Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2240 matches for "implicates".
2019 Feb 11
1
[Qemu-devel] security implications of caching with virtio pmem (was Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm "virtio pmem" device)
Hi Michael,
Thanks for looking into this and summarizing in detail.
> > This patch series has implementation for "virtio pmem".
> > "virtio pmem" is fake persistent memory(nvdimm) in guest
> > which allows to bypass the guest page cache. This also
> > implements a VIRTIO based asynchronous flush mechanism.
>
>
> At Pankaj's request
2019 Feb 04
5
security implications of caching with virtio pmem (was Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm "virtio pmem" device)
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 08:17:31PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> This patch series has implementation for "virtio pmem".
> "virtio pmem" is fake persistent memory(nvdimm) in guest
> which allows to bypass the guest page cache. This also
> implements a VIRTIO based asynchronous flush mechanism.
At Pankaj's request I looked at information leak
2011 Jan 04
2
Implications of zlib plugin on search operations
Right now I'm compressing all mails older than 31 days and larger than
100k in size.
But what implications does this compression have on search queries
performed by users (user looking for an old mail containing a certain
string).
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Gesch?ftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charit? - Universit?tsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203
2009 Oct 23
1
Implications of reducing MAX_PERIOD
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I have been looking into reducing memory usage of the CELTDecoder and
was wondering what the implications of reducing MAX_PERIOD were?
Reducing it to 512, I haven''t noticed any
2019 Feb 06
0
security implications of caching with virtio pmem (was Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm "virtio pmem" device)
On 04.02.19 23:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 08:17:31PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>> This patch series has implementation for "virtio pmem".
>> "virtio pmem" is fake persistent memory(nvdimm) in guest
>> which allows to bypass the guest page cache. This also
>> implements a VIRTIO based asynchronous flush
2015 Oct 21
0
Security implications of openssl098e on CentOS 7
Personally I would go round to that particular vendors office with a pipe
wrench and encourage them to do better however, unless this software is
transmitting credit card information then it seems that you could be
safe(ish) from the regulation standpoint. It really depends on the location
of the machine. Is it deep in the bowels of your high security nuclear
bunker on an air gap network or is is
2015 Oct 21
0
Security implications of openssl098e on CentOS 7
Remember that rhel/centos backports fixes, so just looking version number
is not reliable way to detect security issues.
Eero
2015-10-21 21:18 GMT+03:00 Nick Bright <nick.bright at valnet.net>:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm working with a new CentOS 7 installation, moving a system up from
> CentOS 5 due to OpenSSL version 0.9.8e not meeting PCI Compliance
> requirements.
>
2016 Jan 21
8
Windows 10 administrative templates /central store with Samba
Hi list,
This might or might not be a Samba related post. Feel free to ignore it
in case it is too far off-topic
My current understanding is that ...
a) I need those new templates in order to fully integrate Win10 clients
in an AD domain (i.e. with compatible policies).
b) I can only modify policies based on Win10 admx files from Win10
machines (i.e. with the RSAT tools for Win10).
Are there
2016 Jan 22
6
[GlobalISel][RFC] Contract between LLVM IR and the backends for ISel
Hi,
I would like your opinions on the contract we have between the LLVM IR and the backends.
* Context *
Right now, the backends are supposed to be able to perform instruction selection on any valid LLVM IR.
Although this is *not* something I want to change for GlobalISel, I thought I brought that up on the mailing list to discuss the implications.
In particular, in the past, some people
2016 Jan 21
1
Windows 10 administrative templates /central store with Samba
On 21.01.2016 15:51, James wrote:
> On 1/21/2016 9:39 AM, Ole Traupe wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> This might or might not be a Samba related post. Feel free to ignore
>> it in case it is too far off-topic
>>
>> My current understanding is that ...
>> a) I need those new templates in order to fully integrate Win10
>> clients in an AD domain (i.e.
2020 Jan 21
2
Security implications of using ControlMaster
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:08:51AM +1100, Damien Miller wrote:
> So IMO disallowing session multiplexing is at most a speedbump that an
> attacker will cross with relative ease. Speedbumps make sense sometimes,
An attacker getting root on the jumphost gets immediate control of
any _current_ persistent connections and new connections. Without
ControlMaster it's a _lot_ harder to take
2019 Feb 11
0
[Qemu-devel] security implications of caching with virtio pmem (was Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm "virtio pmem" device)
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:29:46AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> Hello Dave,
> Are we okay with this?
Sure.
I'm not sure I agree with all the analysis presented, but, well, I
haven't looked any deeper because I'm tired of being shouted at and
being called argumentative for daring to ask hard questions about
this topic....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
2019 Feb 11
1
[Qemu-devel] security implications of caching with virtio pmem (was Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm "virtio pmem" device)
On 11.02.19 23:29, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:29:46AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>> Hello Dave,
>> Are we okay with this?
>
> Sure.
>
> I'm not sure I agree with all the analysis presented, but, well, I
> haven't looked any deeper because I'm tired of being shouted at and
> being called argumentative for daring to ask hard
2015 Oct 21
0
Re: Security implications of openssl098e on CentOS 7
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:58, Nick Bright <nick.bright at ...> wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 1:55 PM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>> Personally I would go round to that particular vendors office with a pipe
>> wrench and encourage them to do better however, unless this software is
>> transmitting credit card information then it seems that you could be
>> safe(ish) from the
2016 Mar 21
2
change local & domain sids and implications
hi everybody
I'm thinking I'll grab whole lot of my ldap backend and
change SID - what will this cause to workstation/machine
members?
I'm guessing users account should be fine and people would
be able to log in but machine would probably have to rejoin
(if I can call it that, because domain name is different).
You probably already see what I'm hoping I can do - I hope I
can
2006 May 09
0
xend-config.sxp implications with changes to network-bridge
With the change to network-bridge in changeset 9955, would it also be
good to change xend-config.sxp to use:
# (network-script ''network-bridge vifnum=1'')
rather than
# (network-script ''network-bridge netdev=eth1'')
Should there also be more explanatory text?
Thanks,
Kirk
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
2008 Nov 23
0
not R but consumer choice contest that has statistical implications
a friend of mine sent me the following and I'm thinking that there are
people on this list that might be interested and could also hit the 10%
improvement mark possibly ? i don't know any more about it than the
article says so, if someone is interested, I guess you would have to
contact netflix. a "thank you for telling
me about it" gratuity on the prize money is of course
2001 Oct 15
0
Implications of 2.2.2 rpm
I'm trying to workout a fix for some XP issues that I'm having with the
2.2.0 rpm in redhat 7.0. What I'm wondering is...can I use the 2.2.2 rpm
that was built for 7.1? would it work? would I be in for even bigger
issues?
Current issues;
1) wIndows XP Win2K support
a)error joining domain
The computer could not be joined to the doamin because the following error
has occured:
the
2001 Oct 17
0
FW: Implications of 2.2.2 rpm
> I'm trying to workout a fix for some XP issues that I'm having with the
> 2.2.0 rpm in redhat 7.0. What I'm wondering is...can I use the 2.2.2 rpm
> that was built for 7.1? would it work? would I be in for even bigger
> issues?
>
> Current issues;
>
> 1) wIndows XP Win2K support
> a)error joining domain
>
> The computer could not be joined to
2003 Aug 21
0
security implications of joining machine to domain
Hi folks.
Can anybody give some facts about $SUBJECT? I have Samba3 running as PDC. I
joined my machines (windows and unix) to the domain using the configured
administrative account. Is the machine accounts created in this step given
kind of privilege 'boost' over common user accounts?
Supposed the client machine did not cache the entered administrative
credentials, is the machine