Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "ilist_nod".
Did you mean:
ilist_node
2014 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] bug in ilist_node::getPrevNode() ?
Hi all,
I stumbled over a problem in ilist_node::getPrevNode(). It crashes when invoked for the first element in a list.
It's because the Prev pointer of a first list element does not point to the sentinel but is just null.
First question: Is this really a bug or am I doing something wrong?
Second question: If it is a bug, what should be...
2012 Jul 20
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Kaleidoscope Chapter 7 Compilation Error in MinGW32(MSYS Shell) on Windows
...ed this on Windows XP, Windows 7, and Windows 8 (Release Preview),
always the same messages.
Error message:
$ clang++ -g -O3 toy.cpp `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core jit
nati
ve` -o toy
c:/llvm/llvminstall/lib/libLLVMCore.a(Instructions.cpp.obj): duplicate
section `
.rdata$_ZTSN4llvm10ilist_nodeINS_11InstructionEEE[typeinfo name for
llvm::ilist_
node<llvm::Instruction>]' has different size
c:/llvm/llvminstall/lib/libLLVMCore.a(Instructions.cpp.obj): duplicate
section `
.rdata$_ZTIN4llvm10ilist_nodeINS_11InstructionEEE[typeinfo for
llvm::ilist_node<
llvm::Instruction>]'...
2016 Jul 11
2
[PATCH] D22161: SystemZ: Avoid implicit iterator conversions, NFC
...ent to the end iterator and downcast to "T*" (badness).
- MachineInstrBundleIterator::operator MachineInstr*() relies on the member of ilist_iterator<MachineInstr> being an already-downcast MachineInstr*, indirectly relying on the UB in operator++. I can't safely refactor ilist/ilist_node/etc. until code stops (indirectly) relying on this UB.
What's `&*I` all about?
- An iterator<T> does not necessarily point at a valid T.
- It could just be a sentinel object that T inherits from (in the case of lists), or an unallocated memory location (in the case of arrays).
- If...
2009 Jul 31
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: MachineInstr Annotations
...e issues with register allocators
(our primary use for these kinds of comments).
In order to get this information to the AsmPrinter without requring
a lot of overhead, I'd like to propose adding a small bitvector to
MachineInstr to hold flags. Something like this:
class MachineInstr : public ilist_node<MachineInstr> {
const TargetInstrDesc *TID; // Instruction descriptor.
unsigned short NumImplicitOps; // Number of implicit operands (which
// are determined at construction
time).
unsigned short Flags; // ***NE...
2011 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] ilist::getPrevNode asserts on list head
Hi all,
I am finding a SEGFAULT in one of my passes when using getPrevNode on an
instruction that is the only one in a BasicBlock. I was expecting
getPrevNode to return 0 in that case (as per docs), but it breaks.
I guess the code in in ilist_node.h:
NodeTy *getPrevNode() {
NodeTy *Prev = this->getPrev();
// Check for sentinel.
if (!Prev->getNext())
return 0;
return Prev;
}
would need to check if Prev is NULL before calling Prev->getNext().
BR
Carlos
2012 Dec 20
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM segmentation fault / need use Instruction instead of Instruction*
I may be mistaken as I just took a quick look, but in ilist_node the
function "getPrevNode()" actually calls a method on the previous node:
NodeTy *getPrevNode() {
NodeTy *Prev = this->getPrev();
// Check for sentinel.
if (!Prev->getNext())
return 0;
return Prev;
}
http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ilist__node_8h_source.html#l000...
2012 Dec 20
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM segmentation fault / need use Instruction instead of Instruction*
Hello John,
I was following your procedures and I isolated the problem. The problem are
represented by the basic blocks with only one element.
for (Function::iterator II = F.begin(), EE = F.end(); II != EE; ++II, ++ii)
{
BasicBlock* BB=II;
if (BB->getTerminator())
{
Instruction* current = BB->getTerminator();
Instruction* previous;
2009 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: MachineInstr Annotations
...> (our primary use for these kinds of comments).
>
> In order to get this information to the AsmPrinter without requring
> a lot of overhead, I'd like to propose adding a small bitvector to
> MachineInstr to hold flags. Something like this:
>
> class MachineInstr : public ilist_node<MachineInstr> {
> const TargetInstrDesc *TID; // Instruction descriptor.
> unsigned short NumImplicitOps; // Number of implicit
> operands (which
> // are determined at
> construction
> time).
>
> unsigned...
2008 Aug 06
2
[LLVMdev] crash in JIT when running the inliner
..._dataplus = {<std::allocator<char>> =
{<__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<char>> = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>},
_M_p = 0xb746c670 "TÉ,·\"É,·\222''·\204ò'·Ìâ+·"}}},
<llvm::Annotable> = {AnnotationList = 0x2b},
<llvm::ilist_node<llvm::Function>> = {Prev = 0x930e810,
Next = 0x9fe0a80},
BasicBlocks = {<llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::BasicBlock>> =
{<llvm::SymbolTableListTraits<llvm::BasicBlock,llvm::Function>> =
{<llvm::ilist_default_traits<llvm::BasicBlock>> =
{<llvm::ilis...
2019 May 25
3
llvm pass
Hi list,
I have several questions about LLVM pass.
1) Is building a custom LLVM pass out-of-source not recommended?
The official document only contains instructions about in-source build (http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html <http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html>).
2) opt (ver >= 4) with custom pass libraries does not work as before. When I have a simple custom LLVM pass
2014 Apr 15
10
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Seh exceptions on Win64
Hi,
I'd like to submit a patch to match the clang patch on the front end.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140414/103257.html
The front end doesn't need this patch to work but it's still important.
This is mostly based on work done by kai from redstar.de
Could I get some feedback on this?
I'm not sure if the emitting of the register names will effect
2010 Oct 01
2
[LLVMdev] CMake "sudo make install" & headers
...ling: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm/ADT/UniqueVector.h
-- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm/ADT/ValueMap.h
-- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm/ADT/VectorExtras.h
-- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h
-- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm/ADT/ilist_node.h
-- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm/AbstractTypeUser.h
-- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm/Analysis
-- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h
-- Installing: /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.h
-- Installing: /usr/loca...
2010 Oct 01
0
[LLVMdev] CMake "sudo make install" & headers
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Samuel Williams
<space.ship.traveller at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I might just be doing something stupid, but when I do
>
> $ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/llvm-2.8 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ..
> $ sudo make install
>
> I don't get the expected headers in
> /usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm
>
> It is
2010 Sep 30
6
[LLVMdev] CMake "sudo make install" & headers
Hi,
I might just be doing something stupid, but when I do
$ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/llvm-2.8 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ..
$ sudo make install
I don't get the expected headers in
/usr/local/llvm-2.8/include/llvm
It is simply an empty directory.
What am I doing wrong? This is on Mac OS X, CMake 2.8+
Kind regards,
Samuel