search for: incassessible

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "incassessible".

2016 Mar 25
2
Re: www.centos.org/forums/
...sers that are unable to use SSL{2,3} as well as TLS1.0, not just disabled via config, but this decission was made at compile time. Newer Android and Apple-iOS devices for example. And the point is not that the site supports TLS1.0, but that it does not support TLS1.1 and/or TLS 1.2, and as such is incassessible to devices that ask for TLS1.1 as minimum for HTTPS. But that is for the admins/webmasters of the servers to resolve. - Yamaban
2016 Mar 26
1
www.centos.org/forums/
...eloper.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html You cannot just support the latest version of a client if your site is accessed by regular users out there. > >> And the point is not that the site supports TLS1.0, but that it does >> not support TLS1.1 and/or TLS 1.2, and as such is incassessible >> to devices that ask for TLS1.1 as minimum for HTTPS. >> >> But that is for the admins/webmasters of the servers to resolve. > > > Many sites are still using centos 5 and clones and cannot support tls 1.2 > and tls 1.1 without upgrade. Then they might be forced to...
2016 Mar 25
0
www.centos.org/forums/
...was made at compile time. > Newer Android and Apple-iOS devices for example. > > This is not true. it works fine with latest android and ios. I just tested it. > And the point is not that the site supports TLS1.0, but that it does > not support TLS1.1 and/or TLS 1.2, and as such is incassessible > to devices that ask for TLS1.1 as minimum for HTTPS. > > But that is for the admins/webmasters of the servers to resolve. Many sites are still using centos 5 and clones and cannot support tls 1.2 and tls 1.1 without upgrade. -- Eero
2016 Mar 25
5
www.centos.org/forums/
Hi List, Does anyone know why the above URL is still using TLS V1.0. I can't connect to it unless I enable TLS V1.0 which I was under the impression that it should not be used anymore. Thanks for any enlightenment. Steve --