Displaying 20 results from an estimated 53 matches for "includefiles".
Did you mean:
includefile
2006 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM build error
Hi,
While attempting to build the LLVM code from CVS today using gcc 4.1, I
encountered the following error. Any idea how to proceed with the build?
llvm[2]: Linking Debug executable llvm-as
/home/ll/programs/source/scm/cvs/llvm/Debug/lib/libLLVMAsmParser.a(llvmAsmParser.o):
In function `__static_initialization_and_destruction_0':
2006 Jun 24
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM build error
It looks to me like your libLLVMSupport.a didn't get built or you didn't
update all of LLVM. Please make sure you update from the root of the
tree with the command:
cvs update -ARPd
Reid.
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 13:16 +0100, Lexington Luthor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While attempting to build the LLVM code from CVS today using gcc 4.1, I
> encountered the following error. Any idea
2008 Sep 05
3
Still confused on content blocks...
I''ve read the docs. Honestly. But, I still can''t get my site working
with the latest gem. I''m confused over when and how I need to specify
content blocks, and how these relate to the stuff in config.yaml.
The specific problem is with my analytics file include, I get errors like this:
An error has occurred: Error while processing
</analytics.en.html>: Error
2008 Mar 15
2
new webgen plugin : google analytics
Hi all
In order to add visit tracking to my webgen site, i''ve written a
google analytics plugin which, given a google analytics key,
automatically includes tre required javascripts.
Requirements :
in your page template, put {googleAnalytics: key: your_google_key}
just before your <body> tag.
And that''s all.
The code is the following :
2006 Jul 25
1
[LLVMdev] Dubious Library Dependencies
Now that we have a "-why" option to the GenLibDeps.pl utility (which is
used by llvm-config to deduce library dependencies), a review of the
output has led to a few dubious library dependencies. Here they are:
All of the following dependencies are singletons (the dependent library
depends on only a single symbol from the dependency library):
libLLVMCodeGen.a:
2013 Dec 05
5
man page
It seems to me that the man page is not complete.
Personally, I had to read the code to understand. Propose to
amend paragraph of included files on:
-i GUEST-PATH=HOST-PATH, --include GUEST-PATH=HOST-PATH
File (HOST-PATH) to copy into custom dir
(GUEST-PATH).
-I HOST-PATH, --includefile=HOST-PATH
Copy all files listed in inputfile into the
appropriate temporary sandbox directories. File
2004 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Fix for non-standard variable length array + Visual C X86 specific code
Chris Lattner wrote:
> Can you explain what goes wrong without the stub? It's the only part that
> I didn't apply.
The X86 backend doesn't get registered since there are no references to
symbols in X86TargetMachine the object file is never pulled in from the
library I create, and thus the static intializer for the RegisterTarget
is never called...
2004 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Fix for non-standard variable length array + Visual C X86 specific code
Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> There was a similar problem some time ago, and was resolved with alloca.
> I think it's a better solution to use the stack instead of the heap...
I tend to agree, but the constructors won't get called if it's an object
array -- anyway, this particular case there was no objects, just
pointers and bools so alloca should be fine. I'll leave it to
2004 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Fix for non-standard variable length array + Visual C X86 specific code
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Morten Ofstad wrote:
> Chris Lattner wrote:
> > Can you explain what goes wrong without the stub? It's the only part that
> > I didn't apply.
>
> The X86 backend doesn't get registered since there are no references to
> symbols in X86TargetMachine the object file is never pulled in from the
> library I create, and thus the static
2006 Jun 02
2
[LLVMdev] Status on llvm-g++ -> llc -> C backend
Hello, Chris.
You wrote Friday, June 2, 2006, 9:27:25 PM:
CL> I don't see that failure. We'll need more info to reproduce the issue.
