search for: implemenetaion

<m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Ah. I don't remember if I was using csh, or ksh, and didn't realize about > bash. I *think* I vaguely remember that sh seemed to be more capable than > I remembered. If you like to check what the Bourne Shell did support in the late 1980s, I recommend you to fetch recent Schily tools from:

...gt; Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom Bourne Shell? > > http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/sh.html Heirloom did make quick and dirty ports and then stopped working. Heirloom e.g. did make the same attempt to port to platforms that may cause problems with own malloc() implemenetaions: - add a private malloc for sh internal use based on mmap(). This however caused problems with some Linux distros that have been reported against my old Bourne Shell port, so I assume the same problems exist with Heirloom. Heirloom added support for uname -S and for some linux ulimit extensio...