search for: ihmo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, someone are using Dell 2900 and PERC5 controller with Xen? I want to test this server with 24GB RAM, 7 discs 15000 RPM SCSI and 2 processors. If someone could tell me if this hardware works great with Xen, will be nice. Thanks. Lucas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

...it. Good to know that, but I think it can only work when the packet is not modified by XDP? > There > are a lot of unanswered questions on how this will be implemented. > Thus, I cannot layout how we are going to leverage this info yet, but > your patch are killing this info, which IHMO is going in the wrong > direction. I can copy vnet header ahead of data_hard_start, does it work for you? Thanks > > >> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/v...

...it. Good to know that, but I think it can only work when the packet is not modified by XDP? > There > are a lot of unanswered questions on how this will be implemented. > Thus, I cannot layout how we are going to leverage this info yet, but > your patch are killing this info, which IHMO is going in the wrong > direction. I can copy vnet header ahead of data_hard_start, does it work for you? Thanks > > >> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/v...

Hi, all the descriptions of networking setups with VMs I`m seeing involve bridges. The only use I see for bridges is when I actually want to be able to send network traffic to multiple arbitrary interfaces connected to the bridge. I do neither need, nor want bridges when I want to keep the VMs separated, like when separating a VM in a DMZ from a VM in the LAN. The bridge acts like a hub.

...), c(0,9,8,Inf)) > > > # returns the same result (Inf is left as value with highest rank): > > wilcox.test(c(1,2,3,4), c(0,9,8,7), paired=TRUE) > > wilcox.test(c(1,2,3,4), c(0,9,8,Inf), paired=TRUE) > >Now which of the two cases do you consider correct ? > >IHMO, the 2nd one is correct: it is exactly one property of the >*robustness* of the wilcoxon test and very desirable that any >(positive) outlier is treated the same as just "the largest >value" and the test statistic (and hence the p-value) should not >change. > >So I think...

On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:27:26 -0700 David Ahern <dsahern at gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/31/19 1:15 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > >> > >> David, Jesper, care to chime in where we ended up in that last thread > >> discussion this? > > > > IHMO packets RX and TX on a device need to be accounted, in standard > > counters, regardless of XDP. For XDP RX the packet is counted as RX, > > regardless if XDP choose to XDP_DROP. On XDP TX which is via > > XDP_REDIRECT or XDP_TX, the driver that transmit the packet need to >...

Hi, I was trying to crosscompile dovecot, but I got some error: --with-notify=inotify don't work, as it try to run a test program to verify if inotify is supported in the building platform. Solved with --with-notify=dnotify. Ihmo, is more a hack than a solution. | checking whether posix_fallocate() works... configure: error: cannot run test program while cross compiling I can't find an a suitable option for this error. Again the problem is that configure can't run an executable for a different platform. It's...

Hi! When using multiple identities on one physical phone (Snom 320), I get check_auth: username mismatch, have <7705>, digest has <7736> messages when placing a call from a different account than the first one. From reading the asterisk source, I can see that the problem is that peer authentication is not matched against username, but against ip/port. I need to have multiple

Hi People, As part of securing SSH we currently have UseDNS set to yes. But we are finding that a number of ISP's are deliberately refusing to configure matching forward and reverse DNS records. So I am wondering how many of you are still using this option?

...trying to get a program called Hamster to work under Wine. > Hamster is a local NNTP/POP3/SMTP server that fetches messages from > multiple sources and combines them into a single local database > that any mail/news client can then access. > How about leafnode/$mailserver/$popserver. IHMO it is braindead to try to substitute some good UNIX-programs by an windows-emulation and a windows-program. H. -- Q: How many mutt users does it take to change a lightbulb? A: One. But you have to set the option auto-change-illumination in your .muttrc file. Dresdener LaTeX-Stammtisch: http...

hi, I would like to change the old windows 2000 domain structure into one samba 3 domain. the migration is to take place gradually for the departments. I had imagined to packing the samba pdc with another domain name into the same subnetz as windows pdc. Windows 2k DN = work.wurst.local Samba 3 DN = work.wurst.de IP Subnet = 192.168.2.0/24 (Samba and Windows) is it possible ? thank stefan --

Hello Timo, I'm having a problem with mbox that opening folder is slow when new mails are delivered to a folder. I'm delivering through the deliver program. Deliver updates index files but IHMO not completely correct. Therefore I compared index files before and after: 1.) Just delivered 2.) After accessing through imap via Thunderbird diff looks like (stripped down to the relevant things): INDEX: -first recent uid ......... = 25847 +first recent uid ......... = 25848 -log file tail offs...

How similar should my rpm build machine be to my target deploy machines? Like, do you have to build on a multi-core machine if you plan to run on a multi-core machine? Or as long as the arch is the same, nothing else matters? johnn

...rmation (see pahole below sign). It is currently not used in the XDP case, but we will be working towards using it. There are a lot of unanswered questions on how this will be implemented. Thus, I cannot layout how we are going to leverage this info yet, but your patch are killing this info, which IHMO is going in the wrong direction. > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/...

...>>> to do their own counting... >> >> This has been definitely a discussion point, and something we should >> develop a clear, strong, policy on. >> >> David, Jesper, care to chime in where we ended up in that last thread >> discussion this? > > IHMO packets RX and TX on a device need to be accounted, in standard > counters, regardless of XDP. For XDP RX the packet is counted as RX, > regardless if XDP choose to XDP_DROP. On XDP TX which is via > XDP_REDIRECT or XDP_TX, the driver that transmit the packet need to > account the pac...

...nk it can only work when the packet is not > modified by XDP? > > > > There > > are a lot of unanswered questions on how this will be implemented. > > Thus, I cannot layout how we are going to leverage this info yet, but > > your patch are killing this info, which IHMO is going in the wrong > > direction. > > > I can copy vnet header ahead of data_hard_start, does it work for you? > > Thanks That's likely to be somewhat expensive. > > > > > > > > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com> >...

...) > wilcox.test(c(1,2,3,4), c(0,9,8,Inf)) > # returns the same result (Inf is left as value with highest rank): > wilcox.test(c(1,2,3,4), c(0,9,8,7), paired=TRUE) > wilcox.test(c(1,2,3,4), c(0,9,8,Inf), paired=TRUE) Now which of the two cases do you consider correct ? IHMO, the 2nd one is correct: it is exactly one property of the *robustness* of the wilcoxon test and very desirable that any (positive) outlier is treated the same as just "the largest value" and the test statistic (and hence the p-value) should not change. So I think the first case is wrong...

We tried to reserve space for vnet header before xdp.data_hard_start. But this is useless since the packet could be modified by XDP which may invalidate the information stored in the header and there's no way for XDP to know the existence of the vnet header currently. So let's just not reserve space for vnet header in this case. Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com>

We tried to reserve space for vnet header before xdp.data_hard_start. But this is useless since the packet could be modified by XDP which may invalidate the information stored in the header and there's no way for XDP to know the existence of the vnet header currently. So let's just not reserve space for vnet header in this case. Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer at redhat.com>

...hern <dsahern at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/31/19 1:15 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> David, Jesper, care to chime in where we ended up in that last thread >>>>> discussion this? >>>> >>>> IHMO packets RX and TX on a device need to be accounted, in standard >>>> counters, regardless of XDP. For XDP RX the packet is counted as RX, >>>> regardless if XDP choose to XDP_DROP. On XDP TX which is via >>>> XDP_REDIRECT or XDP_TX, the driver that transmit the...