search for: iformations

Hi Chris, Chris Lattner wrote: >> 2) Line 369 of PPCInstrInfo.td, we declare the non-callee saved registers. >> However, Linux and Darwin do not have the same set >> of non-callee saved registers. I don't know how to make the if(isDarwin) test >> in here >> > > Take a look at ARM/ARMRegisterInfo.td for an example of this I tried to define Defs just

Dear all, I have strange problems with paste. Actually I suggest it is a bug (I send a associated bug report for some days ago too). I have a vector ce0, a character vector m and I paste them together: > ce0 [1] "1985" "9" "2" "2" "1" "A" "1" "" "NA" "5" [11]

Hello, Within the file "MSP430InstrFormats.td" there is a class called "MSP430Inst" which has "Instruction" as superclass. Within this class there is a field called "Inst" (field bits<16> Inst;) which gets assigned in classes which specifies a specific instruction format, e.g. IForm contains: let Inst{12-15} = opcode; let Inst{7} = ad.Value; let

I think the easiest thing for you to do is to define a separate CALL instruction with a different set of Defs. This instruction should only be selected when the predicate isMacho is true. Also update PPCRegisterInfo.cpp getCalleeSavedRegs() to return a different list when subtarget->isMachoABI() is true. Evan On Feb 14, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi Chris, >

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: >> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: >>> Is it possible to dynamically define implicit defs for some >>> instructions? >> >> Yes! This is what explicit operands are :). Specifically, if you >> want to >> vary on a per-opcode basis what registers are used/def'd by the >> instruction,

On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > I have almost completed the implementation of a linux/ppc backend in llvm. Cool! > There were a few things to modify in > lib/Target/PowerPC with a lot of "if (!isDarwin)". Some meta comments: 1. Please don't change PPC -> llvmPPC. I assume that you did this because PPC is a #define in some system header. Please

Hi Chris, Thanks for your response. > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: > > Is it possible to dynamically define implicit defs for some > > instructions? > > Yes! This is what explicit operands are :). Specifically, if you > want to > vary on a per-opcode basis what registers are used/def'd by the > instruction, you can just add those registers

On 12/14/2013 09:04 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: >> Is there someway nut can be modified to probe the 0664 permission usb >> devices >>> and then connect as root before dropping permissions back to the "nut" >>> gid? > Given that the udev method should still work (and seems to, for handcrafted > udev rules files), I would like to run that to ground first.

Hi, i have a question about syncing without pdbedit (exactly iformations stored in passdb.tdb) and /etc/passwd. I creating user with some comment, for example adduser test -c "my comment" -d /home/users/test -g 600 -s /bin/false and then i will add this user to samba pdbedit -a -s /etc/samba/smb.conf -u test Now i have stored in samba also comment "...

...---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:01:19 +0100 (CET) From: extmaillist at linuxbox.cz To: samba at lists.samba.org X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (), 4 required Subject: [Samba] Pdbedit <-> /etc/passwd sync? Hi, i have a question about syncing without pdbedit (exactly iformations stored in passdb.tdb) and /etc/passwd. I creating user with some comment, for example adduser test -c "my comment" -d /home/users/test -g 600 -s /bin/false and then i will add this user to samba pdbedit -a -s /etc/samba/smb.conf -u test Now i have stored in samba also comment "...

Hi, it looks like old-style code generators can no longer work with LLVM CVS, because: 1. The TableGen uses the DAG from instruction to computed the number of operands written in generated tables, and when there's no DAG, writes 0. 2. MachineInstructions::addRegOperand checks for maximum number of operands. So, when not using DAGS in TableGen input, addRegOperand asserts on adding the very

The Inst field is used to specify instruction encodings, which are then used to generate assemblers and disassemblers. I'm not sure offhand, but it's possible that the MSP430 backend doesn't make use of an auto-generated assembler. --Owen On Jul 21, 2013, at 4:19 PM, David Wiberg <dwiberg at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Within the file

Hello list, I am glad to announce that XC-AST version 0.9.0 is out today. New functionalities include: * Though not yet available to the end user, this release inclued the basis of the Outbounds Call Manager that will be released for 1.0. If you update from a previous version, have a look at the UPDATING.txt to understand how to upgrade your database schema. * The realtime visualization

Hi everyone, I have almost completed the implementation of a linux/ppc backend in llvm. There were a few things to modify in lib/Target/PowerPC with a lot of "if (!isDarwin)". There are some places where I need help before saying the port is complete. I attached the diff file as a reference 1) In order to generate a creqv instruction before a vararg call, I created a new

On Dec 14, 2013, at 4:23 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Do you know if the problem with upsdrvctl being able to probe/connect to the > usb devices is the result of some default permission change in Linux in general. > It seems to me that since nut used to work right out-of-the-box, then all/most > distros must have had the default permissions on usb nodes set to 0666, where >

On Dec 15, 2013, at 2:03 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 12/14/2013 09:04 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: >>> Is there someway nut can be modified to probe the 0664 permission usb >>> devices >>>> and then connect as root before dropping permissions back to the "nut" >>>> gid? >> Given that the udev method should still work (and seems to, for

On 12/14/2013 02:06 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Charles, > > Setting uid:gid to root:nut on /dev/bus/usb/004/002 seemed to be the issue. > The question now become how to automate this process so that the user isn't > required to manually hunt down the usb dev and change gid to the nut gid? So > far, either manually setting the gid or hand-rolling the udev files to do the

James, here are our updated answers after discussing this. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of James Molloy > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 8:49 AM > To: Ouriel, Boaz > Cc: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] SPIR provisional specifciation is now

Hi Boaz, I have a couple of specific questions: (a) You mention special calling conventions and adding them to LLVM. What are their semantics? And what is their purpose? (b) Why disallow type conversion for vector types? (ss. 3.3) Cheers, James On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:56 +0100, Ouriel, Boaz wrote: > Hi All, > > In continuation of the previous SPIR introduction email here is a link