Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ifinterpreterisgpl".
2006 Sep 17
1
R-base licensing question
...rom R-base. As I understand it, the
situation isn't clear as to the licensing restrictions on R scripts
which use R-base (or any other GPL package). The FSF's FAQ on the
issue says the following (of course, this is just their
interpretation):
(http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL)
"[...]Another similar and very common case is to provide libraries with
the interpreter which are themselves interpreted. For instance, Perl
comes with many Perl modules, and a Java implementation comes with many
Java classes. These libraries and the programs that call them are
always dy...
2008 Nov 14
2
licensing of R packages
...a lawyer", but I would like to hear the (hopefully
informed) opinion of other people.
I would say that, according to the FSF's interpretation of the GPL,
any R code using GPL packages can be distributed legally only using
GPL-compatible licenses.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL
> Another similar and very common case is to provide libraries with the
> interpreter which are themselves interpreted. For instance, Perl comes
> with many Perl modules, and a Java implementation comes with many Java
> classes. These libraries and the programs that call them are always...
2013 Jan 24
3
Implications of a Dependency on a GPLed Package
...hat if you choose to use GPL'd Perl modules or Java classes in your program, you must release the program in a GPL-compatible way, regardless of the license used in the Perl or Java interpreter that the combined Perl or Java program will run on.
(from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL)
My understanding of this section is the following:
1. If I develop and distribute an R package which depends on another package that is released under the GPL, I have to release my package in a GPL-compatible way.
2. Given that R itself is distributed as a set of base packages (released under t...
2009 Apr 24
1
About ParallelR and licensing of packages
Howdy all...
Reading with interest the thread(s) about REvolution, package
licensing and the requirements of the GPL.
First of all, let me introduce myself?. ?I joined REvolution Computing
in February, after working for nearly 4 years for Intel as an open
source strategist and before that for 6 years at Sun, where I
established the first corporate open source programs office. ?I'm a
Member of
2017 Mar 24
5
non-infectious license for R package?
Dear All,
I've been following this mailing list for over three years now, but
its just now that I have realized that R is licensed under GPL! :-)
I'm not a lawyer and I don't want lawyer advice, but I'd like to get
your feedback on a license question. My goal is to develop commercial
software for image analysis of biomedical samples that may be used
i.e. in academic institutions.