search for: ifatptr128

> On Nov 19, 2015, at 9:50 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 19 Nov 2015, at 17:49, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: >> >> I must miss something, but I don’t get what is the problem of lower the pointer to actual integer. > > Pointers, in our architecture, are not integers. Thanks for the clarifications. So

...would fit in the framework. That being said, anything that you could do in SDag should be possible as well in the new framework. > > We currently add several new nodes to SDag: INTTOPTR, PTRTOINT, and PTRADD, and a new iFATPTR MVT. The last is somewhat problematic, as we really want to have iFATPTR128 and iFATPTR256 (and, potentially, iFATPTR64 for an IoT/embedded variant). > > David > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160107/fbf1b688/attachment.html>