search for: in_bounds

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "in_bounds".

2008 Jun 12
4
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
...li 3, 135 2676: cmplwi 2, 18, 0 2677: bl trace_bytecode 2678: beq 2, BB10_219 # null546 2679: BB10_43: # not_null547 2680: lwz 3, 8(18) 2681: cmpw 0, 27, 3 2682: bge 0, BB10_220 # out_of_bounds 2683: BB10_44: # in_bounds 2684: slwi 26, 27, 1 2685: add 26, 26, 18 2686: lis 21, 3984 2687: lhz 14, 12(26) 2688: ori 4, 21, 6828 2689: li 3, 136 2690: bl trace_bytecode 2691: ori 4, 21, 6556 2692: li 3, 138 2693: bl trace_by...
2008 Jun 11
3
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
Hi all, I'm trying to figure out a weird bug I'm seeing. I'm hoping it's something simple in my IR but I can't see anything wrong so I'm hoping someone here can see something. I'm using LLVM to compile Java bytecode into native functions. My code keeps track of the Java local variables in an array of llvm::Value pointers which get phi'd up at various points. The
2008 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
On 2008-06-11, at 13:16, Gary Benson wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Can you please attach IR which can be compiled to an executable >> (and shows the problem). > > I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling > them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way > I can get compilable IR from that?
2008 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
Duncan Sands wrote: > Can you please attach IR which can be compiled > to an executable (and shows the problem). I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way I can get compilable IR from that? Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/