Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "ifit".
Did you mean:
fit
2005 Nov 29
1
saving AIC of intermediate models in step
Hi all,
I'm fitting GLM's using the step or stepAIC procedures and I would
like to save the AIC of the intermediate models. I would appreciate
very much information about how todo this.
Best wishes
Germ??n L??pez
2006 Apr 07
5
Is mongrel stable enough to be used in a production environment?
Is mongrel stable enough to be used in a production environment? Is it
stable?
If so, which version is recommended?
Thanks,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/attachments/20060407/8d3ad7b4/attachment.htm
2004 Sep 16
0
[LLVMdev] To APR Or Not To APR. That is the question.
Reid,
Adding APR as one possible implementation of lib/System makes sense,
and is what I originally suggested when I brought up the question of
using APR. In particular, I agree that we want to keep APR or any
other similar layer encapsulated behind lib/System.
--Vikram
http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
On Sep 13, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Reid Spencer wrote:
> John,
>
2006 Feb 23
5
Help with SCGI please :(
Hi,
While learning Ruby and Rails, I decided I just as well learn Linux
along the way... It''s been fun, but I''m stuck at one of those
exasperating moments... I hope someone can help me :)
I installed Ruby 1.8.4 on Fedora Core 4, then Rails, then lighty, and
then SCGI.
I used yum to install lighty... and it already comes with mod_scgi.
I created my first application in
2004 Sep 13
7
[LLVMdev] To APR Or Not To APR. That is the question.
John,
If we were to do this, I don't think that adding it to the LLVM source
base is the right way to go. We would simply use "configure" to find the
library and header files. The moment we put APR into our source base, it
would be out of date. Keeping it up to date would not be fun for anyone
and there's no reason for us to do that. Furthermore, this approach
completely avoids
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
....6:
"The network path was not found, The semaphore timeout period has
expired..."
I have found many references to this message in various mailing lists but
only from people asking the same question. Does anyone have a clue what the
problem is?
Regards,
Dennis
Return-Path: <helmut@ifit.uni-klu.ac.at>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from pisun1.ifit.uni-klu.ac.at (pisun1.ifit.uni-klu.ac.at
[143.205.118.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BBF420F
for <samba@samba.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 02:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ifit.uni-klu.ac.at ([143.20...