search for: implementors

Howdy- TL;DR An SSH daemon for a memory-constrained embedded platform didn't work with a recent OpenSSH client because it couldn't handle the payload size during key exchange. In general, what should SSH implementors in such limited environments do to ensure forwards compatibility with future OpenSSH releases? I am unable to SSH to any of my HP servers' iLO2 interfaces using OpenSSH 6.2p1. My particular problem looked similar to earlier compatibility problems between OpenSSH and mpSSH, the iLO2 SSH daemo...

This is a bit off topic, because I 'think' it isn't an Asterisk problem. However I'm not sure and anyhow I'm hoping someone may recognize the symptom. We moved offices a month ago. Our trusty SNOM190s (all between 3 and 5 years old) were packed up for the move, then unpacked a couple of weeks later. On unpacking them and connecting them to the new network, several of

...ust stay in read only mode and see if there's anything I > > can > > learn. > > Indeed - well said Ralph. I personally see this lists as kind > of a grab-bag of "All Things SMB" :-). > > There isn't really a forum for SMB 1/2/3 protocol users and > implementors (although samba-technical is probably a better > list for implementors) and this list is the closest thing > we have. > > We're all in this crazy protocol world together, and we > all do better when we help each other, even if Samba > isn't directly involved. We all know...

I recently added initial support for accurate GC to LLVM, as described in this document: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GarbageCollection.html I've started implementing a trivial copying collector as a testcase for it, but it is not done yet. All code generators support identification of roots on the stack though. If you're interested in such things, I would really appreciate feedback on

...describe whether > or not a given virtio device requires physical address or bus addresses. > > Is there a plan to get this incorporated into the virtio spec [1]? At the > moment, I can't see a working draft that includes the new bit. Having it > in the spec would help convince implementors that it's not just a Linux > thing. > > Thanks, > > Will > > [1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.0/cs04/virtio-v1.0-cs04.html Absolutely. Want to contribute a patch? -- MST

...describe whether > or not a given virtio device requires physical address or bus addresses. > > Is there a plan to get this incorporated into the virtio spec [1]? At the > moment, I can't see a working draft that includes the new bit. Having it > in the spec would help convince implementors that it's not just a Linux > thing. > > Thanks, > > Will > > [1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.0/cs04/virtio-v1.0-cs04.html Absolutely. Want to contribute a patch? -- MST

Hi, I'm new on this list, and just skimmed through the archives, so I appologize if this has been requested before. I read in the FAQ that you do not convert. LF to CR/LF because there is no sure way of knowing what type of file something is. I could see that this would cause problems if you converted a binary file or some other data file. But what if you assign a directory that would always

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021 --- Comment #3 from Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden at gmail.com> --- ping :-) ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

I've hit an odd issue in a test 1.8 deployment, playback() stalls mid file. The call stays up, but asterisk stops sending packets. It doesn't always happen - but on demo-congrats it happens about half the time. It only happens in IAX calls. Anyone else experienced it ? (I filed an issue just in case it isn't just me) T. Tim Panton - Web/VoIP consultant and implementor

I am interested in implementing a compiler very much like llvm but with very very modest goals. I just want to have a intermediate format(machine independent) which can be used as input/output by different passes.( much like the bytecode of llvm). The only thing is I want it to be much simpler compared LLVM, say only a very few basic optimizations. Other optimizations could be written and

...t;nice to have", as would better concurrency primitives. These are things I could Tackling the "still way too difficult" and "should be more batteries included" aspects of your post, I think that there is a lot of room for an LLVM subproject that provides a "language implementors toolbox" in the form of some really well documented and standardized runtime libraries that provide GC, synchronization, etc capabilities. Having them available and reusable (and sub-settable!) would allow code sharing across a wide range of different llvm language implementation. These are...

We already have something like what you describe in the form of mingw support. It runs on Windows and handles exceptions using a DWARF-style personality function and (I think) an LLVM-provided implementation of the libc++abi library. What this doesn't do is provide interoperability with MSVC-compiled objects. For instance, you can't throw an exception from MSVC-compiled code and catch

Hello guys, I have searched high and low, but not found any information about rules of using DTMF in SIP INFO method. Cisco has described something with Signal=, but it look like this feature is dependent on implementors? The problem is chan_sip.c cannot correctly translate received DTMF digits, especially #,*. At least with my Antek EGW-804 gateway. Looking into chan_sip.c, I found this code: line 3982 if (p->owner) { if (strlen(buf)) { if (sipdebug)...

On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 22:37:05 -0400 Jamie Jackson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thanks for the workaround, Luca. I might end up going with: > > #!/bin/bash > getent group | grep -q 'Domain Users' && exit 0 > echo "restarting winbind" > sudo systemctl restart winbind > > > Rowland, it crashed again. Here's some info.

I'm looking to connect a BMC 450 to an asterisk with a Digium Quad E1 card. Am I right in thinking that I'll need a special 'crossover-E1' RJ45 cable? If so, any clues where I might buy one in the UK? The Digium card sellers don't seem to stock such a thing. Thanks. Tim. Tim Panton - Web/VoIP consultant and implementor www.westhawk.co.uk

...ring follows the WAVE file format, rather than the Vorbis order of other Xiph codecs. This matches what flac has done for the existing mappings, and it allegedly what current tools like libavformat are doing. Please consider applying this patch to have a definitive statement on the channel map for implementors to follow. -r P.S. This doesn't update the flac command-line tool to enforce this mapping. That needs to be done as well, along with test files. -------------- next part --------------

Thanks, John. This sounds reasonable that the analysis group just provides an interface to its implementors (pass). Then I have another question, is it allowed to specify multiple pass in the same analysis group in the command line for opt? If yes, which pass will be used for the call of getAnaysis<AnalysisGroup>()? -Thomson On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:34 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois...

...es is overwhelming and the order in which they are specified seems important and I do not have the expertise to set that up. What I would like, is to set up the passes in exactly the same as clang -O2 or llvm-gcc -O2 do. Is there some way to get that behavior using the api below? How do language implementors do this in the LLVM environment? Thank you for any help. And thank you for this great tool. Brent FunctionPassManager OurFPM(TheModule); // Set up the optimizer pipeline. Start with registering info about how the // target lays out data structures. OurFPM.add(new TargetData(*TheExecut...

I was poking around in the Gentoo Linux repository yesterday, trying to satisfy my curiosity about how many programming languages there are in "common use" today. I found one called "Eleven" which is quite strangely similar in intent to Rails. The home page is http://eleven.sourceforge.net/. Eleven is much simpler than Rails, and there are some interesting ideas in it. To

After working fine for a week or so my new Quad E1 asterisk 1.8 system has started rejecting outbound calls from the Nortel BMC 450 it is connected to. The cli fills up with these: sig_pri.c: Ring requested on unconfigured channel 255/255 span 3 Is this likely to be a 1) config error 2) cable issue (I made them) 3) hardware problem with the Digium card 4) software (lib pri) Any clues?