search for: in_user

Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >> > 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >> > specifically for net and block (note the new names). So why not a transport feature? Is it just because the SCSI commands for virtio-blk also require a config space field? Sorry if I missed this upthread. Paolo >> > 3) I note the

Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >> > 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >> > specifically for net and block (note the new names). So why not a transport feature? Is it just because the SCSI commands for virtio-blk also require a config space field? Sorry if I missed this upthread. Paolo >> > 3) I note the

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> writes: > Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>> > 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >>> > specifically for net and block (note the new names). > > So why not a transport feature? Is it just because the SCSI commands > for virtio-blk also require a config space

Il 20/06/2013 04:40, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> writes: >> Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>>>> 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >>>>> specifically for net and block (note the new names). >> >> So why not a transport feature? Is it just

Il 20/06/2013 04:40, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> writes: >> Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>>>> 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >>>>> specifically for net and block (note the new names). >> >> So why not a transport feature? Is it just

Documentation/memory-barriers.txt says: Mandatory barriers should not be used to control SMP effects, since mandatory barriers unnecessarily impose overhead on UP systems. This rule applies to virtio, so let's do it correctly. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Documentation/memory-barriers.txt says: Mandatory barriers should not be used to control SMP effects, since mandatory barriers unnecessarily impose overhead on UP systems. This rule applies to virtio, so let's do it correctly. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

virtio is communicating with a virtual "device" that actually runs on another host processor. Thus SMP barriers can be used to control memory access ordering. Where possible, we should use SMP barriers which are more lightweight than mandatory barriers, because mandatory barriers also control MMIO effects on accesses through relaxed memory I/O windows (which virtio does not use)

virtio is communicating with a virtual "device" that actually runs on another host processor. Thus SMP barriers can be used to control memory access ordering. Where possible, we should use SMP barriers which are more lightweight than mandatory barriers, because mandatory barriers also control MMIO effects on accesses through relaxed memory I/O windows (which virtio does not use)

Currently virtio-net code relys on the layout of descriptor, this patchset removed the assumptions and introduced a control command to set mac address. Last patch is a trivial renaming. V2: check guest's iov_len V3: fix of migration compatibility make mac field in config space read-only when new feature is acked V4: add fix of descriptor layout assumptions, trivial rename V5: fix

Currently virtio-net code relys on the layout of descriptor, this patchset removed the assumptions and introduced a control command to set mac address. Last patch is a trivial renaming. V2: check guest's iov_len V3: fix of migration compatibility make mac field in config space read-only when new feature is acked V4: add fix of descriptor layout assumptions, trivial rename V5: fix

From: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> Currently virtio-net code relys on the layout of descriptor, this patchset removed the assumptions and introduced a control command to set mac address. Last patch is a trivial renaming. V2: check guest's iov_len V3: fix of migration compatibility make mac field in config space read-only when new feature is acked V4: add fix of descriptor layout

From: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> Currently virtio-net code relys on the layout of descriptor, this patchset removed the assumptions and introduced a control command to set mac address. Last patch is a trivial renaming. V2: check guest's iov_len V3: fix of migration compatibility make mac field in config space read-only when new feature is acked V4: add fix of descriptor layout

From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Add a linked list of all virtqueues for a virtio device: this helps for debugging and is also needed for upcoming interface change. Also, add a "name" field for clearer debug messages. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> --- including this Rusty's patch here for completeness.

From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Add a linked list of all virtqueues for a virtio device: this helps for debugging and is also needed for upcoming interface change. Also, add a "name" field for clearer debug messages. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> --- including this Rusty's patch here for completeness.

Hi, I have installed Asterisk 1.4 with mISDN with the install-asterisk.tar.gz script from beronet.com. On my system I have two cards, one a AVM Frit!Card Pci 2.0 and one HFC-S chip. I know both to work well with mISDN on my system from a previous installation. Now however, the AVM card works well at first glance, i.e. it "registers" incoming calls and works through the asterisk

This patch-set introduces the CAIF Virtio Link layer. The purpose is to communicate with a remote processor (a modem) over shared memory. Virtio is used as the transport mechanism, and the Remoteproc framework provides configuration and management of the Virtio rings and devices. The modem and Linux host may be on the same SoC, or connected over a shared memory interface such as LLI. Zero-Copy

This patch-set introduces the CAIF Virtio Link layer. The purpose is to communicate with a remote processor (a modem) over shared memory. Virtio is used as the transport mechanism, and the Remoteproc framework provides configuration and management of the Virtio rings and devices. The modem and Linux host may be on the same SoC, or connected over a shared memory interface such as LLI. Zero-Copy

Add a new vq, cmdq, to handle requests between the device and driver. This patch implements two commands sent from the device and handled in the driver. 1) VIRTIO_BALLOON_CMDQ_REPORT_STATS: this command is used to report the guest memory statistics to the host. The stats_vq mechanism is not used when the cmdq mechanism is enabled. 2) VIRTIO_BALLOON_CMDQ_REPORT_UNUSED_PAGES: this command is used

Well, I''m working on adding a new type of user (organization) to my application, using a different database table than the standard User table (in the end, I think it works out being easier to deal with than creating another column in the original User table for account type). However, I''m running into a user registration problem. I can register both types of users fine,