search for: implicitness

Hi, I'm trying to compile openssh2.3.0p1 on aix3.2.5. Can I ignore this list of warning messages? bsd-bindresvport.c: In function `bindresvport_af': bsd-bindresvport.c:94: warning: implicit declaration of function `bind' bsd-rresvport.c: In function `rresvport_af': bsd-rresvport.c:64: warning: implicit declaration of function `bzero' bsd-rresvport.c:82: warning: implicit

I shouldn't try to do this on Monday morning. Can anyone suggest why the make for R 0.63 is failing for me under Solaris (SunOS 5.6). Paul Gilbert ... creating src/scripts/html2dos creating tests/Makefile creating tests/Examples/Makefile creating src/include/Platform.h R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris2.6 Source directory: . Installation directory: /usr/local C

If I'm understanding what's going on in this test correctly, what's happening is: * ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall prefers indirect calls when a function is called at least 3 times in minsize * In thumb 1 (without -fno-omit-frame-pointer) we have effectively only 3 callee-saved registers (r4-r6) * The function has three arguments, so those three plus the register we need to hold the

Hi, I have attached WIP patch for adding foldMemoryOperand to Thumb1InstrInfo. For the following case: void f(int x, int y, int z) { void bar(int, int, int); bar(x, y, z); bar(x, z, y); bar(y, x, z); bar(y, y, x); } it calls foldMemoryOperand twice, and thus converts two calls from blx to bl. callMI->dump() shows the function name "bar" correctly, however in generated

Hi, Compiling attached test-case, which is reduced version of of uECC_shared_secret from tinycrypt library [1], with --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -march=armv6-m -Oz -S results in reloading of register holding function's address before every call to blx: ldr r3, .LCPI0_0 blx r3 mov r0, r6 mov r1, r5 mov r2, r4 ldr r3,

Hi, My understanding of a "dead" register is a def that is never used. However, when I dump the MI after reg alloc on a simple program I see the following sequence: ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64 0, 0, 0, *implicit-def dead %rsp*, implicit-def dead %eflags, implicit-def dead %ssp, implicit %rsp, implicit %ssp CALL64pcrel32 @foo, <regmask %bh %bl %bp %bpl %bx %ebp %ebx %rbp %rbx %r12 %r13 %r14

I am unable to compile R packages from source on Ubuntu dapper/edgy. Does anybody have an experience? When I do install.packages("nlme",depend=TRUE), I get following error messages. Can someone help? I get similar messages for any package I try to compile. VR ------------- * Installing *source* package 'nlme' ... ** libs gcc -I/usr/share/R/include -I/usr/share/R/include

Hi All, i'm on a debian linux 64bit, i'm tying to install the netcdf intraface, i tried both ncdf and ncdf4 but trying to build i received the error : (i have necdf installed on my machine and it is able to fiund it .. no missed .h) epy at epinux:~$ sudo R CMD INSTALL --configure-args="-with-netcdf_incdir=/usr/include -with-netcdf_libdir=/usr/lib" ncdf4_1.8.tar.gz *

Hi everyone, I am trying to install colorspace (needed as part of my favourite ggplot2) on R v 2.7.0 running under ubuntu 7.04. The package is provided as source files and the compilation fails as below. I suspect this might be a problem with gcc v3/v4 incompatibility (or anything else), but I don't really know how to resolve it. Any advice will be appreciated - or perhaps somebody has got

You are right about your interpretation of "dead". The case here is that RSP is a reserved register and so its liveness isn't really tracked. The "implicit-def dead" is an idiom used to mean that the register (reserved or not) is clobbered. The other implicit uses/defs can come from instruction definitions to indicate that this instruction uses and/or modifies a given

Dear All, I have just updated R to the version 2.6.2 on F8 (with the official F8 rpm). However, when running as root the following command: update.packages(checkBuilt=T) I get a bunch of errors like the ones below. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Paul ----------------------------------------------- * Installing *source* package 'nlme' ... ** libs gcc -m32 -std=gnu99 -I/usr/include/R

I have reached a development plateau and now want to integrate some of the rails niceties that I passed over to get the system online. I am fooling with migrations. I am using postgresql. I put in my migration script (at the end of the ''up'' method, the following raw sql code... # set up primary key restratints for PostgreSQL execute ''ALTER TABLE ONLY

Hi All, i'm on a debian linux 64bit, i'm tying to install the netcdf intraface, i tried both ncdf and ncdf4 but trying to build i received the error : (i have necdf installed on my machine and it is able to fiund it .. no missed .h) epy at epinux:~$ sudo R CMD INSTALL --configure-args="-with-netcdf_incdir=/usr/include -with-netcdf_libdir=/usr/lib" ncdf4_1.8.tar.gz *

Thank you for your reply! > Every MachineBasicBlock has a list of successors; you can access it with > the successors() accessor. That's what you should be using for any CFG > analysis. I am aware of these methods of class MachineBasicBlock, which allows one to access a MachineBasicBlock's successors and predecessors in the CFG. But the CFG itself may no longer be valid if a

Hi LLVM, I ran into a case where RegAlloc would insert a spill across instruction that had same register for output operand and implicit-def. The effect this had was that spill code would immediately overwrite the output result. Is this the expected result of setting up MyInst this way? In other words, does RegAlloc know to not insert spill in case it sees that output reg is same as one of

Hi Quentin, MyInst is a custom instruction that has implicit-defs of fixed registers. The implicit-defs are seen at the end of Instruction Selection. I'd like to add a report, but I am working on an out-of-tree backend based on 7.0. I can try to help reduce the testcase down. Filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41790 Regards, Kevin On 2019-05-07 3:45 p.m., Quentin Colombet wrote:

Hi, I had followed the installation-guide to festival http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+festival+installation speech-tools compiles OK, but I got this error when compiling asterisk if I compile without the patch it compiles, but of cause did'nt work with asterisk. any clue ? /Hans-Henrik Andresen Making in directory src/modules/base ... making dependencies -- modules.cc

Hi Tom, Thanks a lot for your explanations, now it makes a lot more sense ;) I had a slightly closer look at the R600 packetizer, and the issue is that the third LSHL instruction has both an implicit use and *afterwards* an implicit def of T1_XYZW. The latter def causes the current ScheduleDAGInstrs implementation to ignore the implicit use, thus the ScheduleDAG only contains an

I've looked into that and it's not going to be simple, unfortunately. Here's the original example again: --- name: fred tracksRegLiveness: true body: | bb.0: successors: %bb.1, %bb.2 J2_jumpt undef %p0, %bb.2, implicit-def %pc J2_jump %bb.1, implicit-def %pc bb.1: successors: %bb.3 %r0 = L2_loadruh_io undef %r0, 0 PS_storerhabs 0, killed

I'm seeing some sporadic build failures with 'make -j4'. The failures are: make[4]: *** No rule to make target 'hello.c32', needed by 'all'. Stop. I've only seen the failures with com32/samples/hello.c32 and com32/rosh/rosh.c32. I'm not a make expert, but I think it's due to missing dependencies. This patch seems to fix my failures, but I'm