Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "improment".
Did you mean:
improvment
2006 Jan 16
2
speex dsp as a gstreamer plugin
Hi,
I'm porting speex as a DSP task to run using the DSP gateway project.
I have some results, but I still need some improments, because I'm still getting
some error messages in the mail box system... If someone wants to
help... it would
be useful.
2006/1/16, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org>:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:43:56PM +0100, Christophe Augier wrote:
>
> > i'm not an expert in dsp but i'...
2006 Jan 17
1
speex dsp as a gstreamer plugin
2006/1/17, Christophe Augier <christophe.augier@gmail.com>:
> > I'm porting speex as a DSP task to run using the DSP gateway project.
> > I have some results, but I still need some improments, because I'm still getting
> > some error messages in the mail box system... If someone wants to
> > help... it would
> > be useful.
>
> that's some good news. I think I won't be of much help except for
> testing but i would be glad to invest some time in it....
2006 Jan 17
0
speex dsp as a gstreamer plugin
> I'm porting speex as a DSP task to run using the DSP gateway project.
> I have some results, but I still need some improments, because I'm still getting
> some error messages in the mail box system... If someone wants to
> help... it would
> be useful.
that's some good news. I think I won't be of much help except for
testing but i would be glad to invest some time in it.
What can of hardware are yo...
2019 Oct 29
2
After configured server signing, file transfer speed is very slow
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 04:46:21PM +0530, VigneshDhanraj G via samba wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I want to configure server signing as mandatory without reducing speed, but
> you have mentioned that remove the server signing.
> Can you please explain why 90% speed is reducing after configured server
> signing as mandatory?
Completely depends on your platform and OS. Are you using
2006 Jan 16
2
speex dsp as a gstreamer plugin
Hi,
i'm not an expert in dsp but i've seen there is some code to run speex
on omap C5X dsp so i was wondering what is the status of this code.
Actually my goal is to run a voip application which uses gstreamer on
an OMAP 5912 board. As there is already a speex codec for gstreamer, i
was wondering if this plugin can already use the dsp power or if there
is the need for a new plugin.
thank
2014 Nov 09
0
[RFC PATCH v1] arm: kf_bfly4: Introduce ARM neon intrinsics
...nsume/update 4 complex Fout values per cycle
+ * just like normal C code, except each neon
+ * instruction consumes 1 complex number (2 floats)
+ * In theory, one could use Q regs instead of
+ * D regs, but you need to consider case when N is odd
+ * One can do that if it justifies performance improment
+ */
+
+ for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
+ Fout_4[0] = vld1q_f32(ai);
+ ai += 4;
+ Fout_4[1] = vld1q_f32(ai);
+ ai += 4;
+ Fout_2[0] = vget_low_f32(Fout_4[0]);
+ Fout_2[1] = vget_high_f32(Fout_4[0]);
+ Fout_2[2] = vget_low_f32(Fout_4[1]);
+ Fout_2[3] = vget_high_f32(Fout_4[1]);
+
+ scratch_2...
2014 Nov 09
3
[RFC PATCH v1] arm: kf_bfly4: Introduce ARM neon intrinsics
Hello,
This patch introduces ARM NEON Intrinsics to optimize
kf_bfly4 routine in celt part of libopus.
Using NEON optimized kf_bfly4(_neon) routine helped improve
performance of opus_fft_impl function by about 21.4%. The
end use case was decoding a music opus ogg file. The end
use case saw performance improvement of about 4.47%.
This patch has 2 components
i. Actual neon code to improve