Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "inaddr6_ani".
Did you mean:
inaddr6_any
2023 Aug 05
2
Question on simultaneous IPv4 and IPv6 "any address" listening
Cheers all,
TL;DR version:
I've recently found that at least on my test box the `LISTEN *` line had
only set up an IPv4 `0.0.0.0` listener but not an IPv6 `::0` listener for
`upsd`. In fact, at least on a "dual-stack" system, it seems impossible to
bind to both - so depending on binding order I either lose IPv6 or lose
IPv4 directly (but have it practically as IPv4-over-IPv6).
2023 Aug 05
2
Question on simultaneous IPv4 and IPv6 "any address" listening
Cheers all,
TL;DR version:
I've recently found that at least on my test box the `LISTEN *` line had
only set up an IPv4 `0.0.0.0` listener but not an IPv6 `::0` listener for
`upsd`. In fact, at least on a "dual-stack" system, it seems impossible to
bind to both - so depending on binding order I either lose IPv6 or lose
IPv4 directly (but have it practically as IPv4-over-IPv6).
2023 Aug 05
1
Question on simultaneous IPv4 and IPv6 "any address" listening
Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes:
> I've recently found that at least on my test box the `LISTEN *` line had
> only set up an IPv4 `0.0.0.0` listener but not an IPv6 `::0` listener for
> `upsd`.
Interesting. On one system I checked, I have 4 explicit directives for
127.0.0.1, ::1, and the LAN on v4/v6. On another, I have an empty
2023 Aug 05
1
Question on simultaneous IPv4 and IPv6 "any address" listening
Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes:
> I've recently found that at least on my test box the `LISTEN *` line had
> only set up an IPv4 `0.0.0.0` listener but not an IPv6 `::0` listener for
> `upsd`.
Interesting. On one system I checked, I have 4 explicit directives for
127.0.0.1, ::1, and the LAN on v4/v6. On another, I have an empty
2023 Aug 06
1
Question on simultaneous IPv4 and IPv6 "any address" listening
Thanks to everyone for a fruitful discussion, links and ideas.
The result is nearing a merge at
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/2013 and seems to not upset CI
on any platform, including Windows (which behaves funny WRT binding to the
same host:port as many times as you ask).
Ultimately the chosen logic is that if there was a `LISTEN * <port>` in
`upsd.conf`, the depending on
2023 Aug 06
1
Question on simultaneous IPv4 and IPv6 "any address" listening
Thanks to everyone for a fruitful discussion, links and ideas.
The result is nearing a merge at
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/2013 and seems to not upset CI
on any platform, including Windows (which behaves funny WRT binding to the
same host:port as many times as you ask).
Ultimately the chosen logic is that if there was a `LISTEN * <port>` in
`upsd.conf`, the depending on