search for: imp's

...BasicBlock&, llvm::VirtRegMap&): Assertion `KillRegs[0] == Dst' failed. when attempting to allocate this machine function: entry: 4 %reg1024<def,dead> = MOV32rr %EDI<kill> 12 %reg1025<def,dead> = MOV64rr %RSI<kill> 20 ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, %ESP<imp-def>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>, %ESP<imp-use> 28 %reg1026<def> = MOV8ri 4 36 %reg1027<def> = FsFLD0SD 44 %reg1028<def> = LEA64r %reg0, 1, %reg0, <ga:.str1> 52 %RDI<def> = MOV64rr %reg1028<kill> 60 %XMM0<def> = FsMOVAPDrr...

...: Assertion `KillRegs[0] == Dst' failed. > > > when attempting to allocate this machine function: > > entry: > 4 %reg1024<def,dead> = MOV32rr %EDI<kill> > 12 %reg1025<def,dead> = MOV64rr %RSI<kill> > 20 ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, %ESP<imp-def>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>, > %ESP<imp-use> > 28 %reg1026<def> = MOV8ri 4 > 36 %reg1027<def> = FsFLD0SD > 44 %reg1028<def> = LEA64r %reg0, 1, %reg0, <ga:.str1> > 52 %RDI<def> = MOV64rr %reg1028<kill> > 60...

...e(); ++i) origBB.at(i)->moveAfter(newEntry); MCInstrInfo tii = *MF.getTarget().getInstrInfo(); MachineInstr *plop = BuildMI(MF, DebugLoc(),tii.get(X86::JMP_4)).addMBB(origBB.at(1)); newEntry->push_back(plop); return false; } And here is the resulting code (it's a simple program with some 'if'): (null) BB#4 JMP_4 <BB#0> if.end BB#3 %RDI<def> = LEA64r %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@.str2>, %noreg ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64 0, %RSP<imp-def>, %EFLAGS<imp-def>, %RSP<imp-use> %AL<def> = MOV8ri 0 CALL64pcrel32 <ga:@printf>, <r...

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:11:27 +0300 Bee Air via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Good day! > Test the dynamic DNS updates > > # samba_dnsupdate --verbose > IPs: ['200.2.2.15'] > Looking for DNS entry A dcs3.BEO.IMP 200.2.2.15 as dcs3.BEO.IMP. > Looking for DNS entry CNAME > 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb-251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as > 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb- > 251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP. > Looking for DNS entry NS BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as BEO.IMP. > Looking for DNS entry NS _msdcs.B...

...39;m using the 'norm' package (based on Shafer's NORM) on some data. In outline, (X,Y) are bivariate normal, var(X)=0.29, var(Y)=24.4, cov(X,Y)=-0.277, there are some 900 cases, and some 170 values of Y have been set "missing" (NA). The puzzle is that, repeating the multiple imputation starting from the same random seed, I get different answers from the repeats depending if I do an odd number of imputations, but the same answer on the repeats if I do en even number (which includes the second repeat of an odd number). It may possibly have something to do with how I've...

Good day! Test the dynamic DNS updates # samba_dnsupdate --verbose IPs: ['200.2.2.15'] Looking for DNS entry A dcs3.BEO.IMP 200.2.2.15 as dcs3.BEO.IMP. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb-251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb- 251271d245e3._msdcs.BEO.IMP. Looking for DNS entry NS BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as BEO.IMP. Looking for DNS entry NS _msdcs.BEO.IMP dcs3.BEO.IMP as _msdcs....

For the x86-64 target, I tried compiling a simple hello world. I don't understand the live interval information. Here's the machine instructions as dumped by LiveIntervalAnalysis: ********** MACHINEINSTRS ********** file hello.c line 3 b: 0 FNSTCW16m <fi#0>, 1, %NOREG, 0 FNSTCW16m <fi#0> 1 %mreg(0) 0 4 MOV8mi <fi#0>,...

I have the closed local network with two domain controllers on MS Windows Server 2008 R2 DC - 200.2.2.1 , DC1 - ip 200.2.2. <http://2.2.2.2/>2. Local domain - BEO.IMP I installed the domain controller on debian 12 (Samba 4.19.1-Debian) DCS3 - ip 200.2.2.15 ?onnected to the domain and AD according to the article https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory Dns is BIND 9.18.19-1 /etc/samba/smb.conf # Global parameters [...

Dear List, I'm using gam in a multiple imputation framework -- specifying the knot locations, and saving the results of multiple models, each of which is fit with slightly different data (because some of it is predicted when missing). In MI, coefficients from multiple models are averaged, as are variance-covariance matrices. VCV's...

On Jun 26, 2007, at 11:20 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > > 28 %AL<dead> = MOV8rr %reg1024<kill>, %EAX<imp-def> > MOV8rr %mreg(2)<d> %reg1024 %mreg(17)<d> > 32 CALL64pcrel32 <ga:printf>, %RDI<kill>, %RAX<imp-def>, %RCX<imp- > def,dead>, > %RDX<imp-def,dead>, %RSI<imp-def,dead>, %RDI<imp-def,dead>, > %R8<imp-def,dead>, %R9<...

