search for: incent

Hi, I'm trying to set up AR(1) as a correlation structure in modeling some data (attached file data.txt in text format) with lme, but have trouble getting it to work. Incent, Correctness, and Oppor are 3 categorical variables, Beta is a response variable, and Time is an equally-spaced variable with 6 time points (treated as a categorical variable as well). Basically I want to model the correlation with AR(1) or even ARMA along those 6 time points. First, how is the ord...

...some of those companies ended up instituting a prize program after all, a few years later). For example, some people said, "This just encourages people to find exploits and then they might use those exploits to do harm." (The problem with this is if someone has sufficient black-hat incentives for finding an exploit -- either to do malice, or more likely to sell it on the black market -- those incentives *already* exist, so the prize program wouldn't create any additional incentive to use an exploit illegally.) Would you feel safer using CentOS if a bounty program encouraged...

Hello Ingo, On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Ingo Schwarze <schwarze at usta.de> wrote: > > Hi Emmanuel, > > Emmanuel Deloget wrote on Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:26:47AM +0200: > > > * the openssl team has no real incentive to propose a shim ; > > If major application projects refuse to support their new release, > thus putting pressure on operating system distributions to not > completely switch to 1.1 either, that is not an incentive? Yes and no. The fact is that openssl is widely used by tons of pro...

...; > > Thanks, > > > > SteveT > > > Steve, Your version of Samba is too old, it only understands SMBv1, > any way you can upgrade Samba ? > > Rowland I hope so. The Void Linux packagers just confirmed that they're shipping 8 year old 3.6.25_14, have little incentive to update, and consider Samba "a complex system designed originally to replace AD, it has lots of moving parts and usually includes a lot of vendored libs". Ugh! So I'll need to do it myself. A couple questions: 1) Is it true that 4.9.4 is the latest stable release? 2) What is...

Hi I have been keen to get involved with programming for a while and have dabbled here and there as part of college tasks etc, but I have never had the incentive to 'keep it up' - so to speak! Being a Linux user, I have been looking for something to get me started in programming on a more serious level where my efforts would equally be appreciated. Then, having used and read about Wine quite a bit, I wondered about whether I could get involved i...

...to adapt it to the process I outline above ; furthermore I think there might be other issues than the double free [5] in the code, but I have to double or triple check my intuition here, as I kind of always get wrong when I state something like this). My opinion is: * the openssl team has no real incentive to propose a shim ; moreover such an "official" shim is not guaranteed to be used by downstream. * an independant openssl shim project is likely to fail -- it stills require a large amount of work for downstream projects as they still need to adapt their code to the new openssl API. *...

...ould like to request that SYSLINUX be extended to install on a filesystem image file on the Windows platform. This feature is available on Linux (option -t); however, on Windows SYSLINUX only installs with a raw device path. This feature would be use by another open source project. As an small incentive, I'll offer a small, token bounty ($50) for the developer that implements and successfully merges the code into the SYSLINUX source code repository. - Phil

...Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > > Not everyone can upgrade to the latest version of the toolchain, even > if it has been released for a while. We did drop MSVC 2012 support > early, but MSVC 2015 was in RC or RTM stages by that point, and we had > some pretty big incentive to upgrade early (without function templates > supporting default arguments, the AST matcher DSL made for really slow > compiles of Clang itself, and resulted in a larger executable size > among other things, IIRC). I know you mentioned that one of the reasons we upgraded to 2013 was...

...works with NAs. In matrices only numberic and not character sub-setting works with NAs. Potentially this in itself can also be a source of bugs, or, at least surprises. > Setting names() on a matrix is a rarely used feature that has practically no positive and no negative consequences. I see no incentive to change the behavior and break existing code. When writing this message I had the opposite opinion. That this 2nd point is one of the most bug-probe points of all 3. As I would assume most users setting names() on a matrix would only do it by accident. > In my opinion adding these feature...

I have a controller that gets a list of employees (which has an "include => [:salaries, :incentives, :billablegoals, :reviews]"). I then need it to iterate through each employee and determine their current active goal based on the "effective date." After playing around with it a bunch, I got the following to work. Only problem is that if I remove the "@employees.each { |e...

