Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5814 matches for "incompatibles".
Did you mean:
incompatible
2007 Dec 09
8
zpool kernel panics.
Hi Folks,
I''ve got a 3.9 Tb zpool, and it is casing kernel panics on my Solaris
10 280r (SPARC) server.
The message I get on panic is this:
panic[cpu1]/thread=2a100a95cc0: zfs: freeing free segment
(offset=423713792 size=1024)
This seems to come about when the zpool is being used or being
scrubbed - about twice a day at the moment. After the reboot, the
scrub seems to have
1999 Jul 29
0
Strange problem with samba 1.9.18p10 on Solaris 2.6
...null
# writeable = no
# public = true
# hide dot files = yes
# preserve case = yes
# short preserve case = yes
[test]
path = /tmp
public = true
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
writable = no
#
-------------- next part --------------
Patch: 105642-02 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWkvm
Patch: 105757-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu
Patch: 105755-03 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu
Patch: 105746-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcsu
Patch: 105736-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: P...
2013 Apr 17
8
Compiling error
Hi,
During the compilatin of xen i have the following error message:
i8259.c:66:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror]
i8259.c:66:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[6]’) [-Werror]
i8259.c:66:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror]
i8259.c:66:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[7]’) [-Werror]
i8259.c:66:9: error:
2013 Apr 17
8
Compiling error
Hi,
During the compilatin of xen i have the following error message:
i8259.c:66:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror]
i8259.c:66:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[6]’) [-Werror]
i8259.c:66:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror]
i8259.c:66:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[7]’) [-Werror]
i8259.c:66:9: error:
2013 Jun 25
0
Syslinux 6.00 released
Hallo, Matt,
Du meintest am 25.06.13:
[compiling syslinux-6.00]
>> Thanks - now it crashes later ...
> What crash are you seeing?
------------- cite on -------------
[...]
gcc -Wp,-MT,abort.o,-MD,./.abort.o.d -Os -march=x86-64 -falign-
functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-labels=0 -ffast-math -fomit-frame-
pointer -std=gnu99 -fno-stack-protector -fwrapv -freg-struct-return -
2013 Jun 25
4
Syslinux 6.00 released
On Tue, 25 Jun, at 01:52:00PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Thanks - now it crashes later ...
What crash are you seeing?
> I don't have the ia64 files which are needed for a complete binary. But
> maybe that's only my special problem.
You shouldn't need ia64 files to build ia32 and x86-64 versions of
gnu-efi or Syslinux.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
2005 Oct 25
2
centos 4.2 with reiserfs
Hi,
I tried to compile the 2.6.9-22.EL kernel with reiserfs enabled. make fails as
follows. anyone managed to compile with reiserfs successfully?
CC [M] fs/reiserfs/stree.o
fs/reiserfs/stree.c: In function `get_lkey':
fs/reiserfs/stree.c:322: warning: return from incompatible pointer type
fs/reiserfs/stree.c:325: warning: return from incompatible pointer type
fs/reiserfs/stree.c:329:
2006 Oct 31
1
Compiling R packages on Ubuntu
I am unable to compile R packages from source on Ubuntu
dapper/edgy. Does anybody have an experience?
When I do install.packages("nlme",depend=TRUE), I get following error messages. Can someone help?
I get similar messages for any package I try to compile.
VR
-------------
* Installing *source* package 'nlme' ...
** libs
gcc -I/usr/share/R/include -I/usr/share/R/include
2003 Sep 15
1
SCO Open Server 5.06 Several Problems running make
SCO Open Server Enterprise 5.06, Samba-2.2.8a
I received the following compile errors:
smbd/server.c line 302 argument is incompatible with prototype: arg #3
smbd/password.c line 664, argument is incompatible with prototype: arg #1
libsmb/clirap.c line 114 argument is incompatible with prototype arg #9
line 114 argument is incompatible with prototype arg#11
2015 Feb 27
1
[LLVMdev] clang\clang++ 3.6.0 don't find C\C++ header , in windows ?
1 hour ago I downloaded llvm-3.6.0-rc4-win32.exe from
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.6.0/ .
I tried to compile simple C code that just print "hello" , but it
didn't compile , because clang.exe can't find . when I use
clang-cl.exe with the same code , it worked .
I also have the same problem with clang++ even with , I add -I flag to
GCC (4.9.1) C++ headers , the result:
2008 May 21
1
colorspace package does not compile on ubuntu 7.04 32 bit
Hi everyone,
I am trying to install colorspace (needed as part of my favourite ggplot2)
on R v 2.7.0 running under ubuntu 7.04. The package is provided as source
files and the compilation fails as below.
