search for: idiosyncracies

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Spike White <spikewhitetx at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a question on how to deal with a quirk of the Intel Boot Agent. > Both for PXE boots and for EFI boots. > > I've noticed this IBA quirk for years. According to the "DHCP options" > RFC, variable length DHCP options are not necessarily null-terminated. > So if I specify

H. Peter, Do you still work at Intel? Any pull with Intel's NIC F/W team? Ask them to "Respect the RFC!" (Like Cartman -- "Respect My Authority!") That would be the best solution. :-) But I know I work for a hardware vendor and I have *zero* pull with any internal firmware team. Spike > Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:02:54 -0700 > From: "H. Peter Anvin"

Don't know what else to call this. Googling and some time on the IRC channel haven't gotten me anywhere. Here's the sitch, which is a bit complicated but is something my customers are in fact encountering on an everyday basis: 1. Bob is on a Zap channel talking through the PSTN to Carol. Both have the misfortune, like so many of us, of having LECs who do not offer disconnect

On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 00:02 -0500, Spike White wrote: > So if I specify Bootfile name (option 67), frequently that's the last real > DHCP option. Thus the next byte is the DHCP "end option" aka 255. The IBA > code mistakenly parses this as "/boot/efi.x64/syslinux.efi^X", where ^X > is a char with value 0xFF (255). It requests this filename from the TFTP

All, I have a question on how to deal with a quirk of the Intel Boot Agent. Both for PXE boots and for EFI boots. I've noticed this IBA quirk for years. According to the "DHCP options" RFC, variable length DHCP options are not necessarily null-terminated. Here's the details: >From DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2132#section-2)

On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:53:41PM -0700, reed kotler wrote: > Basically, labels that are not landing pad symbols that are inserted > for exception handling > and dwarf purposes, must declared : > > $mysym = . > > as opposed to: > > $mysym: Can't you use $mysym +/- 1 in the landing pad reference to work this idiosyncracy? Joerg

> It's close to irrelevant when they last worked at this point - the current > stable release series is 1.4.x, and they definitely won't work with that. acknowledged Visual Studio 2008, win32 makefiles (from C. Hull's website) and xapian-core-1.2.8 are mentioned together on this webpage https://lists.xapian.org/pipermail/xapian-devel/2012-October/001883.html

I am using MS Excel (Windos Operating system), how I import/export data between MS_Excel and R. Regds Faisal Afzal SIddiqui +92-300-9297089 fasidfas at yahoo.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.

Full_Name: Gordon Lack Version: 2.4.0 OS: OSF1 v5.1 Submission from: (NULL) (198.28.92.5) Changes to the bin/R front-end interlude script at 2.4.0 (cf: 2.2.0) have broken R on (Dec/Compaq/HP) OSF1. There are 3 occurrences of "${@}", but this is the incorrect syntax for adding $@, as on older Bourne shells this will add an empty (but present) parameter. The result is that the build

mips16 has some unusual requirements for label symbols in .s. I think that arm thumb has the same issue but have not located yet how this is handled. When you have a label of an instruction in mips16, when you reference the label, the linker adds a 1 to the address. When you call an odd numbered address, the procesor switches to mips16 mode and when you call an even numbered address it

...hat you are about to endure, I can only offer my apologies. Apologies accepted! :) Seriously though, the Samba team has done a great job with the AD stuff. I was pretty much able to drop Samba4 in as a replacement for our SBS 2008 with virtually no issues. What issues I had were mostly Microsoft idiosyncracies (refer to my GPO rant to Rowland). I used the Slackware as-shipped Samba4, provisioned (with BIND9_FLATFILE), added users with RSAT ADUC and Win7 domain users were none the wiser, everything just worked: redirected folders, RDC, SLQ Server "Windows Authentication", etc. Good job! My qu...

Does the "legend" command work in the windows version of R? Here is the command that I'm using: legend(1,1,legend=c("G1","G2","G3","G4","G5","G6"),pch=array(1:6,dim=c (1,6))) When I use this on my existing graph in a window I get a solid black box at the lower left. If I use this with the postscript driver my output

Solaris 2.6 gcc 2.95.3 Compiling tdb/tdbbackup. Linking bin/tdbbackup Undefined first referenced Symbol in file smb_snprintf tdb/tdbackup.o I thought we'd fixed this already.

...//www.avg.com > > Chipping in after rather a long time away....I would advise that updating the nmake files will be a long and painful process if it works at all. The nmake method was always a hack, required lots of hoop-jumping to work around both Windows nmake and Visual C++ compiler idiosyncracies. If it's possible to compile Xapian for Windows using another method, do that. Charlie

Thank you, looks like the regex idiosyncracy might have been the issue. My current file: [sl] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto desc = "CyberPower UPS SL" product = "SL.*" productid = 0501 vendorid = 0764 #model = "SL Series" [ab] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto desc =

Thanks! FWIW if you do get to test new code, https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1811 adds warnings for situations like yours. Would be great to check if it works actually, with many "same-serial" devices :) Jim On Sat, Jan 14, 2023, 23:39 Bruce Pleat <bpleat at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, looks like the regex idiosyncracy might have been the issue. > > My

Part of what made my life harder is nut-scanner isn't in the package. Once I get a chance, I'll update to 2.8, but that'll be a little while off. (Any clue how to get 2.8 included in the package provider for my Raspberry Pi is presumably beyond the scope of this list, but if someone knows and wants to let me know, I wouldn't complain...) On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 3:12 PM Jim

Just a note: recent PRs are naturally not in 2.8.0 release (April 2022), but would be in eventual 2.8.1 Jim On Sun, Jan 15, 2023, 00:51 Bruce Pleat <bpleat at gmail.com> wrote: > Part of what made my life harder is nut-scanner isn't in the package. > > Once I get a chance, I'll update to 2.8, but that'll be a little while off. > (Any clue how to get 2.8 included in

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 01:09:14PM +0200, David Ayers wrote: >Am Donnerstag, den 31.08.2017, 11:32 +0200 schrieb David Ayers: >> >> Am Donnerstag, den 31.08.2017, 10:11 +0200 schrieb Martin Kletzander: >> > >> > AFAIK the support for this was not added. Feel free to request this in >> > our bugzilla [1] so that we can track it. Or, even better, send a

Can anybody of the architects of R enlighten me about the reasoning behind the selection of the IEEE 754 mode for the building of R, please? Special points of interest are: 1. The selection seems to be based on the availability of isnan() and finite(). Is this a common way to test for IEEE 754? 2. The C9x draft introduces isfinite() instead of finite() (and as I see, some systems, e.g. the