search for: imclud

...eems to be good accuracy on what looks like the broken one. The values there are: 2.4703282293e-324 gives 4.940656e-324 2.4703282292e-324 gives 0 My first thought was that GMP and/or MPFR weren't working properly, so I recompiled GMP, which passed all of its tests, and GCC, making sure to imclude support for them. This made no difference. Anyone have any ideas, including which one is broken? Both? -Bitt

...eems to be good accuracy on what looks like the broken one. The values there are: 2.4703282293e-324 gives 4.940656e-324 2.4703282292e-324 gives 0 My first thought was that GMP and/or MPFR weren't working properly, so I recompiled GMP, which passed all of its tests, and GCC, making sure to imclude support for them. This made no difference. Anyone have any ideas, including which one is broken? Both? -Bitt

Hello, Anyone on this group using / implementing * and hardware certified for use in Europe ? I believe that ISDN4Linux cards mostly have telecomm certificates, so using them should be safe on the client side. Are there any major issues / problems associated with using such cards with * ? I am talking about a small / very small office with single - few lines. All the best, Piotr Adamiak --

Hello mailing list! I have been working with XCP a little bit, and I have the impression that this distro is insecure. First, it does not look like update repositories are enabled inside /etc/yum.repos.d, although I''m from an apt background so I may be misinterpreting that. Where will my security updates come from? Next, it appears that the root password hash is directly stored inside

Hi, I was wondering if there have been any conversations with backup vendors like Veritas or EMC regarding better integration with ZFS. While I understand they can use the "native" mode of reading files from the filesystem, it would be great if there were agents that had options like making a snapshot and storing a "zfs backup" datastream that could be used for zfs restore.