Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "incassessible".
2016 Mar 25
2
Re: www.centos.org/forums/
...sers that are unable to use SSL{2,3} as well as TLS1.0, not just
disabled via config, but this decission was made at compile time.
Newer Android and Apple-iOS devices for example.
And the point is not that the site supports TLS1.0, but that it does
not support TLS1.1 and/or TLS 1.2, and as such is incassessible
to devices that ask for TLS1.1 as minimum for HTTPS.
But that is for the admins/webmasters of the servers to resolve.
- Yamaban
2016 Mar 26
1
www.centos.org/forums/
...eloper.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html
You cannot just support the latest version of a client if your site is
accessed by regular users out there.
>
>> And the point is not that the site supports TLS1.0, but that it does
>> not support TLS1.1 and/or TLS 1.2, and as such is incassessible
>> to devices that ask for TLS1.1 as minimum for HTTPS.
>>
>> But that is for the admins/webmasters of the servers to resolve.
>
>
> Many sites are still using centos 5 and clones and cannot support tls 1.2
> and tls 1.1 without upgrade.
Then they might be forced to...
2016 Mar 25
0
www.centos.org/forums/
...was made at compile time.
> Newer Android and Apple-iOS devices for example.
>
>
This is not true. it works fine with latest android and ios. I just tested
it.
> And the point is not that the site supports TLS1.0, but that it does
> not support TLS1.1 and/or TLS 1.2, and as such is incassessible
> to devices that ask for TLS1.1 as minimum for HTTPS.
>
> But that is for the admins/webmasters of the servers to resolve.
Many sites are still using centos 5 and clones and cannot support tls 1.2
and tls 1.1 without upgrade.
--
Eero
2016 Mar 25
5
www.centos.org/forums/
Hi List,
Does anyone know why the above URL is still using TLS V1.0.
I can't connect to it unless I enable TLS V1.0 which I was under the impression that it should not be used
anymore.
Thanks for any enlightenment.
Steve
--