those issues got sorted. I hope I don't sound obtuse, hostile, or unfriendly. I think your points are generally very good and useful (and I will incorate most of them into the document), but I strongly disagree on the tutorial thingy :-) -- Disclaimer: I am *not* arrogant in real life, so if you perceive me as being arrogant, you are to blame ;-) 2012/6/18 Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Mi...

We''ve been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode''s sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the board, and not just in file write. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 3 --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 4 ++-- fs/btrfs/file.c | 1...

...| 265 +++++------ fs/efivarfs/super.c | 20 + fs/fs_context.c | 16 - fs/fs_parser.c | 18 + fs/fuse/control.c | 20 + fs/fuse/inode.c | 291 +++++++----- fs/gfs2/incore.h | 8 fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 495 ++++++++++++++++----- fs/gfs2/super.c | 335 -------------- fs/gfs2/super.h | 3 fs/jffs2/fs.c | 21 - fs/jffs2/os-linux.h...

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi all, > >     3. The document now covers 32-bit and 64-bit builds with MinGW tools (if > anybody know of an alternate BINARY distribution of MinGW64 than Drangon's > release, please let me know so I can include it in the document). As was once explained to me by Ruben Van Boxem, what you

Hi all, Here's an updated version of my proposed "Building with MinGW on Windows" document. In summary, the document gives a step-by-step description of how to build LLVM + Clang on Windows WITHOUT having Microsoft Visual Studio installed. The high-level goal of the document is to make life pleasant for those wonderful Windows users who desire to try out LLVM and/or Clang. I

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> One of the major goals of LSM stacking is to run multiple LSMs side by side without interfering with each other. The ultimate decision will depend on individual LSM decision. Several changes need to be made to the LSM infrastructure to be able to support that. This patch set tackles one of them: gives to each LSM the ability to specify one

The problem occurs after an update of 8-stable from r248120 to r252111. Sometimes shutdown hangs: Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...done Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...done Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop... Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...0 0 done All buffers synced. >From the kernel