search for: ident_asm_op

Duncan, I was wondering if you plan on supporting the build of dragonegg under gcc 4.8.1svn for the llvm 3.3 release? Is the deprecation and poisoning of IDENT_ASM_OP too problematic to work around without some additional substitute being added in FSF gcc upstream? Jack

On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > Duncan, > I was wondering if you plan on supporting the build of dragonegg under gcc 4.8.1svn > for the llvm 3.3 release? Is the deprecation and poisoning of IDENT_ASM_OP too problematic > to work around without some additional substitute being added in FSF gcc upstream? Hi Jack, There's a patch under review to add gcc 4.8 support: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130401/170127.html Part of that patch has already been applied....

...06:53:05AM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Duncan, > > I was wondering if you plan on supporting the build of dragonegg under gcc 4.8.1svn > > for the llvm 3.3 release? Is the deprecation and poisoning of IDENT_ASM_OP too problematic > > to work around without some additional substitute being added in FSF gcc upstream? > > Hi Jack, > > There's a patch under review to add gcc 4.8 support: > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130401/170127.html Peter, Thank...

...On 08/05/13 15:53, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Duncan, >> I was wondering if you plan on supporting the build of dragonegg under gcc 4.8.1svn >> for the llvm 3.3 release? Is the deprecation and poisoning of IDENT_ASM_OP too problematic >> to work around without some additional substitute being added in FSF gcc upstream? > > Hi Jack, > > There's a patch under review to add gcc 4.8 support: > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130401/170127.html > > Part of t...

...ter Collingbourne wrote: > > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > Duncan, > > > I was wondering if you plan on supporting the build of dragonegg under gcc 4.8.1svn > > > for the llvm 3.3 release? Is the deprecation and poisoning of IDENT_ASM_OP too problematic > > > to work around without some additional substitute being added in FSF gcc upstream? > > > > Hi Jack, > > > > There's a patch under review to add gcc 4.8 support: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-2013040...

...00, Peter Collingbourne wrote: >> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Duncan, >>> I was wondering if you plan on supporting the build of dragonegg under gcc 4.8.1svn >>> for the llvm 3.3 release? Is the deprecation and poisoning of IDENT_ASM_OP too problematic >>> to work around without some additional substitute being added in FSF gcc upstream? >> >> Hi Jack, >> >> There's a patch under review to add gcc 4.8 support: >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130401/170127....