Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "inargu".
Did you mean:
inarg1
2009 May 25
1
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
...the makefiles that cmake creates,
I looked at the llvm I could download, the tarball llvm-2.5.tar.gz, both at the
Makefile that was originally supplied AND the one that's there after you do a
configure. They both have "ifeq" constructs right up at the top of the
Makefile, which are inarguably not BSD Make compatible. They ARE GNU Make
compatible, I don't really understand CMake well enough to comment on that.
Under another email, I described the easiest way to tell if a Makefile is or
isn't BSD/GNU Make compatible.
> not configure.
>
>
> Best regards,
> --...
2019 Oct 05
5
should base R have a piping operator ?
Yes but this exageration precisely misses the point.
Concerning your examples:
* I love fread but I think it makes a lot of subjective choices that are
best associated with a package. I think it
changed a lot with time and can still change, and we have great developers
willing to maintain it and be reactive
regarding feature requests or bug reports
*.group_by() adds a class that works only (or
2009 May 24
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
On 2009-05-24 20:38, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>
>> Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes:
>>
>>
>>>> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on
>>>> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is
>>>> missing.
>>>>
2019 Oct 06
1
should base R have a piping operator ?
On 05/10/2019 7:50 p.m., Gabriel Becker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with
> each "side".
>
> The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a
> core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out)
> largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad
> thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimation
> that...
2019 Oct 07
4
should base R have a piping operator ?
...unwind-protection if implemented in C).
Best,
Lionel
> On 6 Oct 2019, at 01:50, Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with
> each "side".
>
> The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a
> core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out)
> largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad
> thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimation
> that...
2019 Oct 05
0
should base R have a piping operator ?
Hi all,
I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with
each "side".
The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a
core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out)
largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad
thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimation
that Ant is correct that...
2013 Jun 18
5
[Bug 829] New: Should not need to turn on --verbose to --list to show interface
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=829
Summary: Should not need to turn on --verbose to --list to show
interface
Product: iptables
Version: 1.4.x
Platform: i386
OS/Version: RedHat Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: iptables
AssignedTo:
2019 Oct 07
0
should base R have a piping operator ?
...t,
> Lionel
>
>
>> On 6 Oct 2019, at 01:50, Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with
>> each "side".
>>
>> The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a
>> core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out)
>> largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad
>> thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimati...
2019 Oct 06
1
should base R have a piping operator ?
...hat's
easier to use with pipes than without.
Best
Joris
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 1:50 AM Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with
> each "side".
>
> The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a
> core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out)
> largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad
> thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimation
> that...
2009 May 24
3
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes:
>
>>> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on
>>> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is
>>> missing.
>> They absolutely do work, even on FreeBSD-current( I run that here),
>> but not using the native make (the
2019 Oct 07
0
[External] Re: should base R have a piping operator ?
...est,
> Lionel
>
>
>> On 6 Oct 2019, at 01:50, Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with
>> each "side".
>>
>> The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a
>> core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out)
>> largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its a good or bad
>> thing that they think that doesn't change the fact that by my estimati...
2011 Aug 10
8
Universal syntax for Markdown
Hi,
because of the great editor "Writer" from Information Architects I've
learned about Markdown and I love it. But it's very confusing, that
there are so many standards with different features: classical
Markdown, Markdown Extra, MultiMarkdown. I think for most users and
the spreading of Markdown it would be nice, to have only one syntax.
And this universal syntax should have
2006 Feb 03
9
dhclient in 6.0
hi all... again...
i sent this message to general questions but nobody got excited about
it.
i just installed 6 on my t30 laptop. brand new. when trying dhclient i
get:
DHCPDISCOVER on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5
this trys 6 times then this shows up:
No DHCPOFFERS received.
No working leases in present database - sleeping.
i run a tcpdump while requesting a lease and for