Got fixed by adding the folowing line in ther early beginning of
LowerAllocations.cpp file:
static IncludeFile CUFENP((void*)createUnifyFunctionExitNodesPass);
--
With best regards,
Anton mailto:asl at math.spbu.ru
Friday,
2009 Apr 03
3
[LLVMdev] build error on libLLVMSystem.a without any useful error message
Hi all, llvm doesn't seems to build but it doesn't give me any useful
error message :
nraynaud at macaron-2:~/Desktop/geek/llvm-svn/build$ make
llvm[1]: Compiling Alarm.cpp for Debug build
llvm[1]: Compiling Disassembler.cpp for Debug build
llvm[1]: Compiling DynamicLibrary.cpp for Debug build
llvm[1]: Compiling Host.cpp for Debug build
llvm[1]: Compiling IncludeFile.cpp for Debug build
2009 Apr 03
2
[LLVMdev] build error on libLLVMSystem.a without any useful error message
Thanks for your help Dale,
I got a little bit more clue (in snipped the begining the build messages) :
ar cru /Users/nraynaud/Desktop/geek/llvm-svn/build/Debug/lib/libLLVMSystem.a
/Users/nraynaud/Desktop/geek/llvm-svn/build/lib/System/Debug/Alarm.o
/Users/nraynaud/Desktop/geek/llvm-svn/build/lib/System/Debug/Disassembler.o
2009 Apr 03
0
[LLVMdev] build error on libLLVMSystem.a without any useful error message
make VERBOSE=1 might tell you something. Apparently the shared
library link is failing for some reason.
On Apr 2, 2009, at 5:45 PMPDT, Nicolas Raynaud wrote:
> Hi all, llvm doesn't seems to build but it doesn't give me any useful
> error message :
> nraynaud at macaron-2:~/Desktop/geek/llvm-svn/build$ make
> llvm[1]: Compiling Alarm.cpp for Debug build
> llvm[1]:
2004 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Fix for non-standard variable length array + Visual C X86 specific code
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Morten Ofstad wrote:
> To reduce the number of mails, I also include my next patch -- X86
> specific code and inline assembly for Visual C, unfortunately I had to
> use the nasty IncludeFile trick again to get the linker to work..
I applied most of this here:
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041018/019493.html
Can you explain what goes
2006 Jun 02
0
[LLVMdev] Status on llvm-g++ -> llc -> C backend
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Hello, Chris.
> You wrote Friday, June 2, 2006, 9:27:25 PM:
> CL> I don't see that failure. We'll need more info to reproduce the issue.
> Got fixed by adding the folowing line in ther early beginning of
> LowerAllocations.cpp file:
>
> static IncludeFile CUFENP((void*)createUnifyFunctionExitNodesPass);
I committed
2008 May 30
0
[LLVMdev] Possibly Vista-related Windows/MinGW Compilation Issues
Greetings,
I seem to be butting up against what may be a Vista-related issue for mingw-based compilation. I did some googling earlier today and found these steps: http://blogs.tedneward.com/2008/02/24/Building+LLVM+On+Windows+Using+MinGW32.aspx, which I followed. But try as I did, I couldn't seem to get past the "tools" section of the compilation. It seemed to always have
2002 Dec 10
2
include-exclude patterns
Hi,
I just subscribe to ask you a question about patterns in exclude-include
files.
I just want some folders to be rsynced to a remote machine.
What I tried is :
IncludeFile
-------------------------
/etc/
/var/lib/zope/
- /*
-----------------------
result of
$$ rsync -avvrn --delete --delete-excluded
--include-from=/backup-include -e ssh / /backup
is
expand file_list to 4000 bytes, did move
2006 Jun 02
1
[LLVMdev] Status on llvm-g++ -> llc -> C backend
Thanks Anton and Chris, it works.
On a side note is there a way to have llc preserve function names upon
output to C so that external CPP files that link this file in will be able
to find the correct functions. And how about name mangling? I assume this is
something not taken care of by llc or at least from llvm-g++ to bytecode.
Ashwin
On 6/2/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
2003 Apr 23
1
trying to get incremental backups working
So I'm trying to write up a short script to do some backups over rsync.
The goal is to have multiple client machines push the backups to the
backup server nightly. The backup server will have a complete copy of the
selected directories as well as revisions for the last 7 days.
Here is the brief script I have. Btw if you're wondering about all the
variables, I eventually want to set it to
2006 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVM build error
Reid Spencer wrote:
> It looks to me like your libLLVMSupport.a didn't get built or you didn't
> update all of LLVM. Please make sure you update from the root of the
> tree with the command:
>
> cvs update -ARPd
>
> Reid.
>
Thanks for the quick response.
I have resolved my problem already - basically I had "-s" in my
CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS environment which