search for: incompatability

Hi Folks, I''ve got a 3.9 Tb zpool, and it is casing kernel panics on my Solaris 10 280r (SPARC) server. The message I get on panic is this: panic[cpu1]/thread=2a100a95cc0: zfs: freeing free segment (offset=423713792 size=1024) This seems to come about when the zpool is being used or being scrubbed - about twice a day at the moment. After the reboot, the scrub seems to have

Hy, I have currently a big problem with Win95 clients generating files with invalid inode types. This only happens with Quark documents created from scratch. Example: ?rwxrwxrwt 1 falkenbe av 35638891 Jul 29 16:02 /vol04/pc_03/Deerberg/ctp_Deerberg/test07 after copying the file it really is a file !! -rwxrwxrwx 1 schoenhe av 35638891 Jul 29 16:00

Hi, During the compilatin of xen i have the following error message: i8259.c:66:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:66:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[6]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:66:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:66:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[7]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:66:9: error:

Hi, During the compilatin of xen i have the following error message: i8259.c:66:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:66:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[6]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:66:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:66:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[7]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:66:9: error:

Hallo, Matt, Du meintest am 25.06.13: [compiling syslinux-6.00] >> Thanks - now it crashes later ... > What crash are you seeing? ------------- cite on ------------- [...] gcc -Wp,-MT,abort.o,-MD,./.abort.o.d -Os -march=x86-64 -falign- functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-labels=0 -ffast-math -fomit-frame- pointer -std=gnu99 -fno-stack-protector -fwrapv -freg-struct-return -

On Tue, 25 Jun, at 01:52:00PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Thanks - now it crashes later ... What crash are you seeing? > I don't have the ia64 files which are needed for a complete binary. But > maybe that's only my special problem. You shouldn't need ia64 files to build ia32 and x86-64 versions of gnu-efi or Syslinux. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Hi, I tried to compile the 2.6.9-22.EL kernel with reiserfs enabled. make fails as follows. anyone managed to compile with reiserfs successfully? CC [M] fs/reiserfs/stree.o fs/reiserfs/stree.c: In function `get_lkey': fs/reiserfs/stree.c:322: warning: return from incompatible pointer type fs/reiserfs/stree.c:325: warning: return from incompatible pointer type fs/reiserfs/stree.c:329:

I am unable to compile R packages from source on Ubuntu dapper/edgy. Does anybody have an experience? When I do install.packages("nlme",depend=TRUE), I get following error messages. Can someone help? I get similar messages for any package I try to compile. VR ------------- * Installing *source* package 'nlme' ... ** libs gcc -I/usr/share/R/include -I/usr/share/R/include

SCO Open Server Enterprise 5.06, Samba-2.2.8a I received the following compile errors: smbd/server.c line 302 argument is incompatible with prototype: arg #3 smbd/password.c line 664, argument is incompatible with prototype: arg #1 libsmb/clirap.c line 114 argument is incompatible with prototype arg #9 line 114 argument is incompatible with prototype arg#11

1 hour ago I downloaded llvm-3.6.0-rc4-win32.exe from http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.6.0/ . I tried to compile simple C code that just print "hello" , but it didn't compile , because clang.exe can't find . when I use clang-cl.exe with the same code , it worked . I also have the same problem with clang++ even with , I add -I flag to GCC (4.9.1) C++ headers , the result:

Hi everyone, I am trying to install colorspace (needed as part of my favourite ggplot2) on R v 2.7.0 running under ubuntu 7.04. The package is provided as source files and the compilation fails as below. I suspect this might be a problem with gcc v3/v4 incompatibility (or anything else), but I don't really know how to resolve it. Any advice will be appreciated - or perhaps somebody has got

Dear All, I have just updated R to the version 2.6.2 on F8 (with the official F8 rpm). However, when running as root the following command: update.packages(checkBuilt=T) I get a bunch of errors like the ones below. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Paul ----------------------------------------------- * Installing *source* package 'nlme' ... ** libs gcc -m32 -std=gnu99 -I/usr/include/R

Hi, I am trying to compile R-2.2.1 on Solaris 2.9 with a 64-bit build. Following the instructions in "R Installation and Adminstration", I changed the following settings in "config.site": CC="gcc -m64" F77="g77 -64" CXX="g++ -m64" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib/sparcv9 -L/usr/local/lib" But I got the following error messages:

Sun's Forte C 6.2 Solaris 9 (sparc64), CVS of 2.2 as of Weds 13th March about 1130 UK time CC=cc ./configure --with-readline=/usr/local/ --with-quotas --with-utmp --with-acl-support --with-syslog --with-libsmbclient --with-automount --without-winbind Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -I/usr/local//include -I/usr/local//include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE

It seems pretty typical that compilation warnings can be essentially ignored. Be that as it may, if I can't find evidence that a warning can be ignored in the archives, I am compelled to ask about it. A nod that these are OK or a fix for them if they are not OK would be appreciated. I am getting several warnings with winbind_nss.c : Compiling nsswitch/winbind_nss.c with -fPIC

Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this... the OpenSSH Mailing Lists page is a little ambiguous. I've tried to compile OpenSSH 3.0.1p1 & 3.0.2p1 on two different Solaris platforms, one running Solaris 8 and the other Solaris 9 beta. It configures fine, but the make dies: gcc -I/opt/include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -I. -I. -I/opt/include -I/opt/include

Hi: i have a problem. Mi extensions.conf: exten => _N.,1,Setvar(VOICEMAILREQ=${EXTEN}) exten => _N.,2,SetAccount(${customer}) exten => _N.,3,SetCDRUserField(${VOICEMAILREQ:1}) exten => _N.,4,ResponseTimeout(5) exten => _N.,5,Background(ifyou) exten => _N.,6,Background(silence/1) exten => _N.,7,Background(ifyou) exten => _N.,8,Background(silence/5) exten

Hi! When i'm running debugfs.ocfs2 i get the following result: debugfs.ocfs2 -R "stats" /dev/sdb Revision: 0.90 Mount Count: 0 Max Mount Count: 20 State: 0 Errors: 0 Check Interval: 0 Last Check: Mon May 10 12:17:37 2010 Creator OS: 0 Feature Compat: 3 backup-super strict-journal-super Feature Incompat: 8016 sparse

Hi, I am able to use SpanDSP 0.0.2 (all pre version) with Asterisk 1.2.6 to recieve fax successfully. Today I tried to change to SpanDSP 0.0.3 pre 6 but I just couldn't complie the app_rxfax and txfax application. The SpanDSP 0.0.3 was successfully complied though. I'm running it on Debian. I've searched the space for the answer, there're so many people asked this but I just

Still compile errors on Solaris 9 (Ultra Sparc in 64bit mode) Forte C, 2_2 branch from CVS as of about 11am UK time. Only errors shown: - rebuilding include/proto.h Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -I/usr/local//include -I/usr/local//include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLOGFILEBASE="/usr/local/samba/var"