Displaying 20 results from an estimated 154 matches for "immaturely".
Did you mean:
immature
2015 Apr 03
4
Dovecot Oy merger with Open-Xchange AG
On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:42:42 -0400, Charles Marcus stated:
>People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in
>this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without.
>
>If you feel compelled to 'call him out', then by all means do so, but do
>it PRIVATELY.
It is not just Reindl. People like Nick who feel compelled to continue this
persiflage
2016 May 06
6
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
On 05/06/2016 09:02 AM, Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev wrote:
>>> Say what you want about the Linux kernel community, but you can't
>>> call
>>> it immature. You can call the behaviour of some of its people
>>> immature, but the community itself is not by a long shot.
>> But there are reasonable people who will not interact with that community because
2008 Oct 31
1
[LLVMdev] 2.4 Pre-release (v2)
"Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> writes:
Tanya,
There is no reason to include the CMake build system on this release. It
is undocumented and immature.
Please remove the cmake/ directory and all files named CMakeLists.txt
from the LLVM source tree.
--
Oscar
2008 Oct 29
3
OT - Please don't feed the Troll(s)
Folks,
I fully understand the emotional need to respond to one who throws
around terms like "Communist", "Tyrannical", etc. even if ostensibly
framed as a rhetorical question. Certain terms and phrases are by nature
pejorative and I;m sure the OP knew this when he entered his post.
My feeling was the OP is either an ignorant, unappreciative,
self-centered, and emotionally
2016 May 05
3
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Renato Golin via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> To: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com>
> Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 2:06:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
>
> On 5
2003 Feb 20
2
Samba-LDAP too imature for production?
2.2.7a
It seems that samba-ldap is still to immature for any kind of production
environment. The provided Perl scripts simply do not work with the 'add
user script' setting or if they do, then there is an an undocumented
bug, issue, etc. The scripts work fine from the command line but
aparently samba won't execute them properly. Since I cannot expect my
users to understand
2017 Nov 21
2
mystery "158"
This is a simple problem, but a mystery to me.
I'm trying to grab $Family "Scelionidae" from one dataframe and put it into
another dataframe occupied with NA in $Family. The result is a "158" ends
up there instead of Scelionidae.
Simply put fam$Family[1] <- least$Family[1]
If I have made a mistake here, can somebody point it out. I've included
the simple
2008 Oct 31
0
[LLVMdev] 2.4 Pre-release (v2)
On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> "Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> writes:
>
> Tanya,
>
> There is no reason to include the CMake build system on this
> release. It
> is undocumented and immature.
>
> Please remove the cmake/ directory and all files named CMakeLists.txt
> from the LLVM source tree.
If there is no harm of
2008 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] 2.4 Pre-release (v2)
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>> There is no reason to include the CMake build system on this
>> release. It
>> is undocumented and immature.
>>
>> Please remove the cmake/ directory and all files named CMakeLists.txt
>> from the LLVM source tree.
2011 May 15
0
[LLVMdev] Fail when building llvm2.9 using MinGW64
Chen,
2011/5/13 陈晓宇 <xychen0921 at gmail.com>:
> ../llvm2.9/configure --prefix=/home/AutoESL/llvm-obj
> --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32
> --disable-multilib
Please try with "--build=x86_64-w64-mingw32", not "--host".
If you would still have any troubles, make sure your
x86_64-w64-g++.exe can generate correct
2015 Apr 03
0
Dovecot Oy merger with Open-Xchange AG
On 03/04/15 16:09, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:42:42 -0400, Charles Marcus stated:
>
>> People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in
>> this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without.
>>
>> If you feel compelled to 'call him out', then by all means do so, but do
>> it PRIVATELY.
> It is not just
2014 Nov 08
0
RFC: new variable battery.status
On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at mittelstaedt.us> wrote:
> Now I suppose your going to respond with that immature drivel that's been floating around, lets see if I remember it:
>
>> Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> > Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>> >> Top-posting.
>>
2016 May 05
3
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:42 AM C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:55 AM C Bergström <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Chandler - I do not want to derail, hijack or change the topic of this
> >>
2017 Nov 21
0
mystery "158"
Your data frame fam contains factors. Turn it into character strings using
fam$Family = as.character(fam$Family)
and try again. It may be helpful if you read up on R's factors, see ?factor.
HTH,
Peter
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Glen Forister <gforister at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a simple problem, but a mystery to me.
> I'm trying to grab $Family
2005 Dec 19
1
Submiting list - preserving order
Hi,
I ma new to the scriptaculus and I do like the concept.
The effects are quite useful; however some of the drag and
drop functionality seems still quite immature.
Since I am new to the JavaScript altogether I have
more questions then knowledge here some of them:
1. In a situation where I am interested in submitting
the order of sorted container, what is the best way to
keep track of the
2007 May 02
3
ED50 from logistic model with interactions
Hi,
I was wondering if someone could please help me. I am doing a logistic
regression to compare size at maturity between 3 seasons. My model is:
fit <- glm(Mature ~ Season * Size - 1, family = binomial, data=dat)
where Mature is a binary response, 0 for immature, 1 for mature. There
are 3 Seasons.
The Season * Size interaction is significant. I would like to compare the
size at 50%
2011 May 13
4
[LLVMdev] Fail when building llvm2.9 using MinGW64
I was building llvm2.9 using MinGW64 on windows, msys was 32 bit so I
specified --host option for a cross compiling. Following are my configure
options:
../llvm2.9/configure --prefix=/home/AutoESL/llvm-obj
--host=x86_64-w64-mingw32
--disable-multilib
The error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/AutoESL/llvm-obj/lib/VMCore'
make[1]: ***
2007 Apr 28
5
Any plans for storing messages on a database?
Redudancy and recovering from a mailstore failure is one of the concerns I
am trying to address where I work.
Any plans to have Dovecot store emails in a database?
NAS/SAN devices which do automatic replication to a second device are
extremely expensive.
I also don't see any distributed filesystem which is mature and available
for the OS we use (FreeBSD).
I recall at one point, many
2012 Apr 12
3
[LLVMdev] clang++ on MacOSX with fsf-gcc libstdc++?
Hi,
the subject says it all...
After some experimenting, I got a bit confused as far as what the proper thing to do might be....
I build llvm/clang from trunk sources on OSX Lion 10.7.3 (i.e. x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0 to speak GNU's platform-ese) where I also have successfully built a fsf-gcc 4.6.2 (and lately a 4.7 for that matter) from sources.
Now, I think I understand that by playing
2007 Dec 15
17
Upgrade to Asterisk 1.4 - it's one year's old!
Friends in the Asterisk community,
I'm kind of interested in the slow uptake of Asterisk 1.4. Between 1.2
and 1.4 there's been a lot of
important development. New code cleanups, optimization, new functions.
I realize that 1.4 at release time wasn't ready for release, but we've
spent one year polishing it,
working hard with bug fixes. The 1.4 that is in distribution now is