search for: inconveniencing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 64 matches for "inconveniencing".

1997 May 15
4
R-alpha: A Couple of Queries
1) I have been working on making R libraries more like those in S. I thought it might be advisable to discuss the ideas before springing them on you. What I have done is changed things so that each library has its own frame on the search path. E.g. > search() [1] ".GlobalEnv" "library:base" > library("eda") > search() [1] ".GlobalEnv"
2010 Sep 14
6
[LLVMdev] LLVM SVN Repository Offline for Maintenance Tomorrow
Dear LLVMers and Clangers, We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. 14 (tomorrow). There were some files committed to the repository that we believe need to be removed from both mainline, the branches, and the revision history. The SVN repository will go *off-line* at 7:00 am Central Daylight Savings time on Tuesday. Please do not make any commits after
2003 Mar 19
2
Printer Rights Fail
Hello everyone, I upgraded my Samba server on my RHL 7.2 box from 2.2.3a to 2.2.7. Almost immediately afterwards, all of my admin users suddenly were unable to access the printers that were being shared by Samba. Any idea of what is wrong and how to fix it? The messages I'm getting are that I do not have enough rights. I am using a Windows 2000 Server PDC and a lot of Windows XP Pro, and
2005 May 27
1
VoiPSupply Dot Com: Epilogue
LOL - You mean he actually 'met' Newt Gingrich? How dare you not extend him credit!!! I mean seriously... For such a distinguished individual... Hey, not only have I met the heads of several multi-billion dollar corps, I have gotten absolutely blasted drunk with them. So I should get credit, a 40% discount, and your daughters phone number, right??? LOL Seriously, though. I think it
2013 Nov 07
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:12 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes: > > So far, I'm not hearing any significant objections. > > > > I'm going to put the plan of record about this into the release notes, > > and I'll write up a blog post about it and do some other things which > > will likely make
2003 Feb 04
2
AW: Samba and Winbindd problem
Hi, i had have the same problem with winbindd try this "smbpasswd -j <Dmainname> -r <Windows PDC> -U Administrator%<Password>" Now you should read "Joined Domain <Domain>" Now set the Username and PAssword for winbindd to access the PDC I have used the admin account for this "wbinfo -A Administrator%<Password>" Now try again wbinfo
2003 Mar 18
2
Multiple Groups, Different Permissions problem
Hello everyone, I need to setup some directories (in RHL 7.2 running Samba 2.2.3a w/ W2K PDC) to allow multiple groups, each of which has different permissions. If this can be done on the Linux side, this would be preferred, but if it has to be done in Samba, any help in understanding how to make this happen is appreciated. I know Windows NT/W2K allows multiple groups and I would think Linux
2010 Sep 14
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM SVN Repository Offline for Maintenance Tomorrow
Dear All, Just a reminder that the maintenance will be commencing now. -- John T. John Criswell wrote: > Dear LLVMers and Clangers, > > We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. > 14 (tomorrow). There were some files committed to the repository that > we believe need to be removed from both mainline, the branches, and the > revision
2013 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes: > The overwhelming majority of contributors and users of trunk seem to > be fine with this, so while I'm interested in anything we can do to > make it easier for you, unless we see significantly more concerns > about this plan, I think we should move forward. > > Fundamentally, we aren't going to be able to make
2008 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
...t. > > Is this something your planning as putting in the tree, thus require > pulling in changes from google (license allowing), or does user need > to have the libraries/headers pre-installed? > > Including it in the tree is the most reasonable thing to do. No > point in inconveniencing the user over tiny libraries with liberal > licenses. I didn't get to look at the license. > > My question was not to cause a battle, but I wanted to be sure we > were using the right test kit, and not just picking one just > because. For example gtest is very light weig...
