search for: ifconfigs

A stupid question: which is recomended? I have 1 interface eth0. I need to set about 20 virtual interfaces eth0:xx on it. If I create them with ifconfig eth0:xx I see it with ifconfig and with ip addr ls. If I set it with ''ip addr add'', ifconfig don''t show them, but ''ip addr ls'' and ''route'' show them. So, which is better?

I don't have ifconfig on my new installation of CentOS 5.6, but it is on my server in the cloud. What package contains it? Thanks, John -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Jason Hellenthal >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: ifconfig(8) fails to set MTU on multiple interfaces. >Severity: non-critical >Priority: high >Category: kern >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD disbatch.DataIX.local 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #23 r238498: Sun Jul

Hi! I installed CentOS 7 today, it's a minimal install, so it didn't have ifconfig command. So I installed net-tools, however I can't add ipv6 address to it. # ifconfig enp0s3 add fc00::1002/124 SIOCSIFADDR: Permission denied. Yes, I'm running as root. CentOS is running in a Qemu instance with e1000 ethernet card.

Hi, tuning my network fixing nic's speed and duplex (both on server and switch) i got this error with bce driver: # ifconfig bce0 bce0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=1bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4> ether 00:15:c5:fe:11:01 inet 192.168.1.13 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast

> kextload /Library/Extensions/tun.kext/ I didn't have a /Library/Extensions/tun.kext/ on my machine. I googled around, and downloaded and installed from http://tuntaposx.sourceforge.net/. Not sure why the macports install didn't work, but it seems I'm making progress. Now I get this: > sudo tincd -n dpsf -D -d3 tincd 1.0.21 (Feb 3 2015 20:09:36) starting, debug level 3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to run a QEMU VM on top of a FreeBSD 7.x server ... I've tried the exact same setup on my desktop, using 192.168.1.x and an fxp device, and it all works perfectly, but as soon as I do this on another machine on a public IP, I'm not getting any routing, I can't even ping it from the same machine ... My first thought was

Thanks very much! It's alive! For others who are having problems, this is a summary of the differences I needed between Linux and OS X: You'll need to install http://tuntaposx.sourceforge.net/ manually. On tinc.conf: > Linux Name = ntwigg2014linux AddressFamily = ipv4 Interface = dpsfVPN ConnectTo = dpserver001 > Mac Same, but remove the Interface line entirely On tinc-up: >

Hi I intent to use brctl to bridge two devices on linux box. One is eth0, the other is USB net which is recognized as usb0 by linux box. Then I run following command # ifconfig eth0 down # ifconfig usb0 down # brctt addbr ipbr # brctl addif ipbr eth0 # brctl addif ipbr usb0 # ifconfig eth0 up # ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 # ifconfig usb0 up # ifconfig usb0 0.0.0.0 # ifconfig ipv6 up

I and testing command line to up and down ethernet connection. if I perform following, client can not re-connect. ????? ifconfig eth0 down ????? ifconfig eth0 up if I use following, client can re-connect: ????? ifconfig eth0 down ????? ifup eth0 What difference between "ifconfig up" and "ifup"? thanks.

Hello, I how an embedded processor that needs to act as a bridge between a wireless and wired network. I have managed to bring up the bridge fine. I can also bring up the bridge with a static ip address. However I can not figure out how to bring up the bridge with a dynamic ip address. Is it possible to for a bridge to get a dynamically assigned ip address? Oliver

Hi all, I need to (quickly!grrr) update IP addresses for which a given machine will answer. I did this: /sbin/ifconfig eth0:0 xx.xx.xx.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:1 xx.xx.xx.11 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:2 xx.xx.xx.30 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:3 xx.xx.xx.31 netmask 255.255.255.0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:4 xx.xx.xx.13 netmask 255.255.255.0

Hi Ivo and Guus, We are writing a book on building VPNs for Linux and a part of it describes tinc. I wanted to make sure that your opinion, as tinc authors and developers, is reflected. First, let me ask a couple of technical questions. 1. If there are two hosts, foo and bar, that are to be connected via tinc, and each host should only have _one_ IP address (i.e. nmask is /32), would the

wiki name: HavardSorli Page for update : https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS7 some notes / comments to: FAQ "7. What have you done with ifconfig/netstat?" "no longer install the net-utils package" I am not 100% sure, but I think "net-utils" is the wrong package name. I have checked Centos 4.9 and 7.2, ifconfig is part of the net-tools package # rpm -ql net-tools

With kernel 2.6.13.4 linux bridge with traffic management for 4000users and 20.4 MB/s(tx)/22.4 MB/s(rx) data load of CPU is max 50% With kernel 2.6.15.1 the same linux bridge with the same traffic has 100% CPU load and in top I have ksoftirqd proccess. The machine is P4 3.2 GHz with 1GB of ram and 4 NetGear 620 cards The config is: /sbin/modprobe acenic link=0x0100,0x0100,0x0100,0x0100

Hi, Just thought I'd mention that I spent a while battling with tinc today. I had quite a weird behaviour - in routing mode, tinc would come up fine on both hosts, but pinging hosta from hostb wouldn't work until hosta pinged hostb. I've used an earlier version of tinc before in a different environment with no problems, and vaguely remembered a more complicated tinc-up script, so I

On my CentOS 6 partition of my laptop: First note that for this test, NetworkManager is not running because I did: chkconfig --del NetworkManager and then rebooted. Here is my ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE="eth0" NM_CONTROLLED="no" ONBOOT=no HWADDR=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.2.5 PREFIX=24 GATEWAY=192.168.2.1 DNS1=192.168.2.1 DNS2=192.168.2.1

On Sep 4, 2016, at 1:27 PM, Walter H. <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > 'ifconfig' doesn't show these additional addresses ... This is one of the many reasons why people don?t use ?ifconfig? anymore. -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>

Moi! I upgraded Xen-2.0.1 to Xen-2.0.5 (testing) and everything compiled cleanly. I''m still able to boot dom0 and start domUs but networking doesn''t work anymore. xen-br0 appears in dom0, but vif-interfaces now only when ifconfig -a is used. Interface appears in domU and all seems to be fine, except no any data doesn''t move in any direction. I can''t even ping

Beste tinc-developer, Ik moet van mijn baas een aantal VPN's aanleggen en ben nu thuis bezig om te testen. Ik heb 2 computers in een thuisnetwerkje (totaal 6 computers) geinstalleerd met SuSe 7.3, daar de klanten dit ook hebben. De computers zijn verbonden met een switch. Dit is de inhoud van mijn bestanden: Op computer 1 genaamd suse met ip 192.168.0.99 netmask 255.255.255.0