Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "in_fence_handl".
Did you mean:
in_fence_handle
2018 Jan 12
1
[PATCH 0/3] drm/tegra: Add support for fence FDs
...ynchronization. But we can do that
using the SYNCOBJ IOCTLs already, so there's not really a need for the
SUBMIT IOCTL to support emitting FDs, right?
Given that KMS and VIC are behind the same DRM device, would it be
reasonable to allow KMS to take a syncobj handle as in_fence_fd (perhaps
via in_fence_handle property)?
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20180112/28fe6624/attachment-0001.sig>
2018 Jan 12
2
[PATCH 0/3] drm/tegra: Add support for fence FDs
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:40:16AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Thierry Reding (2018-01-11 22:22:46)
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> >
> > This set of patches adds support for fences to Tegra DRM and complements
> > the fence FD support for Nouveau. Technically this isn't necessary for a
> > fence-based synchronization loop