search for: inarguably

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "inarguably".

Did you mean: unarguably
2009 May 25
1
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
...the makefiles that cmake creates, I looked at the llvm I could download, the tarball llvm-2.5.tar.gz, both at the Makefile that was originally supplied AND the one that's there after you do a configure. They both have "ifeq" constructs right up at the top of the Makefile, which are inarguably not BSD Make compatible. They ARE GNU Make compatible, I don't really understand CMake well enough to comment on that. Under another email, I described the easiest way to tell if a Makefile is or isn't BSD/GNU Make compatible. > not configure. > > > Best regards, > --Edwi...
2019 Oct 05
5
should base R have a piping operator ?
Yes but this exageration precisely misses the point. Concerning your examples: * I love fread but I think it makes a lot of subjective choices that are best associated with a package. I think it changed a lot with time and can still change, and we have great developers willing to maintain it and be reactive regarding feature requests or bug reports *.group_by() adds a class that works only (or
2009 May 24
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
On 2009-05-24 20:38, Chuck Robey wrote: > Óscar Fuentes wrote: > >> Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: >> >> >>>> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on >>>> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is >>>> missing. >>>>
2019 Oct 06
1
should base R have a piping operator ?
On 05/10/2019 7:50 p.m., Gabriel Becker wrote: > Hi all, > > I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with > each "side". > > The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a > core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out) > largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad > thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimation > that Ant...
2019 Oct 07
4
should base R have a piping operator ?
...unwind-protection if implemented in C). Best, Lionel > On 6 Oct 2019, at 01:50, Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with > each "side". > > The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a > core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out) > largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad > thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimation > that Ant...
2019 Oct 05
0
should base R have a piping operator ?
Hi all, I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with each "side". The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out) largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimation that Ant is correct that the...
2013 Jun 18
5
[Bug 829] New: Should not need to turn on --verbose to --list to show interface
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=829 Summary: Should not need to turn on --verbose to --list to show interface Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo:
2019 Oct 07
0
should base R have a piping operator ?
...t, > Lionel > > >> On 6 Oct 2019, at 01:50, Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with >> each "side". >> >> The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a >> core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out) >> largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad >> thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimation &...
2019 Oct 06
1
should base R have a piping operator ?
...hat's easier to use with pipes than without. Best Joris On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 1:50 AM Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with > each "side". > > The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a > core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out) > largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad > thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimation > that Ant...
2009 May 24
3
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: > >>> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on >>> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is >>> missing. >> They absolutely do work, even on FreeBSD-current( I run that here), >> but not using the native make (the
2019 Oct 07
0
[External] Re: should base R have a piping operator ?
...est, > Lionel > > >> On 6 Oct 2019, at 01:50, Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with >> each "side". >> >> The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a >> core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out) >> largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad >> thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimation &...
2011 Aug 10
8
Universal syntax for Markdown
Hi, because of the great editor "Writer" from Information Architects I've learned about Markdown and I love it. But it's very confusing, that there are so many standards with different features: classical Markdown, Markdown Extra, MultiMarkdown. I think for most users and the spreading of Markdown it would be nice, to have only one syntax. And this universal syntax should have
2006 Feb 03
9
dhclient in 6.0
hi all... again... i sent this message to general questions but nobody got excited about it. i just installed 6 on my t30 laptop. brand new. when trying dhclient i get: DHCPDISCOVER on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 this trys 6 times then this shows up: No DHCPOFFERS received. No working leases in present database - sleeping. i run a tcpdump while requesting a lease and for