search for: idx1

Hi, Following is excerpted from dynamic-vector-gep.ll. The resulting "extractelement" seems to always return 0.0f regardless the value idx1 and idx2 is holding. Am I missing something here or there is something fishy take place? Thanks Shuxin 101 ; CHECK: test6 102 ; CHECK: insertelement <4 x float> zeroinitializer, float 1.000000e+00, i32 %idx1 103 ; CHECK: extractelement <4 x float> zeroinitializer, i32 %idx2 104 105...

...y so the original bug is long gone. Thanks, Pete On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Following is excerpted from dynamic-vector-gep.ll. > The resulting "extractelement" seems to always return 0.0f regardless the value idx1 and idx2 is holding. > Am I missing something here or there is something fishy take place? > > Thanks > Shuxin > > > 101 ; CHECK: test6 > 102 ; CHECK: insertelement <4 x float> zeroinitializer, float 1.000000e+00, i32 %idx1 > 103 ; CHECK: extractelement <4 x f...

For the gep: %idx1 = getelementptr i32* %MyVar, i32 0 i32* is the type that MyVar is pointing to and i32 is the type of the offset value, or what? If it's the type of offset value, then the size of the pointer shouldn't be less than i32, correct? The index is 0, so in this example, the address computation i...

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > For the gep: > > %idx1 = getelementptr i32* %MyVar, i32 0 > > i32* is the type that MyVar is pointing to and i32 is the type of the offset > value, or what? If it's the type of offset value, then > the size of the pointer shouldn't be less than i32, correct? > > > The index is 0, so in this e...

...that the caller can supply the expected type, and get error checking or casting? Or choose to not supply the type and get whatever they get? But for CreateConstGEP2_32, there is only the variety with the type supplied: Value * CreateConstGEP2_32 (Type *Ty, Value *Ptr, unsigned Idx0, unsigned Idx1, const Twine &Name="") For CreateConstGEP2_64, there is only the version with no Type supplied: Value * CreateConstGEP2_64 (Value *Ptr, uint64_t Idx0, uint64_t Idx1, const Twine &Name="") Same for CreateConstGEP1_64 -- no Type* parameter. Can anybody offer insigh...

...}; + unsigned int rounds, idx, retval_idx, seed; + char *retval; + + rounds = (dgst_raw_len / 2) + 1; + + retval = xmalloc(sizeof(char)*(rounds*6)); + + seed = 1; + + retval_idx = 0; + + retval[retval_idx++] = 'x'; + + for (idx=0;idx<rounds;idx++) { + + unsigned int idx0, idx1, idx2, idx3, idx4; + + if ((idx + 1 < rounds) || (dgst_raw_len % 2 != 0)) { + + idx0 = (((((unsigned int)(dgst_raw[2*idx])) >> 6) & 3) + seed) % 6; + idx1 = (((unsigned int)(dgst_raw[2*idx])) >> 2) & 15; + idx2 = ((((unsigned int)(dgst_raw[2*idx])) & 3) + (seed / 6...

Dear all I have a function in which I would like to change some values to NA according to some condition. dropout<-function(y, nahr=FALSE,...) { <some stuff for computing an index> if (nahr) y[index]<<-NA invisible(index) } in case y is a vector all works OK but if it is a part of data frame by calling dropout(df$y) or dropout(df[,number]) no change is done. Please can you

...sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > >> Base is treated as unsigned so 0xff…ff + 1 would be 0x100…00 > > This is the part I was missing, thanks for pointing out the FAQ. So > the infinitely precise address computed by a GEP is > > zext(Base) + sext(Idx0) + sext(Idx1) … ? Yes, that is the way I read it. >> 0x100…00 which would be out of bounds (sort of). > > Does this mean, for C++ programs of the form, > > for (int *I = array, *E = array + size; I != E; ++I) > ... > > the memory allocator has to guarantee that array cannot sp...

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > Eli, > >    Ok, thanks, this is a big help. So how can I use the TargetData (or get > the TargetData) without having a DAG? If you're writing a transformation pass, just write "getAnalysisIfAvailable<TargetData>()" to get a TargetData*. -Eli

Hi Shuxin, > Following is excerpted from dynamic-vector-gep.ll. > The resulting "extractelement" seems to always return 0.0f regardless the value > idx1 and idx2 is holding. > Am I missing something here or there is something fishy take place? maybe this is the same as PR15674. Ciao, Duncan.

