search for: imap_parser_destroy

....2463 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 safe_memset 7710 100.000 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 safe_memset [self] ------- 1 0.0148 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 i_stream_limit_read 2 0.0296 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 i_stream_header_filt(..) 6 0.0888 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 imap_parser_destroy 8 0.1184 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 settings_parser_deinit 230 3.4039 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 imap_parser_reset 6510 96.3445 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 pool_alloconly_unref 598 0.2518 libdovecot.so.0.0.0 pool_alloconly_clear 7339 89.8286 libdovecot.so....

I have Dovecot 0.99.9.1 compiled from the source, without SSL, running on a Red Hat 9.0 system - EXT3 file system, Pentium Pro 233 MHz, Intel motherboard, 128M RAM, IBM 40Gig 7200 RPM HD. I find reading and searching to be nice and fast, and comparing it with Courier IMAP on a Celeron 824 MHz, I think Dovecot is generally not much slower, which means it may well be faster than Courier in some or

...x->fetch_ctx->failed) { + if (error == NULL && !toobig) + error = "message fetch failed"; + } + cfctx->fetch_ctx->urlfetch = FALSE; + } + if (cfctx->search_args != NULL) + mail_search_args_unref(&cfctx->search_args); + if (cfctx->parser != NULL) + imap_parser_destroy(&cfctx->parser); + if (cfctx->input != NULL) + i_stream_unref(&cfctx->input); + if (cfctx->box != NULL) + mailbox_close(&cfctx->box); + if (cfctx->client_output != NULL) + cfctx->ctx->client->output = cfctx->client_output; + cfctx->ctx->client->...