search for: include_next

...e.h-t warn-on-use.h && sed -n -e '/^.ifndef/,$p' < ../build-aux/warn-on-use.h > warn-on-use.h-t && mv warn-on-use.h-t warn-on-use.h rm -f fcntl.h-t fcntl.h && { echo '/* DO NOT EDIT! GENERATED AUTOMATICALLY! */'; sed -e 's|@''INCLUDE_NEXT''@|include_next|g' -e 's|@''PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER''@|#pragma GCC system_header|g' -e 's|@''NEXT_FCNTL_H''@|<fcntl.h>|g' -e 's|@''GNULIB_FCNTL''@|1|g' -e 's|@''GNULIB_OPEN''@|1|g'...

...l/clang7/bin/clang -I"/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/include" -DNDEBUG -I/usr/local/clang7/include/c++/v1 -fPIC -Wall -g -O2 -c mcmb.c -o mcmb.o In file included from mcmb.c:11: /usr/local/clang7/include/c++/v1/stdio.h:108:15: fatal error: 'stdio.h' file not found #include_next <stdio.h> ^~~~~~~~~ My first thought was I should install Simon?s clang-7.0.0 and gfortran-6.1 packages which I dutifully did. The next thought was to update my ~/.R/Makevars file to: CC=/usr/local/clang7/bin/clang CXX=/usr/local/clang7/bin/clang++ LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/clang7...

...l/clang7/bin/clang -I"/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/include" -DNDEBUG -I/usr/local/clang7/include/c++/v1 -fPIC -Wall -g -O2 -c mcmb.c -o mcmb.o In file included from mcmb.c:11: /usr/local/clang7/include/c++/v1/stdio.h:108:15: fatal error: 'stdio.h' file not found #include_next <stdio.h> ^~~~~~~~~ My first thought was I should install Simon?s clang-7.0.0 and gfortran-6.1 packages which I dutifully did. The next thought was to update my ~/.R/Makevars file to: CC=/usr/local/clang7/bin/clang CXX=/usr/local/clang7/bin/clang++ LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/clang7...

...building r54494 on 64bit linux and had the same (no > include path) > error. Any idea what's happening here? > No. :-( Could you try Mike's suggestion? (Replicated here) Try adding: #define _GCC_LIMITS_H_ to limitx.h like so: #ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H +#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_ #include_next <limits.h> #undef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H and then testing. A good test would do a -dM -E and seeing if everything is still defined and checking the testcase mentioned in the original email thread.

I think this error is due to these changes: Doing diffs in .: --- ./gsyslimits.h.~1~ 2006-11-26 12:31:50.000000000 -0800 +++ ./gsyslimits.h 2007-04-02 12:37:38.000000000 -0700 @@ -4,5 +4,3 @@ instead of this text. */ #define _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H /* tell gcc's limits.h to recurse */ -#include_next <limits.h> -#undef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H --- ./limitx.h.~1~ 2006-11-26 12:31:48.000000000 -0800 +++ ./limitx.h 2007-04-02 13:51:40.000000000 -0700 @@ -1,12 +1,11 @@ /* This administrivia gets added to the beginning of limits.h if the system has its own version of limits.h. */ -/* We use...

...ual header > search path used. > > There are few wrinkles here, because these are preprocessor tokens. > Sure, but I was thinking of nabbing the actual string after macro expansion. Clang's PresumedLoc.getIncludedLoc() points to the post-macro expansion buffer. > - What about #include_next ? > - #include <Foo/Foo.h> does not mean {include path ...}/Foo/Foo.h for > Apple's framework header. > - Some IDEs, like Xcode, uses header maps. If you're curious search > HeaderMaps in clang FE. > > The dwarf line table should be able to encode directory names. I...

Hi all, I'm having some trouble building llvm-gcc as of today, with and without bootstrap. The error I get is: /home/kooijman/src/llvm-gcc/obj/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/kooijman/src/llvm-gcc/obj/./gcc/ -B/home/kooijman/src/llvm-gcc/obj/../install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/kooijman/src/llvm-gcc/obj/../install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem

...if /* NBDKIT_STRNDUP_H */ > diff --git a/common/replacements/syslog.h b/common/replacements/syslog.h > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..e4d76677 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/common/replacements/syslog.h > +#include <config.h> > + > +#ifdef HAVE_SYSLOG_H > + > +#include_next <syslog.h> I guess our insistence on a decent compiler (for other reasons such as __attribute__((cleanup))) means we can rely on #include_next ;) > +++ b/common/replacements/getdelim.c > @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ > +/* $NetBSD: getdelim.c,v 1.2 2015/12/25 20:12:46 joerg Exp $ */ > +/* N...

...lly want for a file is to enter the actual name of the header that the preprocessor found between "" or <> on the #include line, and for the directory it should be the actual header search path used. There are few wrinkles here, because these are preprocessor tokens. - What about #include_next ? - #include <Foo/Foo.h> does not mean {include path ...}/Foo/Foo.h for Apple's framework header. - Some IDEs, like Xcode, uses header maps. If you're curious search HeaderMaps in clang FE. The dwarf line table should be able to encode directory names. I am not sure, what is the adv...

