search for: implemenet

Mocha''s mock/stub framework has the ability to stub all methods on a mock given. Does RSpec''s mocking framework have this ability? And if not, is there some reason it shouldn''t be implemeneted? Regards, Scott

I have three Icecast-2.0.0 servers up with possibly more coming online. I am trying to figure out how to do more intelligent load balancing between the three. Problem: There are bandwidth restrictions at a couple of the locations. Current Solution: Round-robin DNS (with very low TTL) and a restriction on the number of listeners on the servers where bandwidth is an issue. I am finding this

...hould be transparent to clients and acheive the affect you want. You could also combine with with round robin DNS to spread people over the servers initially. Seems fairly elegant. Probably you want this configurable on a mount level not a global server level, but it shouldn't be too hard to implemenet. Just a config file addition plus some extra logic in the main connect loop, similar to what happens on a 404. jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-dev-req...

...you want. You could >> also combine with with round robin DNS to spread people over the servers >> initially. >> >> Seems fairly elegant. Probably you want this configurable on a mount >> level not a global server level, but it shouldn't be too hard to >> implemenet. Just a config file addition plus some extra logic in the >> main connect loop, similar to what happens on a 404. >> >> jack. >> --- >8 ---- >> List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ >> icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ >> To uns...

...s and acheive the affect you want. You could > also combine with with round robin DNS to spread people over the servers > initially. > > Seems fairly elegant. Probably you want this configurable on a mount > level not a global server level, but it shouldn't be too hard to > implemenet. Just a config file addition plus some extra logic in the > main connect loop, similar to what happens on a 404. Most people like to use 301 (moved permanently) for redirection, and this is the one most likely to be supported by client. If one desires to adhere to the standard pedantically, on...

...that it > works on Debian stable and other other releases with compilers, libraries, > ... that may be a few months and releases old. You didn't say which > Kubuntu you are running The latest, Dapper Drake (6.06). > -- but you may not have to follow Christian's way > as implemeneted in the stable port (and hence his way of dealing with > r-recommended as a big 'sumo' package). You could just install the CRAN > packages directly, or build from my Debian unstable sources (instead of > rebuilding on CRAN) -- a more 'offensive' approach. > > Anyway...