search for: if_spppsubr

...VI. Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. Branch Revision Path - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_4 src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c 1.59.2.15 RELENG_4_11 src/UPDATING 1.73.2.91.2.21 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.44.2.39.2.24 src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c 1.59.2.13.10.1 RELENG_5 src/sy...

...VI. Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. Branch Revision Path - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_4 src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c 1.59.2.15 RELENG_4_11 src/UPDATING 1.73.2.91.2.21 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.44.2.39.2.24 src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c 1.59.2.13.10.1 RELENG_5 src/sy...

...VI. Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. Branch Revision Path - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_4 src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c 1.59.2.15 RELENG_4_11 src/UPDATING 1.73.2.91.2.21 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.44.2.39.2.24 src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c 1.59.2.13.10.1 RELENG_5 src/sy...

...VI. Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. Branch Revision Path - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_4 src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c 1.59.2.15 RELENG_4_11 src/UPDATING 1.73.2.91.2.21 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.44.2.39.2.24 src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c 1.59.2.13.10.1 RELENG_5 src/sy...

I'd look at if_spppsubr.o, which is big in the llvm directories and doesn't appear in the gcc directory listings at all (I assume the listings were fed through tail or something, but there's clearly a sizeable difference there) On Jul 17, 2009, at 5:41 PMPDT, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009...

...========== clang 20070717 svn --enable-optimizations clang version 1.0 (http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk 76176M) text data bss dec hex 7412287 160516 1049460 8622263 8390b7 19m4.11s real 16m56.35s user 1m44.23s system -rw-r--r-- 1 jsg wsrc 122K Jul 18 01:41 if_spppsubr.o -rw-r--r-- 1 jsg wsrc 127K Jul 18 01:36 aic79xx.o -rw-r--r-- 1 jsg wsrc 130K Jul 18 01:46 pci_subr.o -rw-r--r-- 1 jsg wsrc 161K Jul 18 01:38 bwi.o -rw-r--r-- 1 jsg wsrc 349K Jul 18 01:47 isp_pci.o -rwxr-xr-x 1 jsg wsrc 7.9M Jul 18 01:54 bsd ========================= gcc 3.3....

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 04:41:55PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: >> > This seems to go against notes such as >> > http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#performance >> > which claim clang is signifcantly

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 04:41:55PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Gray<jsg at goblin.cx> wrote: > > This seems to go against notes such as > > http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#performance > > which claim clang is signifcantly faster than gcc. > > I think the URL you want is actually >