search for: improveprob

As describe in the Hmisc package's improveProb function, that function is for binary Y. And it's best to use category-free methods. Frank Petergodsk wrote > Hi > > I'm new to R. > > Is it possible to use the improveProb function to generate categorybased > NRI using a Cox model? > I believe I saw someone mentio...

...Thanks to Frank Harrell for the great Design package. I noted from Pencina's Article (Statistics in Medicine Vol 27, pp157-172) that the result obtained for the Net Reclassification Index depends upon categorical cut-offs for risk (eg in the paper <6%, 6-20% and >20%). I wondered how the improveprob function arrives at its cut-offs, and whether there was any function to change the default cut-offs used. Thanks for any help you can offer. Yours sincerely David McAllister ***************************************************************** The information contained in this message may be confi...

Dear list, I am trying to work out how the improveProb() function works and how to interpret the results, and I have a few questions. I would be grateful if anyone could shed some light on these. in the Net Reclassification Improvement section of the output, is the 2P column the two-sided p-value for the differences in classification? So if a limit is...

Dear, I wanna to compare AUC generated by two distribution models using the same sample. The AUC for model 1 consists of two columns, column A for 0/1 and column B for probability, eahc with the same row number of 3000. The AUC for model 2 consists of two columns, column A for 0/1 and column B for probability, eahc with the same row number of 10000 rows. I am wondering what value I should put

Dear Sirs. I am working with the R packages Hmisc and PredictABEL to make NRI estimates from my Cox models with and without a specific biomarker. According to Pencina et al (Statistics in Medicine 2010, DOI: 0.1002/sim.4085 ), a continuous/non-categorical NRI (NRI>0) is to be used when there are no obvious reason to categorize risk, such as the risk of future cardiovascular events in patients

Dear R users Function improveProb in the rms library calculate NRI and IDI for predictions of binary outcome. Do anyone extent its use in survival data? Many thanks. *Yao Zhu* *Department of Urology Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai, China* [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear, I wanna to compare AUC generated by two distribution models using the same sample. I tried improveProb function's example code below. set.seed(1) library(survival) x1 <- rnorm(400) x2 <- x1 + rnorm(400) d.time <- rexp(400) + (x1 - min(x1)) cens <- runif(400,.5,2) death <- d.time <= cens d.time <- pmin(d.time, cens) rcorrp.cens(x1, x2, Surv(d.time, death)) #rcorrp.cens(x1, x...

Hi, I am trying to calculate net reclassification improvement (NRI) and Inegrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) for a survival dataset to compare 2 risk models. It seems that the improveProb() in Hmisc package does this only for binary outcome, while rcorrp.cens() does take survival object, but doesn't output NRI or IDI. Can anyone suggest any other packages that can calculate NRI and IDI for survival data? The reference for NRI extending to survival data is: Pencina MJ, D'Ago...

Dear all, I am interested to evaluate reclassification using net reclassification improvement and Integrated Discrimination Index IDI after survival analysis (Cox proportional hazards using stcox). I search a R package or a R code that specifically addresses the categorical NRI for time-to-event data in the presence of censored observation and, if possible, at different follow-up time points. I

Dear list   I have 5 markers that can be used to detect an infection in combination. Could you please advise me how to use functions in ROCR/ other package to produce the ROC curve for a combination of markers?   I have used the following to get ROC statistics for each marker. pred <- prediction(y$marker1, y$infectn) perf <-performance(pred,"tpr","fpr")

Dear, I wanna to compare AUC generated by two distribution models using the same sample. The AUC for model 1 consists of two columns, column A for 0/1 and column B for probability, eahc with the same row number of 3000. The AUC for model 2 consists of two columns, column A for 0/1 and column B for probability, eahc with the same row number of 10000 rows. I am wondering what value I should put

Dear all I am trying to compare the performances of several methods using the AUC0.1 and not the whole AUC. (meaning I wanted to compare to AUC's whose x axis only goes to 0.1 not 1) I came to know about the Mcneil Hanley test from Bernardo Rangel Tura and I referred to the original paper for the calculation of "r" which is an argument of the function cROC. I can only find the

Greetings, I have generated several ROC curves and would like to compare the AUCs. The data are cross sectional and the outcomes are binary. I am testing which of several models provide the best discrimination. Would it be most appropriate to report AUC with 95% CI's? I have been looking in to the "net reclassification improvement" (see below for reference) but thus far I can only