Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "idesyncrat".
Did you mean:
idesyncratic
2015 Apr 27
4
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Joerg Schilling
<Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >
> The GPL makes claims that are in conflict with the law because these claims are
> not amongst what the list in the law permits and that are thus void.
The GPL is all that gives you permission to distribute. If it is
void then you have no permission at all to distribute any
2015 Apr 27
0
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
...distributable projects there's not much reason to deal with the
> inability to combine with other widely used components. What's the
> point - and what do you have against the way perl handles it?
You are of course wrong and you ignore everything I explained you before.
If your idesyncratic GPL interpretation was true, your whole Linux distro would
be illegal. When do you withdraw your Linux distro?
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.net (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL...
2015 Apr 27
1
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
...the way perl handles it?
>
> You are of course wrong and you ignore everything I explained you before.
And likewise you ignore the fact that you would not lose anything with
a dual license other than the reason for frequent arguments. And my
only question is 'why not'?
> If your idesyncratic GPL interpretation was true, your whole Linux distro would
> be illegal. When do you withdraw your Linux distro?
How so? Which process links GPL and non-GPL-compatible licensed code
into a single work? No one has suggested that it is a problem to
distribute separate differently-licensed w...