...12e018: %R0<def> = MOVi 20, 14, %reg0, %reg0 0xe3a00014 JIT: 0x4512e01c: STR %R0<kill>, %SP, %reg0, 4, 14, %reg0, Mem:ST(4,4) [b + 0] 0xe58d0004 JIT: 0x4512e020: %R0<def> = ADDri %SP, 4, 14, %reg0, %reg0 0xe28d0004 JIT: 0x4512e024: BL <ga:add1>, %R0<kill>, %R0<imp-def,dead>, %R1<imp-def,dead>, %R2<imp-def,dead>, %R3<imp-def,dead>, %R12<imp-def,dead>, %LR<imp-def,dead>, %D0<imp-def,dead>, %D1<imp-def,dead>, %D2<imp-def,dead>, %D3<imp-def,dead>, %D4<imp-def,dead>, %D5<imp-def,dead>, %D6<im...

Since the getelementptrs were implicitly generated by the CreateStore/Load I'm not sure how to get access to them. So I hacked the assignment to be done thrice: once using a manual decomposition into two GEPs and stores, once using the "big" CreateStore, once via the setGlobal function, printing addresses and memory...

Evan, thanks for responding so quickly. On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:11, Evan Cheng wrote: > On Jun 26, 2007, at 11:20 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > > 28 %AL<dead> = MOV8rr %reg1024<kill>, %EAX<imp-def> > > MOV8rr %mreg(2)<d> %reg1024 %mreg(17)<d> > > 32 CALL64pcrel32 <ga:printf>, %RDI<kill>, %RAX<imp-def>, %RCX<imp- > > def,dead>, > > %RDX<imp-def,dead>, %RSI<imp-def,dead>, %RDI<imp-def,dead>, > > %R8<i...

....trial"){j=1} if (varstochange[i] == "year"){j=2} if (varstochange[i] == "crop.legume"){j=3} if (varstochange[i] == "crop.fruit"){j=4} if (varstochange[i] == "feedstock"){j=5} if (varstochange[i] == "BCAR.imp"){j=8} if (varstochange[i] == "INAR.imp"){j=9} if (varstochange[i] == "bcph.imp"){j=10} if (varstochange[i] == "phi.imp"){j=11} if (varstochange[i] == "htt.imp"){j=12} if (varstochange[i] == "bc.prc.C.imp...

Instead of the jpg image l write like this: DNS Master on the DC domain controller (Windows Server 2008 R2) DNS DC Reverse Lookup Zones beo.imp _msdsc dc domains gc pdc _sites .......... In the window - _msdsc 246933f5-768e-4399-9adb-251271d245e3 (CNAME) dcs3.beo.imp ...................

On Jun 26, 2007, at 12:57 PM, David Greene wrote: > Evan, thanks for responding so quickly. > > On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:11, Evan Cheng wrote: >> On Jun 26, 2007, at 11:20 AM, David A. Greene wrote: >>> 28 %AL<dead> = MOV8rr %reg1024<kill>, %EAX<imp-def> >>> MOV8rr %mreg(2)<d> %reg1024 %mreg(17)<d> >>> 32 CALL64pcrel32 <ga:printf>, %RDI<kill>, %RAX<imp-def>, %RCX<imp- >>> def,dead>, >>> %RDX<imp-def,dead>, %RSI<imp-def,dead>, %RDI<imp-def,dead>, >&g...

...ses "^" means "isBundledWithPred()" and "v" means "isBundledWithSucc()"): I have the following (existing) bundle for which I want to regenerate the bundle header (You see that %R17 is not currently in the def list for the bundle header). v BUNDLE %P3<imp-def>, %R29<imp-use>, %D8<imp-use,kill>, %D9<imp-use,kill>, %R6<imp-use> *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 80, %D8<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack2] *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 72, %D9<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack3] *^v %P3<def> = CMPEQri %R6, 0 *^ %R17<def> = TFR_cd...

My home e--mail is down, which is where I get my llvm feeds, so please copy any replies to this address as well as the list. The call instruction can define implicit defs. What are the semantics when the call includes a use with a kill of some register and also an implicit def of that register? Is the register to be considered live out at that point? I've found a failing testcase where register scavenging complains about redefining a live register....

...ndledWithPred()" and "v" means "isBundledWithSucc()"): > > I have the following (existing) bundle for which I want to regenerate the > bundle header (You see that %R17 is not currently in the def list for the > bundle header). > > > v BUNDLE %P3<imp-def>, %R29<imp-use>, %D8<imp-use,kill>, > %D9<imp-use,kill>, %R6<imp-use> > *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 80, %D8<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack2] > *^v STrid_indexed %R29, 72, %D9<kill>; mem:ST8[FixedStack3] > *^v %P3<def> = CMPEQri %R6, 0 > *^...

...028D3E98 > datum: 0000007B > p = 02F80000 > class: 028D3E98 > datum: 0000007B > > Cheers, > > -- nikodemus > > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Nikodemus Siivola < > nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote: > >> Since the getelementptrs were implicitly generated by the >> CreateStore/Load I'm not sure how to get access to them. >> >> So I hacked the assignment to be done thrice: once using a manual >> decomposition into two GEPs and stores, once using the "big" CreateStore, >> once via the setGlo...