search for: incluces

On 02/07/12 12:03 am, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Dave Yeo wrote: > >> This commit will break OS/2's EMX 0.9d library (GCC 2.8.1) which has been >> been replaced by klibc. Considering the age of EMX and lack of testing >> and that klibc contains so many improvements I think this is exceptable. > > Sorry Dave, I can't do that. Or rather sorry, the patch

Hello one more time, As others seem to already asked without reply, I''m getting lower speed rates than specified via ingress. How do I know. Because I have this in my script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress # Filter intranet traffic, so fit it to intranet speed tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \ match ip src $Q_2_HOSTS \ match ip dst

Dave Yeo wrote: > Another try Actually there are still some issues with this patch, mainly around your changes to incluce/FLAC/ordinals.h. This file is a public header file and hence, your changes: diff --git a/include/FLAC/ordinals.h b/include/FLAC/ordinals.h index 80d055b..dc2dafc 100644 --- a/include/FLAC/ordinals.h +++ b/include/FLAC/ordinals.h @@ -32,10 +32,18 @@

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/08/12 01:32 am, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Dave Yeo wrote: > >> Another try > > Actually there are still some issues with this patch, mainly > around your changes to incluce/FLAC/ordinals.h. This file is a > public header file and hence, your changes: Sorry about that, forgot that it is a public header. [...] >

Hi, How do I enable FAST_SHARE_MODES? In UNIX_INSTALL.html I found (...) See also the FAST_SHARE_MODES option in the Makefile (...) but in my Makefile I didn't found this Flag, even though I read somewhere that this Flag is set as default when compiled for Linux systems. Where and how exactly do I set this Flag? I have a Linux SuSE 8.0 on x86, but when I call 'smbclient -L

Hi Mark, I haven't done it, but I've played with the scenario enough to have an idea. What you want to do is have Outlook auth via NTLM to Dovecot.? First that means having the machine be a domain member (usually via Samba) in order to properly process NTLM/Kerberos handshake - which it appears you have. Second that means having Dovecot know how to accept NTLM authentication (SPA) to

As I get older, hopefully wiser, I try and look at ways I can make a contribution to various causes that I believe in. Examples would incluce my alma maters, various legal or political groups (that share or advocate my views), or other groups of "right thinking" people, to name a few. Of one in particular, open soucre comes to mind. And, within the relm of open source, Samba in

More info ... My dovecot error log shows: Sep 05 16:45:19 auth: Debug: client in: AUTH 1 NTLM service=imap Sep 05 16:45:19 auth: Debug: client passdb out: OK 1 user=mark at hprs original_user=mark at HPRS Sep 05 16:45:19 auth: Debug: master in: REQUEST 998899713 10219 1 f56352c207cb8f6dea4d264b2c0f8dc1 session_pid=10220 request_auth_token Sep 05

Rick et al, The link you gave was a start, but is targeted for Samba3 and is assuming a probably Windows [SBS]Server AD/DC separate from the DC hosting dovecot, and includes setting up kerberos. I'm using a Samba4 AD/DC with integrated kerberos (so I don't think there is any setup I can do there). Nevertheless I've followed the instructions otherwise; specifically adding to

Hmm.? I would expect to see 'mark at hprs.com'.? Whatever your full domain name is. It also won't look up /etc/shadow - Samba is doing the AD->Unix UID mapping.? Your AD users shouldn't be in there when all is said and done.? Well, at when I did a Samba4 install as a DC it still behaved like a Samba3 member, and there were no AD users in the local unix passwd files. What does

Comments interspersed with yours ... --Mark -----Original Message----- > Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 20:00:11 -0500 > From: Rick Romero <rick at havokmon.com> > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: Re: How to "Windows Authenticate" > > Hmm. I would expect to see 'mark at hprs.com'. Whatever your full domain > name is. Full user at domain would be

More experimentation ... I tried removing userdb and passdb from the dovecot NTLM config. That didn't work. I then tried adding a static userdb as follows: userdb { driver = static # allow_all_users = yes args = gid=100 home=/home/HPRS/%n } (Interestingly, when I uncommented "allow_all_users" I got an "unsupported setting" [or something like that], even though that

I've been using Dovecot 2.2.15 as the IMAP server for Outlook (2010/2013) on Windows workstations for over 6 months with no problems. Dovecot is hosted on the office Samba4 AC/DC server. I have been using auth_mechanisms plain login, and passdb driver = shadow. What I'd like to do now is use the "Windows Authenticated" login so I don't have to have separate passwords for

If I had time I would be all over this - but IMHO the main problem is that Dovecot != Exchange.? Even in small environments - unless I'm out of date, there's no calendar, tasks or contact lists within Dovecot. Your next best best is to use something like Horde that would allow you to auth via ActiveSync (on Outlook 2013 clients) and manage everything else that the users will want, with

Rick, I extremely dislike Exchange as well. I have a long list of problems: near impossibility to monitor logs for trouble, poor configurable spam checking, no good way to archive and review emails ... I could go on for paragraphs, but the main reason we recently migrated away from SBS/Exchange is that Microsoft no longer sells Small Business Server and its replacement, Server Essentials, does

guestfsd calls many different tools. Keeping track of all of them is error prone. This patch introduces a new helper macro to put the command string into its own ELF section: GUESTFSD_EXT_CMD(C_variable, command_name); This syntax makes it still possible to grep for used command names. The actual usage of the collected list could be like this: objcopy -j .guestfsd_ext_cmds -O binary