I suspect this might be a problem with gcc v3/v4 incompatibility (or
anything else), but I don't really know how to resolve it. Any advice will
be appreciated - or perhaps somebody has got
2008 Mar 27
1
Cannot update packages on F8
Dear All,
I have just updated R to the version 2.6.2 on F8 (with the official F8
rpm). However, when running as root the following command:
update.packages(checkBuilt=T)
I get a bunch of errors like the ones below. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
-----------------------------------------------
* Installing *source* package 'nlme' ...
** libs
gcc -m32 -std=gnu99 -I/usr/include/R
2006 Apr 21
1
Linker problem in installing 64-bit R
Hi,
I am trying to compile R-2.2.1 on Solaris 2.9 with a 64-bit build. Following
the instructions in "R Installation and Adminstration", I changed the
following settings in "config.site":
CC="gcc -m64"
F77="g77 -64"
CXX="g++ -m64"
LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib/sparcv9 -L/usr/local/lib"
But I got the following error messages:
2003 Mar 13
0
Still warnings on Solaris 9 (sparc)
Sun's Forte C 6.2 Solaris 9 (sparc64),
CVS of 2.2 as of Weds 13th March about 1130 UK time
CC=cc ./configure --with-readline=/usr/local/ --with-quotas --with-utmp --with-acl-support --with-syslog --with-libsmbclient --with-automount --without-winbind
Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -I/usr/local//include -I/usr/local//include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
2002 Dec 20
0
Compilation warning on 2.2.7a
It seems pretty typical that compilation warnings can be essentially ignored.
Be that as it may, if I can't find evidence that a warning can be ignored in
the archives, I am compelled to ask about it. A nod that these are OK or a
fix for them if they are not OK would be appreciated.
I am getting several warnings with winbind_nss.c :
Compiling nsswitch/winbind_nss.c with -fPIC
2001 Dec 05
2
OpenSSH compile problem on Solaris 8 & 9
Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this... the OpenSSH Mailing Lists
page is a little ambiguous.
I've tried to compile OpenSSH 3.0.1p1 & 3.0.2p1 on two different Solaris
platforms, one running Solaris 8 and the other Solaris 9 beta. It
configures fine, but the make dies:
gcc -I/opt/include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -I. -I.
-I/opt/include -I/opt/include
2004 Sep 03
7
Dropping incompatible voice frame
Hi: i have a problem.
Mi extensions.conf:
exten => _N.,1,Setvar(VOICEMAILREQ=${EXTEN})
exten => _N.,2,SetAccount(${customer})
exten => _N.,3,SetCDRUserField(${VOICEMAILREQ:1})
exten => _N.,4,ResponseTimeout(5)
exten => _N.,5,Background(ifyou)
exten => _N.,6,Background(silence/1)
exten => _N.,7,Background(ifyou)
exten => _N.,8,Background(silence/5)
exten
2010 Jun 01
1
debugfs.ocfs2 and Feature Incompat
Hi!
When i'm running debugfs.ocfs2 i get the following result:
debugfs.ocfs2 -R "stats" /dev/sdb
Revision: 0.90
Mount Count: 0 Max Mount Count: 20
State: 0 Errors: 0
Check Interval: 0 Last Check: Mon May 10 12:17:37 2010
Creator OS: 0
Feature Compat: 3 backup-super strict-journal-super
Feature Incompat: 8016 sparse
2006 Apr 03
0
Anybody success using Asterisk 1.2.6 and SpanDSP 0.0.3 pre 6?
Hi,
I am able to use SpanDSP 0.0.2 (all pre version) with Asterisk 1.2.6 to
recieve fax successfully. Today I tried to change to SpanDSP 0.0.3 pre 6
but I just couldn't complie the app_rxfax and txfax application. The
SpanDSP 0.0.3 was successfully complied though.
I'm running it on Debian. I've searched the space for the answer,
there're so many people asked this but I just
2003 Mar 26
0
Solaris 9 sparc, Forte C compile errors (2_2 branch)
Still compile errors on Solaris 9 (Ultra Sparc in 64bit mode)
Forte C, 2_2 branch from CVS as of about 11am UK time.
Only errors shown: -
rebuilding include/proto.h
Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -I/usr/local//include -I/usr/local//include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLOGFILEBASE="/usr/local/samba/var"