Displaying 20 results from an estimated 58 matches for "iha".
Did you mean:
ida
2008 Jul 03
0
[PATCH] ia64/pv_ops: paravirtualized istruction checker.
...sed instead of cpp.
+ */
+
+/* for .S
+ * itc.i
+ * itc.d
+ *
+ * bsw.0
+ * bsw.1
+ *
+ * ssm psr.ic | PSR_DEFAULT_BITS
+ * ssm psr.ic
+ * rsm psr.ic
+ * ssm psr.i
+ * rsm psr.i
+ * rsm psr.i | psr.ic
+ * rsm psr.dt
+ * ssm psr.dt
+ *
+ * mov = cr.ifa
+ * mov = cr.itir
+ * mov = cr.isr
+ * mov = cr.iha
+ * mov = cr.ipsr
+ * mov = cr.iim
+ * mov = cr.iip
+ * mov = cr.ivr
+ * mov = psr
+ *
+ * mov cr.ifa =
+ * mov cr.itir =
+ * mov cr.iha =
+ * mov cr.ipsr =
+ * mov cr.ifs =
+ * mov cr.iip =
+ * mov cr.kr =
+ */
+
+/* for intrinsics
+ * ssm psr.i
+ * rsm psr.i
+ * mov = psr
+ * mov = ivr
+ * mov =...
2008 Jul 03
0
[PATCH] ia64/pv_ops: paravirtualized istruction checker.
...sed instead of cpp.
+ */
+
+/* for .S
+ * itc.i
+ * itc.d
+ *
+ * bsw.0
+ * bsw.1
+ *
+ * ssm psr.ic | PSR_DEFAULT_BITS
+ * ssm psr.ic
+ * rsm psr.ic
+ * ssm psr.i
+ * rsm psr.i
+ * rsm psr.i | psr.ic
+ * rsm psr.dt
+ * ssm psr.dt
+ *
+ * mov = cr.ifa
+ * mov = cr.itir
+ * mov = cr.isr
+ * mov = cr.iha
+ * mov = cr.ipsr
+ * mov = cr.iim
+ * mov = cr.iip
+ * mov = cr.ivr
+ * mov = psr
+ *
+ * mov cr.ifa =
+ * mov cr.itir =
+ * mov cr.iha =
+ * mov cr.ipsr =
+ * mov cr.ifs =
+ * mov cr.iip =
+ * mov cr.kr =
+ */
+
+/* for intrinsics
+ * ssm psr.i
+ * rsm psr.i
+ * mov = psr
+ * mov = ivr
+ * mov =...
2008 May 15
1
Bug#471936: setting package to logcheck-database logtail logcheck, tagging 473619, tagging 478334, tagging 472368 ...
...# - deal with socket connections by e.g. evolution (closes: #448510, #473619).
# * ignore.d.workstation/kernel
# - also ignore loading of R300 microcode (closes: #474606).
# * ignore.d.server/spamd
# - fix spamd processing message pattern when msgid is unknown; thanks to
# Michal ??iha?? for the patch (closes: #471936).
# * ignore.d.server/dkim-filter
# - ignore warnings about bad signature data; thanks to Clint Adams
# (closes: #478334).
# * If nail is not installed and MAILASATTACH is set, fall back to regular
# method (closes: #479278).
#
package logcheck-databas...
2008 Dec 12
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 2
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just
enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86
paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops.
The binary patch optimization is important on native case because
the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect
2008 Dec 12
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 2
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just
enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86
paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops.
The binary patch optimization is important on native case because
the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect
2008 Dec 22
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 3
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just
enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86
paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which
depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen:
more paravirtualization.
The binary patch optimization is important on
2008 Dec 22
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 3
This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just
enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86
paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which
depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen:
more paravirtualization.
The binary patch optimization is important on
2009 Mar 04
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 4
This patch set is for the next merge window.
They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting
from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which
depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen:
more paravirtualization.
The binary patch optimization is important on native
2009 Mar 04
5
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization TAKE 4
This patch set is for the next merge window.
They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting
from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge.
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which
depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen:
more paravirtualization.
The binary patch optimization is important on native
2008 Nov 25
6
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops.
The binary patch optimization is important on native case because
the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect
call into in-place execution or direct call.
The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting
things.
The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a
2008 Nov 25
6
[PATCH 0/5] ia64/pv_ops, xen: binary patch optimization
This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops.
The binary patch optimization is important on native case because
the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect
call into in-place execution or direct call.
The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting
things.
The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a
2008 Apr 09
15
[PATCH 00/15] RFC: ia64/pv_ops take 4
Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the
framework for virtualization support.
Please review and comments.
On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and
eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too.
Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on
ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation
2008 Apr 09
15
[PATCH 00/15] RFC: ia64/pv_ops take 4
Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the
framework for virtualization support.
Please review and comments.
On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and
eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too.
Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on
ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation
2008 May 19
18
[PATCH 00/17] ia64/pv_ops take 6
Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the
framework for virtualization support.
Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3,
bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support.
I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository.
On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and
eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops
2008 May 19
18
[PATCH 00/17] ia64/pv_ops take 6
Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the
framework for virtualization support.
Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3,
bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support.
I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository.
On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and
eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops
2008 Mar 31
1
[05/17][PATCH] kvm/ia64 : Add head files for kvm/ia64
Hi Xiantao,
More comments.
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>From 696b9eea9f5001a7b7a07c0e58514aa10306b91a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:51:36 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add head files for kvm/ia64
>
> ia64_regs: some defintions for special registers
> which aren't defined in
2008 Mar 31
1
[05/17][PATCH] kvm/ia64 : Add head files for kvm/ia64
Hi Xiantao,
More comments.
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>From 696b9eea9f5001a7b7a07c0e58514aa10306b91a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:51:36 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add head files for kvm/ia64
>
> ia64_regs: some defintions for special registers
> which aren't defined in
2006 Nov 21
5
Why Aastra uses 48V whereas other IP Phones use much less, i.e. 5-12V
Hi,
Why Aastra phones use more electricity, i.e. 48VDC whereas other phones use
much less, e.g. Grandstream and Linksys both use only 5VDC. I first thought
it was because of PoE, but the ones with 5VDC also run fine on PoE. What is
the difference in power consumption then?
--
Zeeshan A Zakaria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2008 Apr 30
16
[PATCH 00/15] ia64/pv_ops take 5
Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the
framework for virtualization support.
Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions.
On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and
eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too.
Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on
ia64/pv_ops.
2008 Apr 30
16
[PATCH 00/15] ia64/pv_ops take 5
Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the
framework for virtualization support.
Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions.
On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and
eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too.
Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on
ia64/pv_ops.