Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "igvt".
Did you mean:
gvt
2019 Apr 18
2
GVT-g - suboptimal user experience
Hi.
In the current state of gvt-g the user experience is suboptimal.
So my question is what are the ETAs for following features:
1. Accelerated virt-manager console using gvt-g device
2. Custom resolutions or dynamic resolution
3. UEFI VMs support (Windows guest)
Thanks.
2019 Apr 20
0
Re: [iGVT-g] GVT-g - suboptimal user experience
Could you elaborate a bit more about the first two features? On UEFI VMs support (Windows guest), do you mean enabling Windows VM display on UEFI? Thanks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iGVT-g [mailto:igvt-g-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Alex Ivanov
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 2:51 AM
> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com; igvt-g@lists.01.org; virt-tools-list@redhat.com
> Subject: [iGVT-g] GVT-g - suboptimal user experience
>
> Hi.
> In the current state of gvt-g th...
2019 May 08
3
Re: [iGVT-g] GVT-g - suboptimal user experience
...hank you.
20.04.2019, 05:14, "Yuan, Hang" <hang.yuan@intel.com>:
> Could you elaborate a bit more about the first two features? On UEFI VMs support (Windows guest), do you mean enabling Windows VM display on UEFI? Thanks.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: iGVT-g [mailto:igvt-g-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Alex Ivanov
>> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 2:51 AM
>> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com; igvt-g@lists.01.org; virt-tools-list@redhat.com
>> Subject: [iGVT-g] GVT-g - suboptimal user experience
>>
>> Hi.
>> In t...
2019 May 09
0
Re: [iGVT-g] GVT-g - suboptimal user experience
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:gerd@kraxel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 3:28 PM
> To: Alex Ivanov <gnidorah@ya.ru>
> Cc: Yuan, Hang <hang.yuan@intel.com>; libvirt-users@redhat.com; igvt-
> g@lists.01.org; virt-tools-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [iGVT-g] GVT-g - suboptimal user experience
>
> Hi,
>
> > 1. Its about local display / dmabuf feature. Currently user needs to
> > use virt-viewer tool. But virt-manager already incorporates graphical
> &...
2019 May 09
0
Re: [iGVT-g] GVT-g - suboptimal user experience
Hi,
> 1. Its about local display / dmabuf feature. Currently user needs to
> use virt-viewer tool. But virt-manager already incorporates graphical
> console. It would be nice if it could support accelerated gvt-g local
> display.
virt-manager and virt-viewer essentially run the same code spice client
code: both are using the spice-gtk widget. So, if that isn't working
2019 May 19
1
Re: [iGVT-g] GVT-g - suboptimal user experience
So it looks like this solution is currently not very user friendly. Perhaps Intel could get Red Hat help to make first-class support of gvt feature in virt-manager?
09.05.2019, 10:28, "Gerd Hoffmann" <gerd@kraxel.org>:
> Hi,
>
>> 1. Its about local display / dmabuf feature. Currently user needs to
>> use virt-viewer tool. But virt-manager already incorporates