Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "immi32".
Did you mean:
imm32
2011 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
That's fine with me. Unless there's a particular reason for it I would
suggest perhaps changing the immediate syntax as well to swap it round,
so it would be Immi32, Immi64, Immf32, etc. It doesn't bother me that
much the way it currently is, but when there are lots of operations
taking a register and an immediate, representing them in the same way
might be a little more consistent?
Personally, I think I also might prefer an underscore to make it more...
2011 May 13
3
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
Hi,
Current register class naming has a confusing prefix letter 'R' (it is
my bad), such as the first 'R' of RRegu32 (for unsigned 32-bit
registers).
I propose a 'Reg' + type name naming convention for register classes; such as:
Regu16, Regu32, Regf32, Regf64
With one exception for predicate registers (capitalized first letter of 'pred'):
RegPred
Since
2011 May 13
2
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Dan Bailey <drb at dneg.com> wrote:
> That's fine with me. Unless there's a particular reason for it I would
> suggest perhaps changing the immediate syntax as well to swap it round, so
> it would be Immi32, Immi64, Immf32, etc. It doesn't bother me that much the
> way it currently is, but when there are lots of operations taking a register
> and an immediate, representing them in the same way might be a little more
> consistent?
>
> Personally, I think I also might prefer an unders...
2011 May 13
1
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
...olewinski wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Dan Bailey <drb at dneg.com> wrote:
>
>> That's fine with me. Unless there's a particular reason for it I would
>> suggest perhaps changing the immediate syntax as well to swap it round, so
>> it would be Immi32, Immi64, Immf32, etc. It doesn't bother me that much the
>> way it currently is, but when there are lots of operations taking a register
>> and an immediate, representing them in the same way might be a little more
>> consistent?
>>
>> Personally, I think I also mi...
2011 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
...quot;gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">That's
fine with me. Unless there's a particular reason for it I would suggest
perhaps changing the immediate syntax as well to swap it round, so it
would be Immi32, Immi64, Immf32, etc. It doesn't bother me that much
the way it currently is, but when there are lots of operations taking a
register and an immediate, representing them in the same way might be a
little more consistent?<br>
<br>
Personally, I think I also might prefer an unders...