search for: imm_f32

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "imm_f32".

Did you mean: imm32
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
2011 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
...much the way it currently is, but when there are lots of operations taking a register and an immediate, representing them in the same way might be a little more consistent? Personally, I think I also might prefer an underscore to make it more readable for new users (Reg_u32, Reg_pred, Imm_i32, Imm_f32, etc). That's maybe just my own preference, so feel free to do it as you've suggested! Dan Che-Liang Chiou wrote: > Hi, > > Current register class naming has a confusing prefix letter 'R' (it is > my bad), such as the first 'R' of RRegu32 (for unsigned 32-bit...
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
2011 May 13
3
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
Hi, Current register class naming has a confusing prefix letter 'R' (it is my bad), such as the first 'R' of RRegu32 (for unsigned 32-bit registers). I propose a 'Reg' + type name naming convention for register classes; such as: Regu16, Regu32, Regf32, Regf64 With one exception for predicate registers (capitalized first letter of 'pred'): RegPred Since
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
2011 May 13
2
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
...ently is, but when there are lots of operations taking a register > and an immediate, representing them in the same way might be a little more > consistent? > > Personally, I think I also might prefer an underscore to make it more > readable for new users (Reg_u32, Reg_pred, Imm_i32, Imm_f32, etc). That's > maybe just my own preference, so feel free to do it as you've suggested! > > Dan I've been considering the way registers are represented in the PTX back-end quite a bit lately, and I think we need to re-consider the way we handle registers in the PTX back-end....
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
2011 May 13
1
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
...here are lots of operations taking a register >> and an immediate, representing them in the same way might be a little more >> consistent? >> >> Personally, I think I also might prefer an underscore to make it more >> readable for new users (Reg_u32, Reg_pred, Imm_i32, Imm_f32, etc). That's >> maybe just my own preference, so feel free to do it as you've suggested! >> >> Dan > > > I've been considering the way registers are represented in the PTX > back-end quite a bit lately, and I think we need to re-consider the way we > h...
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
2011 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] [ptx] Propose a register class naming convention change
...ently is, but when there are lots of operations taking a register and an immediate, representing them in the same way might be a little more consistent?<br> <br> Personally, I think I also might prefer an underscore to make it more readable for new users (Reg_u32, Reg_pred, Imm_i32, Imm_f32, etc). That's maybe just my own preference, so feel free to do it as you've suggested!<br> <font color="#888888"> <br> Dan</font></blockquote> <div><br> </div> <div>I've been considering the way registers are...