...es. michael at x071:[/data/prj/aixtools/github/dovecot/src/x071-test]/data/prj/aixtools/github/dovecot/gnulib/gnulib-tool --dry-run --import getopt-posix Module list with included dependencies (indented): absolute-header extensions extern-inline getopt-posix gettext-h include_next snippet/arg-nonnull snippet/c++defs snippet/warn-on-use ssize_t stddef sys_types unistd File list: lib/arg-nonnull.h lib/c++defs.h lib/getopt-cdefs.in.h lib/getopt-core.h lib/getopt-ext.h lib/getopt-pfx-core.h lib/getopt-pfx-ext.h lib/getop...

I've been looking into the debug info in llvm recently. After conferring with a DWARF expert, I think what we really want for a file is to enter the actual name of the header that the preprocessor found between "" or <> on the #include line, and for the directory it should be the actual header search path used. I started by taking a look at how LLVM encodes this in a .s file

> to limitx.h like so: > > #ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H > +#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_ > #include_next <limits.h> > #undef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H This fixes this problem for me on Ubuntu Hardy on x86-64. John

...search for these two file by 'locate'. Only find them: /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9/system_wrappers/X11/Intrinsic.h /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9/system_wrappers/X11/Xlib.h And there are nothingin these two files. : Xlib.h? #pragma GCC system_header #pragma GCC visibility push(default) #include_next <X11/Xlib.h> #pragma GCC visibility pop Intrinsic.h #pragma GCC system_header #pragma GCC visibility push(default) #include_next <X11/Intrinsic.h> #pragma GCC visibility pop Them I install libX11-devel and reinstall xorg-x11-proto-devel. But still can't find Xlib.h and Intrinsic.h...

...nclude path) >> error. Any idea what's happening here? >> > No. :-( Could you try Mike's suggestion? (Replicated here) > > Try adding: > > #define _GCC_LIMITS_H_ > > to limitx.h like so: > > #ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H > +#define _GCC_LIMITS_H_ > #include_next <limits.h> > #undef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H > > and then testing. A good test would do a -dM -E and seeing if > everything is still defined and checking the testcase mentioned in the > original email thread. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers...

...om /Users/stephan/Software/llvm/build/./bin/../include/c++/v1/ios:214: > In file included from /Users/stephan/Software/llvm/build/./bin/../include/c++/v1/iosfwd:95: > /Users/stephan/Software/llvm/build/./bin/../include/c++/v1/wchar.h:119:15: fatal error: 'wchar.h' file not found > #include_next <wchar.h> > ^~~~~~~~~ > 1 error generated. Am I missing anything like setting up an appropriate environment, or passing appropriate values for some cmake -D configuration switches?

...e/stddef.h. # clang++ -std=c++17 -isystem /include test.cpp In file included from test.cpp:2: In file included from /bin/../include/c++/v1/limits:106: In file included from /bin/../include/c++/v1/type_traits:406: /bin/../include/c++/v1/cstddef:45:15: fatal error: 'stddef.h' file not found #include_next <stddef.h> ^~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. I'm scratching my hair trying to understand what is wrong and what should I do here. Also, I can't understand why CMake adds all these -isystem include directories. But this is a webkit issue I guess. Any ideas/recommandations...

...double-slash-root dup2 errno error exitfail extensions fchdir fclose fcntl fcntl-h fcntl-safer fdopendir filevercmp float fts full-write getcwd getdtablesize getopt-gnu getopt-posix gettext-h hash hash-pjw i-ring include_next inline intprops inttypes lchown lstat malloc-posix memchr mempcpy memrchr mkdir multiarch open openat openat-die openat-safer realloc-posix rmdir safe-read safe-write same-inode save-cwd size_max ssize_t...

Hi Matthijs, >> I did put in a hack, but it was horrible. It might be a good idea to >> test out Mike's suggestion to see if it's a better way of doing it. > I just tried building llvm-gcc without your hack, and it still works (even > without the fix Mike suggested). > > So, it seems that r54245 can be reverted again? > > I didn't test bootstrap, however,

I've just tried building r54494 on 64bit linux and had the same (no include path) error. Any idea what's happening here? Thanks, -David Shipman On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Matthijs, > >>> I did put in a hack, but it was horrible. It might be a good idea to >>> test out Mike's suggestion to see if

...ulrunner-sdk-1.9/sdk/include: mozilla-config.h mozilla-config32.h prtypes.h The include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9 constains those above header files, I did link to them, but xulrunner-sdk-1.9/system_wrappers/prtypes.h has a problem as well: #pragma GCC system_header #pragma GCC visibility push(default) #include_next <prtypes.h> #pragma GCC visibility pop At final, I could not compile VLC plugin with the xulrunner-sdk-1.9/sdk. Please advice how to fix it and where could I install a proper sdk? Thank you. Kind regards, Jim