2008 Dec 28
3
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
...the > project. > > Is this something your planning as putting in the tree, > thus require pulling in changes from google (license allowing), or does user > need to have the libraries/headers pre-installed? > Including it in the tree is the most reasonable thing to do. No point in inconveniencing the user over tiny libraries with liberal licenses. > > My question was not to cause a battle, but I wanted to be sure we were > using the right test kit, and not just picking one just because. For > example gtest is very light weight test kit, that can do the job, but will > the...
2008 Jan 30
5
One approach to dealing with SSH brute force attacks.
...rnet then it must be secured whether it is well known or not and if it is properly secured then changing the port number customarily assigned provides no measurable benefit. In my opinion, arbitrarily switching port numbers for well known services provides only the illusion of security while often inconveniencing the legitimate users in unpredictable, and sometimes expensively resolved, fashions. To deal with brute force attacks (not just on ssh) I spent some time tracking down how others had dealt with the problem. I discovered thereby that one can use the simple linux firewall iptables to restrict the nu...
2008 Dec 28
2
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
...; Is this something your planning as putting in the tree, >> thus require pulling in changes from google (license allowing), or does user >> need to have the libraries/headers pre-installed? >> > > Including it in the tree is the most reasonable thing to do. No point in > inconveniencing the user over tiny libraries with liberal licenses. > > I didn't get to look at the license. > http://code.google.com/p/googletest/ -> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php . > One other nice feature of using gtest is that it integrates with gmock, one > of the...
2008 May 27
2
ForkCDR
Hello, CDR fans! I'm looking at some issues brought forward over time: 12726/10668: someone wants me to revert the changes I made via bug 10668, last Sept; (that's they are messing him up. And I didn't do the change suggested in ForkCDR, for fear of lousing up folks depending on current behavior. Which probably sparked: 11721 :
2011 Sep 29
1
[LLVMdev] Building bitcode modules
On 9/29/11 12:39 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Sep 29, 2011, at 10:35 AM, John Criswell wrote: > >> On 9/29/11 11:45 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>>> (I'm jumping into the middle of this conversation as it looks like you're discussing something that might be relevant to my work. Sorry I'm not up to speed on the full context of the discussion...)
2010 Aug 03
1
[LLVMdev] CMake error on Win32
Hi Oscar, Is there a way to make it work with CMake 2.6? That is what the public win32 buildbot has and I hate messing around with it. - Daniel On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at gmail.com> writes: > >> I am getting the following error from CMake :- >> >>     CMake Error at
2010 Sep 14
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM SVN Repository Offline for Maintenance Tomorrow
Hi John- Will this also mean a purging of the llvm-commits archive, to remove the diffs with the guilty files in them? Alistair On 14 Sep 2010, at 01:38, John Criswell wrote: > Dear LLVMers and Clangers, > > We'll be doing some maintenance on the LLVM repository on Tuesday, Sept. > 14 (tomorrow). There were some files committed to the repository that > we believe need to
2008 Nov 25
0
optimization with bounds on parameters
There have been several posts about optimizations where the parameters for the objective function are bounds-constrained. Brian Ripley took my 1990 "Compact numerical methods for computers" codes and p2c'd them to give the CG and BFGS and (possibly, I should check!) the Nelder Mead code. However, I have for use by myself and colleagues prepared variants of the codes that allow
2009 Sep 14
2
Plea: No long unbroken lines, please!
Hi Folks, I don't often grumble, but this time I've found myself inconvenienced by a posting stored on R-help archives: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2009-September/211095.html This was Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn & Stef van Buuren's message on 10 September about the new version of MICE. This has been sent by software which inserted no line-breaks. As a result, each
2004 Mar 06
0
[Bug 808] segfault if not using pam/keyboard-interactive mech and password's expired
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org wrote: >Summary: segfault if not using pam/keyboard-interactive mech and > password's expired I'm sorry to report that there is a bug in the PAM code in OpenSSH 3.8p1, and sorrier to say that I put it there. This is a NULL pointer dereference and is *not* considered to be a security vulnerability. When sshd is configured --with-pam, run with