search for: impe

Hi LLVMers, I have finally sorted out licensing issues and found some time, so I'm trying to port my PBQP register allocator to 2.4 in order to contribute it (if you want it). I've run into a bug that has me confused though. I'm currently failing the following assertion: llc: VirtRegMap.cpp:1733: void<unnamed>::LocalSpiller::RewriteMBB(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&,

On Sep 3, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Lang Hames wrote: > Hi LLVMers, > > I have finally sorted out licensing issues and found some time, so I'm > trying to port my PBQP register allocator to 2.4 in order to Nice! We would definitely welcome your contribution. > > contribute it (if you want it). I've run into a bug that has me > confused though. > > I'm currently

Hi ! I'm trying to modify the code in a machine function pass… I added a new basicblock and I want to add a jump to an another BB from my new BB. Here is my code : bool Obfuscation::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { MachineBasicBlock *newEntry = MF.CreateMachineBasicBlock(); MF.insert(MF.begin(), newEntry); std::vector<MachineBasicBlock*> origBB;

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:11:27 +0300 Bee Air via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Good day! > Test the dynamic DNS updates > > # samba_dnsupdate --verbose > IPs: ['200.2.2.15'] > Looking for DNS entry A dcs3.BEO.IMP 200.2.2.15 as dcs3.BEO.IMP. > Looking for DNS entry CNAME > 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb-251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as >

Hi Folks, I'm using the 'norm' package (based on Shafer's NORM) on some data. In outline, (X,Y) are bivariate normal, var(X)=0.29, var(Y)=24.4, cov(X,Y)=-0.277, there are some 900 cases, and some 170 values of Y have been set "missing" (NA). The puzzle is that, repeating the multiple imputation starting from the same random seed, I get different answers from the repeats

Good day! Test the dynamic DNS updates # samba_dnsupdate --verbose IPs: ['200.2.2.15'] Looking for DNS entry A dcs3.BEO.IMP 200.2.2.15 as dcs3.BEO.IMP. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb-251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb- 251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP. Looking for DNS entry NS BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as BEO.IMP. Looking for DNS entry NS

For the x86-64 target, I tried compiling a simple hello world. I don't understand the live interval information. Here's the machine instructions as dumped by LiveIntervalAnalysis: ********** MACHINEINSTRS ********** file hello.c line 3 b: 0 FNSTCW16m <fi#0>, 1, %NOREG, 0 FNSTCW16m <fi#0> 1 %mreg(0) 0 4 MOV8mi <fi#0>, 1, %NOREG, 1, 2 MOV8mi <fi#0> 1 %mreg(0) 1 2 8

I have the closed local network with two domain controllers on MS Windows Server 2008 R2 DC - 200.2.2.1 , DC1 - ip 200.2.2. <http://2.2.2.2/>2. Local domain - BEO.IMP I installed the domain controller on debian 12 (Samba 4.19.1-Debian) DCS3 - ip 200.2.2.15 ?onnected to the domain and AD according to the article

Dear List, I'm using gam in a multiple imputation framework -- specifying the knot locations, and saving the results of multiple models, each of which is fit with slightly different data (because some of it is predicted when missing). In MI, coefficients from multiple models are averaged, as are variance-covariance matrices. VCV's get an additional correction to account for how

On Jun 26, 2007, at 11:20 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > > 28 %AL<dead> = MOV8rr %reg1024<kill>, %EAX<imp-def> > MOV8rr %mreg(2)<d> %reg1024 %mreg(17)<d> > 32 CALL64pcrel32 <ga:printf>, %RDI<kill>, %RAX<imp-def>, %RCX<imp- > def,dead>, > %RDX<imp-def,dead>, %RSI<imp-def,dead>, %RDI<imp-def,dead>, >

Hi. I am trying to run LLVM with JIT on ARM processor (Android phone). Currently I have problems using external functions. Any call to external function crashes and gives me signal 11 (SIGSEGV) at some random address. I'm trying to run following C code: *** extern void add1(int* x); int main() { int a = 10; int b = 20; add1(&b); int c = a + b; return c; } *** It gives

Since the getelementptrs were implicitly generated by the CreateStore/Load I'm not sure how to get access to them. So I hacked the assignment to be done thrice: once using a manual decomposition into two GEPs and stores, once using the "big" CreateStore, once via the setGlobal function, printing addresses and memory contents at each point to the degree that I have access to them.

Evan, thanks for responding so quickly. On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:11, Evan Cheng wrote: > On Jun 26, 2007, at 11:20 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > > 28 %AL<dead> = MOV8rr %reg1024<kill>, %EAX<imp-def> > > MOV8rr %mreg(2)<d> %reg1024 %mreg(17)<d> > > 32 CALL64pcrel32 <ga:printf>, %RDI<kill>, %RAX<imp-def>, %RCX<imp- > >

Dear List, I'm getting an error in mgcv, and I can't figure out where it comes from. The setup is the following: I've got a fitted GAM object called "MI", and a vector of "prediction data" (with default values for predictors). I feed this into predict.gam(object, newdata = whatever) via the following function: makepred = function(varstochange,val){ for

Instead of the jpg image l write like this: DNS Master on the DC domain controller (Windows Server 2008 R2) DNS DC Reverse Lookup Zones beo.imp _msdsc dc domains gc pdc _sites .......... In the window - _msdsc

On Jun 26, 2007, at 12:57 PM, David Greene wrote: > Evan, thanks for responding so quickly. > > On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:11, Evan Cheng wrote: >> On Jun 26, 2007, at 11:20 AM, David A. Greene wrote: >>> 28 %AL<dead> = MOV8rr %reg1024<kill>, %EAX<imp-def> >>> MOV8rr %mreg(2)<d> %reg1024 %mreg(17)<d> >>> 32 CALL64pcrel32

Jakob, > The intention was to identify code that may have been converted from > the old style a little too quickly. I wanted to avoid bugs from a > global s/setIsInsideBundle/bundleWithPred/g search and replace. This is a good intent. Maybe a bit temporal but sound nevertheless. > finalizeBundle is calling 'MIBundleBuilder Bundle(MBB, FirstMI, > LastMI)' which ought to

My home e--mail is down, which is where I get my llvm feeds, so please copy any replies to this address as well as the list. The call instruction can define implicit defs. What are the semantics when the call includes a use with a kill of some register and also an implicit def of that register? Is the register to be considered live out at that point? I've found a failing testcase where

On Feb 4, 2013, at 8:59 AM, "Sergei Larin" <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Jakob, > >> The intention was to identify code that may have been converted from >> the old style a little too quickly. I wanted to avoid bugs from a >> global s/setIsInsideBundle/bundleWithPred/g search and replace. > > This is a good intent. Maybe a bit temporal but

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Nikodemus Siivola < nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote: > Uh. Turns out that if I hide the pointer to @foo from LLVM by passing it > through an opaque identity function ... then everything works fine. > > Is this a bug in LLVM or is there some magic involving globals I'm > misunderstanding? > This looks like a bug in the handling of