search for: iff_live_name_change

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "iff_live_name_change".

2019 Apr 05
2
[PATCH net v6] failover: allow name change on IFF_UP slave interfaces
...ude/linux/netdevice.h > @@ -1498,6 +1498,7 @@ struct net_device_ops { > * @IFF_FAILOVER: device is a failover master device > * @IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE: device is lower dev of a failover master device > * @IFF_L3MDEV_RX_HANDLER: only invoke the rx handler of L3 master device > + * @IFF_LIVE_NAME_CHANGE: rename is allowed while device is running > */ > enum netdev_priv_flags { > IFF_802_1Q_VLAN = 1<<0, > @@ -1530,6 +1531,7 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags { > IFF_FAILOVER = 1<<27, > IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE = 1<<28, > IFF_L3MDEV_RX_HANDLER = 1<<29,...
2019 Apr 05
2
[PATCH net v6] failover: allow name change on IFF_UP slave interfaces
...ude/linux/netdevice.h > @@ -1498,6 +1498,7 @@ struct net_device_ops { > * @IFF_FAILOVER: device is a failover master device > * @IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE: device is lower dev of a failover master device > * @IFF_L3MDEV_RX_HANDLER: only invoke the rx handler of L3 master device > + * @IFF_LIVE_NAME_CHANGE: rename is allowed while device is running > */ > enum netdev_priv_flags { > IFF_802_1Q_VLAN = 1<<0, > @@ -1530,6 +1531,7 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags { > IFF_FAILOVER = 1<<27, > IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE = 1<<28, > IFF_L3MDEV_RX_HANDLER = 1<<29,...
2019 Apr 03
2
[PATCH net v5] failover: allow name change on IFF_UP slave interfaces
...an get it back, patch is needed for > netvsc to remove the VF takeover delay IMHO. > > Sridhar, what do you think we revive the IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK flag which > allows netvsc to be used later on? Or maybe, IFF_LIVE_RENAME_OK for a > better name? > > -Siwei I would name it IFF_LIVE_NAME_CHANGE to match IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE there is no reason its use should be restricted to SLAVE devices.
2019 Apr 03
2
[PATCH net v5] failover: allow name change on IFF_UP slave interfaces
...an get it back, patch is needed for > netvsc to remove the VF takeover delay IMHO. > > Sridhar, what do you think we revive the IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK flag which > allows netvsc to be used later on? Or maybe, IFF_LIVE_RENAME_OK for a > better name? > > -Siwei I would name it IFF_LIVE_NAME_CHANGE to match IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE there is no reason its use should be restricted to SLAVE devices.
2019 Apr 03
0
[PATCH net v5] failover: allow name change on IFF_UP slave interfaces
...or >> netvsc to remove the VF takeover delay IMHO. >> >> Sridhar, what do you think we revive the IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK flag which >> allows netvsc to be used later on? Or maybe, IFF_LIVE_RENAME_OK for a >> better name? >> >> -Siwei > > I would name it IFF_LIVE_NAME_CHANGE to match IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE > there is no reason its use should be restricted to SLAVE devices. > Stephen, May be you should consider moving netvsc to use the net_failover driver now?