search for: in_data

...with 1GB of RAM. Thanks for your attention, Danny ------------------------------------------- #Calculate Euclidean distances between two sets of matrices. library(foreign) library(fields) #centroid is small file with 100x50 centroid <- as.data.frame(read.spss("C:\\centroid.sav")) #in_data is 25000x50 in_data <- as.data.frame(read.spss("C:\\in_vars.sav")) #loop through the in_data records, calculate distances to the 100 centroids #sort the distances in ascending order and write out the centroid # and distance for all 100. for(i in 1:nrow(in_data)) { #first column i...

...rv_pipe_hnd.c:pipe_init_outgoing_data(160) pipe_init_outgoing_data: malloc fail. [2007/06/20 12:51:23, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_init(111) prs_init: malloc fail for 4280 bytes. [2007/06/20 12:51:23, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:make_internal_rpc_pipe_p(330) open_rpc_pipe_p: malloc fail for in_data struct. [2007/06/20 12:51:23, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(231) open_rpc_pipe_p: make_internal_rpc_pipe_p failed. [2007/06/20 12:51:23, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_init(111) prs_init: malloc fail for 4280 bytes. [2007/06/20 12:51:23, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:make_internal_r...

...* We have a WORD before the data counting the size, but > * cbInput is just this +2. > * However Photoshop 7 has a bug that sets cbInput to 2 less > than the > * length of the string, rather than 2 more. So we'll use the > WORD at > * in_data[0] instead. > */ > // if (!physDev->job.in_passthrough) { > // WriteSpool16(physDev->job.hJob, (LPSTR)psbegindocument, > sizeof(psbegindocument)-1); > // physDev->job.in_passthrough = TRUE; > // } > // return &...

...to prevent the front-end from promote to 32-bit multiplier? If that is not possible, how can I detect when lowering that it is actually a MUL_I8 or MUL_I16 in order to do the correct lowering? Thanks in advance, Pedro P.S: I add C code and corresponding LLVM code. C code: void (const u_int16_t in_data, u_int16_t* out) { u_int8_t kk = in_data&0xFF; u_int16_t kk16 = kk * kk; *out = kk16; } LLVM: %1 = load i8* %kk, align 1 %conv2 = zext i8 %1 to i32 %2 = load i8* %kk, align 1 %conv3 = zext i8 %2 to i32 %mul = mul nsw i32 %conv2, %conv3 %conv4 = trunc i32 %mul to i16 store...

First thing - I'd like to say a big "THANK YOU" to the developers. I just upgraded to samba-3.0.23 and I've noticed an alarming issue with respect to my configuration. I've been using the built-in keytab management and it looks like the updated code no longer creates the userPrincipal in Active Directory. Whether this is an issue for others or not, it would be nice to have

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 =============================================================== Done with Fish. -- John Laroche (Adaptation) =============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 =============================================================== Done with Fish. -- John Laroche (Adaptation) =============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version