search for: iformation

Hi Chris, Chris Lattner wrote: >> 2) Line 369 of PPCInstrInfo.td, we declare the non-callee saved registers. >> However, Linux and Darwin do not have the same set >> of non-callee saved registers. I don't know how to make the if(isDarwin) test >> in here >> > > Take a look at ARM/ARMRegisterInfo.td for an example of this I tried to define Defs just

...from m inbetween the ce0 values at all! However, this needs some background information. ce0 is originally from a large dataset (7000 obs x 1200 vars), read from a stata7-file using read.dta: > ce0 <- read.dta( "file.dta")[1,230:240] So I am afraid ce0 contains some kind of extra iformation which I was not able to figure about. Can anybody explain me what is going on here? My R is as follows: platform i686-pc-linux-gnu arch i686 os linux-gnu system i686, linux-gnu status major 1 minor 3.1 year 2001 month 08 day 31 language R Thanks in advance, Ott T...

Hello, Within the file "MSP430InstrFormats.td" there is a class called "MSP430Inst" which has "Instruction" as superclass. Within this class there is a field called "Inst" (field bits<16> Inst;) which gets assigned in classes which specifies a specific instruction format, e.g. IForm contains: let Inst{12-15} = opcode; let Inst{7} = ad.Value; let

I think the easiest thing for you to do is to define a separate CALL instruction with a different set of Defs. This instruction should only be selected when the predicate isMacho is true. Also update PPCRegisterInfo.cpp getCalleeSavedRegs() to return a different list when subtarget->isMachoABI() is true. Evan On Feb 14, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi Chris, >

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: >> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: >>> Is it possible to dynamically define implicit defs for some >>> instructions? >> >> Yes! This is what explicit operands are :). Specifically, if you >> want to >> vary on a per-opcode basis what registers are used/def'd by the >> instruction,

On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > I have almost completed the implementation of a linux/ppc backend in llvm. Cool! > There were a few things to modify in > lib/Target/PowerPC with a lot of "if (!isDarwin)". Some meta comments: 1. Please don't change PPC -> llvmPPC. I assume that you did this because PPC is a #define in some system header. Please

Hi Chris, Thanks for your response. > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: > > Is it possible to dynamically define implicit defs for some > > instructions? > > Yes! This is what explicit operands are :). Specifically, if you > want to > vary on a per-opcode basis what registers are used/def'd by the > instruction, you can just add those registers

...nd then get similar information from the other vendors, then it should be straight forward to add a routine to the upsdrvctl connection code that does something like: Attempt to connect if no connect; then probe usb system with udevadm info -a -n for all /dev/bus/usb/*/* parse/compare to known iformation if data matches known; then write/install udev rule (or use found information to otherwise connect) fi fi Attempt to connect if no connect; the throw error; fi This again, is all just brainstorming. If you have thoughts on it, let me know. I will have limited time over the next few weeks...

Hi, i have a question about syncing without pdbedit (exactly iformations stored in passdb.tdb) and /etc/passwd. I creating user with some comment, for example adduser test -c "my comment" -d /home/users/test -g 600 -s /bin/false and then i will add this user to samba pdbedit -a -s /etc/samba/smb.conf -u test Now i have stored in samba also comment &quot...

...---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:01:19 +0100 (CET) From: extmaillist at linuxbox.cz To: samba at lists.samba.org X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (), 4 required Subject: [Samba] Pdbedit <-> /etc/passwd sync? Hi, i have a question about syncing without pdbedit (exactly iformations stored in passdb.tdb) and /etc/passwd. I creating user with some comment, for example adduser test -c "my comment" -d /home/users/test -g 600 -s /bin/false and then i will add this user to samba pdbedit -a -s /etc/samba/smb.conf -u test Now i have stored in samba also comment &quot...

Hi, it looks like old-style code generators can no longer work with LLVM CVS, because: 1. The TableGen uses the DAG from instruction to computed the number of operands written in generated tables, and when there's no DAG, writes 0. 2. MachineInstructions::addRegOperand checks for maximum number of operands. So, when not using DAGS in TableGen input, addRegOperand asserts on adding the very

The Inst field is used to specify instruction encodings, which are then used to generate assemblers and disassemblers. I'm not sure offhand, but it's possible that the MSP430 backend doesn't make use of an auto-generated assembler. --Owen On Jul 21, 2013, at 4:19 PM, David Wiberg <dwiberg at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Within the file

.... * Due to popular demand, an explicit "delta" from period to period was added. * It is now possible to see waiting periods and call durations in real-time (as long as your system clock is the same or is synchronized to the Asterisk clock; in any other case you will not see relevant iformation and should turn off this feature). * Fixed a bug with the English pages where a percentage was showed with the Italian locale * Assorted minor bugfixes As always, the product is available free (as in beer) to smaller installations and * enthusiasts around the world to use and hack. Future p...

Hi everyone, I have almost completed the implementation of a linux/ppc backend in llvm. There were a few things to modify in lib/Target/PowerPC with a lot of "if (!isDarwin)". There are some places where I need help before saying the port is complete. I attached the diff file as a reference 1) In order to generate a creqv instruction before a vararg call, I created a new

On Dec 14, 2013, at 4:23 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Do you know if the problem with upsdrvctl being able to probe/connect to the > usb devices is the result of some default permission change in Linux in general. > It seems to me that since nut used to work right out-of-the-box, then all/most > distros must have had the default permissions on usb nodes set to 0666, where >

...een multiple UPSes (which can be done at the NUT driver level in ups.conf), but would not be necessary for setting the proper permissions with udev. > Attempt to connect > if no connect; then > probe usb system with udevadm info -a -n for all /dev/bus/usb/*/* > parse/compare to known iformation > if data matches known; then > write/install udev rule (or use found information to otherwise connect) > fi > fi > Attempt to connect > if no connect; the throw error; fi While this should work, the parse/compare step should be done by udev using the existing rules file, a...

On 12/14/2013 02:06 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Charles, > > Setting uid:gid to root:nut on /dev/bus/usb/004/002 seemed to be the issue. > The question now become how to automate this process so that the user isn't > required to manually hunt down the usb dev and change gid to the nut gid? So > far, either manually setting the gid or hand-rolling the udev files to do the

James, here are our updated answers after discussing this. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of James Molloy > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 8:49 AM > To: Ouriel, Boaz > Cc: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] SPIR provisional specifciation is now

Hi Boaz, I have a couple of specific questions: (a) You mention special calling conventions and adding them to LLVM. What are their semantics? And what is their purpose? (b) Why disallow type conversion for vector types? (ss. 3.3) Cheers, James On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:56 +0100, Ouriel, Boaz wrote: > Hi All, > > In continuation of the previous SPIR introduction email here is a link