Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "implciilti".
Did you mean:
implciilty
2017 Jun 09
2
Subclassing LLVM Type
On 9 June 2017 at 15:29, Jajoo, Malhar via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Thanks for that , I have read the documentation on this , but I would like to know
> if it would be the right thing to do , ie , changing the enum within llvm::Type
Well, I find the idea of a non-canonical DummyType slightly disturbing
(I don't think it's something we'd ever support