...mment over there and close it. Thank you again! Shuxin On 4/6/13 2:55 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Shuxin, > >> Following is excerpted from dynamic-vector-gep.ll. >> The resulting "extractelement" seems to always return 0.0f regardless >> the value >> idx1 and idx2 is holding. >> Am I missing something here or there is something fishy take place? > > maybe this is the same as PR15674. > > Ciao, Duncan. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://ll...

...numeric vectors. Say, I have, A <- c(1,2,3,4) and A <- c(0,3,1,5) and we cmpare: > idx <- A<B So: > idx [1] FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE Question 1: I would like to get a vector that stores the indices for entries of A such that this relationship is true. In this case, a vector idx1 < c(2,4), because the 2nd and 4th entries of A satisfy the conditions Question 2: I would like to know the maximum index of the entry in A for which the relationship is true. In this case, max_indx = 4, since the 4th entry of A is such. Could you please give me some hints? Thank you, -Chee...

Eli, Ok, thanks, this is a big help. So how can I use the TargetData (or get the TargetData) without having a DAG? On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Ok, thanks, this makes sense. But there is no way to get the > SelectionDAG to > > do it

...; >>>> Base is treated as unsigned so 0xff…ff + 1 would be 0x100…00 >>> >>> This is the part I was missing, thanks for pointing out the FAQ. So >>> the infinitely precise address computed by a GEP is >>> >>> zext(Base) + sext(Idx0) + sext(Idx1) … ? >> >> Yes, that is the way I read it. >> >>>> 0x100…00 which would be out of bounds (sort of). >>> >>> Does this mean, for C++ programs of the form, >>> >>> for (int *I = array, *E = array + size; I != E; ++I) >>>...

In principle, I'd like to be able to do something like this: sge.parLapply(seq(10), function(x) parLapply(seq(x), function(x) x^2)) In practice, however, I have to resort to acrobatics like this: sge.options(sge.remove.files=FALSE) sge.options(sge.qsub.options='-cwd -V') sge.parLapply(seq(10), function(x) { sge.options(sge.save.global=TRUE)

...rom LaTeX ... /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/bin/Rd2dvi: line 333: pdflatex: command not found lstat(./makeindex) failed ... ./makeindex: No such file or directory Couldn't find input index file Rd2 nor Rd2.idx. Usage: makeindex [-ilqrcgLT] [-s sty] [-o ind] [-t log] [-p num] [idx0 idx1 ...] /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/bin/Rd2dvi: line 335: pdflatex: command not found /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/bin/Rd2dvi: line 337: pdflatex: command not found Saving output to 'Rd2.pdf' ... cp: .Rd2dvi28208/Rd2.pdf: No such file or directory Done

...><span class="lines">@@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ </span><span class="cx"> @log = log </span><span class="cx"> </span><span class="cx"> @il = Wx::ImageList.new(16,16) </span><del>- @idx1 = @il.add(Wx::Bitmap.new("./icons/wxwin16x16.xpm")) </del><ins>+ bmp_file = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), "icons/wxwin16x16.xpm") + + @idx1 = @il.add(Wx::Bitmap.new(bmp_file)) </ins><span class="cx"> set_image_l...

...: (XEN) *** Serial input -> Xen (type ''CTRL-a'' three times to switch input to DOM0) (XEN) ''u'' pressed -> dumping numa info (now-0x4B:40CB2A11) (XEN) idx0 -> NODE0 start->0 size->1703936 (XEN) phys_to_nid(0000000000001000) -> 0 should be 0 (XEN) idx1 -> NODE1 start->1703936 size->1572863 (XEN) phys_to_nid(00000001a0001000) -> 1 should be 1 (XEN) CPU0 -> NODE0 (XEN) CPU1 -> NODE1 (XEN) CPU2 -> NODE0 (XEN) CPU3 -> NODE1 (XEN) CPU4 -> NODE0 (XEN) CPU5 -> NODE1 (XEN) CPU6 -> NODE0 (XEN) CPU7 -> NODE1 (XEN) CPU8 -...

Hi, Your question is still not clear. May be this helps: dat2<- read.table(text=" patient_id????? t???????? scores 1????????????????????? 0??????????????? 1.6 1????????????????????? 1??????????????? 2.6 1????????????????????? 2???????????????? 2.2 1????????????????????? 3???????????????? 1.8 2????????????????????? 0????????????????? 2.3 2?????????????????????? 2???????????????? 2.5

Hi again, thanks a lot for the quick answer. I just forgot the comma, always these stupid mistakes... Anyways, as I said before, I have two data.frames containing about 1000 rows and I would like to avoid looping through all of them... In each data.frame are coordinates (x,y,z), so every row is giving the information on one single point. I would like to calculate the distance from each point