Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "incontext".
Did you mean:
ncontext
2005 Sep 13
0
PRI zap channels not cleared when no match incontext for dialed number on inbound call
...ces@lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
> Damon Estep
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:57 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] PRI zap channels not cleared when
> no match incontext for dialed number on inbound call
>
> Could some out there with a PRI check and see if this problem
> shows up on your system?
>
> The test is to dial a number routed to * via a PRI where
> there is no match in the dial plan for the dialed number.
>
> Asterisk will reje...
2015 Aug 25
2
Problem with local context getType() == global context getType()
...lvm 3.6.2
I created a bug for it: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24521
I'm building a app where multiple code gen can happen in parallel. The
documentation state that I need to use separate context. Each thread has
it's own context.
When code generating a constant number I use the *InContext() calls to
create the types. The assert fails since the optimizer replaces some
numbers with a global type. The values are equal but the types are not. I
did patch some calls to compare on getTypeID() but got another assert a
couple of days later in another source file.
I needed 3.7 because of the...
2013 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] Calling dispatch_async() within call to ExecutionEngine::runFunction()
I have used libdispatch (on FreeBSD) from JIT'd code without any issues, so I think your bug is elsewhere.
David
On 30 Jan 2013, at 07:43, Rick Mann wrote:
> My host app calls runFunction() on my JITed code. It, in turn, calls a C function ("decode()") in the host app that then calls dispatch_async(). The runFunction() call returns as expected, but the block passed to
2013 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] Calling dispatch_async() within call to ExecutionEngine::runFunction()
My host app calls runFunction() on my JITed code. It, in turn, calls a C function ("decode()") in the host app that then calls dispatch_async(). The runFunction() call returns as expected, but the block passed to dispatch_async() never gets called. The async block is supposed to call a function pointer callback that was passed in to decode().
Everything is being called on the main
2005 Sep 13
1
PRI zap channels not cleared whennomatchincontext for dialed number on inbound call
...ounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:27 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI zap channels not cleared
> whennomatchincontext for dialed number on inbound call
>
>
> Yeah the "variable stays there" because the channel is never up to be
> cleared. If you do something like
>
> exten => _X.,1,Wait(1)
> exten => _X.,2,Hangup
>
> You will see the same behavior. Can you confirm??...
2005 Sep 13
0
PRI zap channels not cleared when no matchincontext for dialed number on inbound call
...nces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:08 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI zap channels not cleared when no
> matchincontext for dialed number on inbound call
>
>
> I se what you are talking about I an able to reproduce!!!
>
> However your PRI may be in a Round-Robin picking order, that would
cycle
> through all of the channels until it reaches an end and then it
repeats.
> I set our PRI to first...
2005 Sep 13
0
PRI zap channels not cleared when nomatchincontext for dialed number on inbound call
...s@lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
> Damon Estep
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:11 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] PRI zap channels not cleared
> when nomatchincontext for dialed number on inbound call
>
> But it does indicated that a variable is staying assigned
> that should not be, which could have other impact over time???
>
> The behavior is very different for c call where there is a
> dialplan match for the dialed number, when the call...