Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "iiuyc".
Did you mean:
iiuc
2017 Aug 04
4
[RFC][InlineCost] Modeling JumpThreading (or similar) in inline cost model
...each
> condition, give me the set of possibly affected variables" (so you can
> see if they may simplify), we could do that very very quickly (as fast
> as we can sort a vector). But it does require dominators.
For my particular problem, I think PredicateInfo would be sufficient
IIUYC. But as you suggest, I'm thinking people aren't going to be fond
of using the full dominators.
Lots of great feedback. Thanks, Danny.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at codeaurora.org
> <mailto:mcrosier at codeaurora.org>> wrote...
2011 Apr 18
0
[LLVMdev] Registering a custom opt pass as a default one
On Apr 18, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we're working on compile-time instrumentation for ThreadSanitizer (a
> data race detector, see http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test and
> http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test/wiki/CompileTimeInstrumentation),
> which is implemented as an opt plugin that is ran for each client
> C/C++ module we
2011 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] Registering a custom opt pass as a default one
Hi all,
we're working on compile-time instrumentation for ThreadSanitizer (a
data race detector, see http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test and
http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test/wiki/CompileTimeInstrumentation),
which is implemented as an opt plugin that is ran for each client
C/C++ module we compile.
To build a binary consisting of several modules the following steps
are performed:
2017 Aug 07
3
[RFC][InlineCost] Modeling JumpThreading (or similar) in inline cost model
...about is "for each condition, give me the set of possibly affected variables" (so you can see if they may simplify), we could do that very very quickly (as fast as we can sort a vector). But it does require dominators.
For my particular problem, I think PredicateInfo would be sufficient IIUYC. But as you suggest, I'm thinking people aren't going to be fond of using the full dominators.
Lots of great feedback. Thanks, Danny.
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at codeaurora.org<mailto:mcrosier at codeaurora.org>> wrote:
All,
I'm workin...
2017 Aug 07
2
[RFC][InlineCost] Modeling JumpThreading (or similar) in inline cost model
...variables" (so you can see if they may simplify), we could
> do that very very quickly (as fast as we can sort a
> vector). But it does require dominators.
>
>
> For my particular problem, I think PredicateInfo would be
> sufficient IIUYC. But as you suggest, I'm thinking people
> aren't going to be fond of using the full dominators.
>
> Lots of great feedback. Thanks, Danny.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Chad Rosier
> <mcrosier at codeaurora...
2017 Aug 04
3
[RFC][InlineCost] Modeling JumpThreading (or similar) in inline cost model
All,
I'm working on an improvement to the inline cost model, but I'm unsure
how to proceed. Let me begin by first describing the problem I'm trying
to solve. Consider the following pseudo C code:
*typedef struct element {
unsigned idx;
} element_t;
*
*static inline
unsigned char fn2 (element_t *dst_ptr, const element_t *a_ptr,
const element_t *b_ptr,