...ally > > 50/50 on this ever since I submitted the question to Slashdot > > (see http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/27/1650256 ). > > Interesting thead. I think your issues are with software developers. The > > hardware guys are using the decoder, and they have no incentive to > make do something bizarre that would make it incompatible with what > the core encoder implementation outputs. But in thinking about the > software end, I think back to the ARC vs. ZIP. If a particular > implementation becomes very popular, the author would have plenty of &...

...tch again, it applies with 'patch -p0'. >> >> Also try to build on x86-32, x86-64 is not quite ready yet. >> > Actually, I made one small change to the patch. I kept -Werror in > Makefile.common.in. It's better if we fix these warnings; -Werror > provides incentive for that. > > I'll consider removing it if there's a problem that's not trivially > fixable. That leaves us with the aliasing violations. I looked at the first, and I couldn't tell why gcc (4.3.4) thinks it is wrong: safecode/runtime/BitmapPoolAllocator/PoolAllocatorBit...

...re is something I strongly disagree with. To layout a couple of benefits that no one has mentioned so far: 1) This is a highly visible clue as to what Google is running internally (admittedly, we don't know for what). Given how secretive companies tend to be about such things, providing an incentive (upstreaming) to talk publicly about internal infrastructure is valuable. I could see that being very useful to academics evaluating hardware ideas for instance. 2) Just because a backend generates code which isn't "officially" runnable doesn't mean there aren't people...

...onnection would nearly eliminate the possibility of a > man-in-the-middle attack either hijacking the session or surreptitiously > switching bits mid-stream and changing the traffic on the fly. A man-in-the-middle attack is not easy to pull off. If you can show me why some person would be incented to attack someone like this, then maybe there is a case for it. As it stands, if you want to change the data, it's much easier to break into the directory server itself than it would be to perform a man in the middle attack in my opinion. Or easier to break into the source computer and do i...

...#39;d like to > hear other peoples' thoughts on the matter as well. Not everyone can upgrade to the latest version of the toolchain, even if it has been released for a while. We did drop MSVC 2012 support early, but MSVC 2015 was in RC or RTM stages by that point, and we had some pretty big incentive to upgrade early (without function templates supporting default arguments, the AST matcher DSL made for really slow compiles of Clang itself, and resulted in a larger executable size among other things, IIRC). I recall we had frequent build breaks from MSVC 2012 not supporting basic C++11 langua...

http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.3.4 SECURITY ADVISORIES * CVE-2006-4095 CERT Vulnerability Note VU#915404 NISCC 172003 * CVE-2006-4096 CERT Vulnerability Note VU#697164 NISCC 172003 * CAN-2005-0034 NISCC-UNIRAS 20050125-00059 CERT Vulnerability Note VU#938617 [ODiP] == Dmitry Grigorovich

...> > Attached the patch again, it applies with 'patch -p0'. > > Also try to build on x86-32, x86-64 is not quite ready yet. > Actually, I made one small change to the patch. I kept -Werror in Makefile.common.in. It's better if we fix these warnings; -Werror provides incentive for that. I'll consider removing it if there's a problem that's not trivially fixable. -- John T. > Best regards, > --Edwin >

On 12/18/18 4:02 AM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > <snip> > > HTH > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > I am just curios how much do they pay you for advertising them in all your posts to this mail list. Or what is different - non-monetary - incentive you have for doing so? Valeri > Nux! > www.nux.ro > <snip> -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 +++++++++...

On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 12:15, Fr?d?ric Bri?re wrote: > I've been running ices2 like this 24/7 for months now, only restarting > it once a week for log rotation. Never had a problem since. setting <logsize> will cause an automatic log rotation when a certain file size has been reached. It renames <logfile> to <logfile>.1 then opens a new file <logfile> karl.

...4? If either of these are true, it would save a heck of a lot of work, instead of having to rejoin a couple hundred clients to the domain. Thanks much, -Ken P.S. Kudos on whoever thought of the Python scripting hooks. While I don't "speak" Python, it would certainly be a strong incentive to learn it!